• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychosocial Factors, Smoke-Free Restrictions, and Media Exposure in Relation to Smoking-Related Attitudes and Behaviors among Adults in Armenia and Georgia.亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚成年人的社会心理因素、禁烟令和媒体接触与吸烟相关态度和行为的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 11;18(8):4013. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084013.
2
Tobacco-related risk perceptions, social influences and public smoke-free policies in relation to smoke-free home restrictions: findings from a baseline cross-sectional survey of Armenian and Georgian adults in a community randomised trial.与无烟家庭限制相关的与烟草相关的风险认知、社会影响和公共无烟政策:在社区随机试验中对亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚成年人进行的基线横断面调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):e055396. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055396.
3
Smokers' and Nonsmokers' Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia.亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的吸烟者和非吸烟者对无烟政策以及支持和反对政策信息的接受程度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15):5527. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155527.
4
Smoke-free home restrictions in Armenia and Georgia: motives, barriers and secondhand smoke reduction behaviors.亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的无烟家庭限制:动机、障碍和减少二手烟行为。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;33(5):864-871. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad129.
5
Associations Between Pro/Anti-Tobacco Media and Messaging Exposure and Knowledge and Support of Smoke-Free Policy Among Adults in Armenia and Georgia.亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚成年人中,亲/反烟草媒体和信息曝光与对无烟政策的知识和支持之间的关联。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30(4):501-511. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001828. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
6
ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS RELATED TO REDUCING SECONDHAND SMOKE EXPOSURE AMONG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN THE COUNTRY OF GEORGIA.减少格鲁吉亚医科大学生接触二手烟的态度和行为。
Georgian Med News. 2024 May(350):68-72.
7
Factors associated with support for social enforcement of smoke-free policies in Georgia and Armenia.佐治亚州和亚美尼亚支持无烟政策社会执行的相关因素。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2024 Aug 23;10. doi: 10.18332/tpc/191510. eCollection 2024.
8
Smoke-Free Public Policies and Voluntary Policies in Personal Settings in Tbilisi, Georgia: A Qualitative Study.格鲁吉亚第比利斯无烟公共政策及个人环境中的自愿政策:一项定性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jan 25;13(2):156. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13020156.
9
Reactions to smoke-free public policies and smoke-free home policies in the Republic of Georgia: results from a 2014 national survey.格鲁吉亚无烟公共政策和无烟家庭政策的反应:来自 2014 年全国调查的结果。
Int J Public Health. 2016 May;61(4):409-16. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0793-0. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
Pathways of change explaining the effect of smoke-free legislation on smoking cessation in The Netherlands. An application of the international tobacco control conceptual model.解释无烟立法对荷兰戒烟效果的变化途径。国际烟草控制概念模型的应用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Dec;14(12):1474-82. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts081. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Survey and analysis of the prevalence of tobacco use among patients with severe mental illness at a tertiary specialized psychiatric medical center in China.中国一家三级专业精神科医疗中心严重精神疾病患者烟草使用流行情况的调查与分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 30;16:1566356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1566356. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors associated with support for social enforcement of smoke-free policies in Georgia and Armenia.佐治亚州和亚美尼亚支持无烟政策社会执行的相关因素。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2024 Aug 23;10. doi: 10.18332/tpc/191510. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Smokers' and Nonsmokers' Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia.亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的吸烟者和非吸烟者对无烟政策以及支持和反对政策信息的接受程度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15):5527. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155527.
2
Patterns of tobacco use, quit attempts, readiness to quit and self-efficacy among smokers with anxiety or depression: Findings among six countries of the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys.焦虑或抑郁吸烟者的烟草使用模式、戒烟尝试、戒烟意愿和自我效能:欧洲 EUREST-PLUS ITC 调查六国的研究结果
Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Feb 5;16:A9. doi: 10.18332/tid/98965. eCollection 2018.
3
Examining smoke-free coalitions in Armenia and Georgia: baseline community capacity.考察亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的无烟煤联盟:基线社区能力。
Health Educ Res. 2019 Oct 1;34(5):495-504. doi: 10.1093/her/cyz024.
4
Anti-smoking social norms are associated with increased cessation behaviours among lower and higher socioeconomic status smokers: A population-based cohort study.反吸烟社会规范与社会经济地位较低和较高的吸烟者戒烟行为增加有关:基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208950. eCollection 2018.
5
A review of risk perception measurement in tobacco control research.烟草控制研究中的风险认知测量综述。
Tob Control. 2020 Jan;29(Suppl 1):s50-s58. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054005. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
6
The Impact of Implementing Tobacco Control Policies: The 2017 Tobacco Control Policy Scorecard.实施烟草控制政策的影响:2017 年烟草控制政策评分卡。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Sep/Oct;24(5):448-457. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000780.
7
Intentions to quit tobacco smoking in 14 low- and middle-income countries based on the transtheoretical model.基于跨理论模型的14个低收入和中等收入国家的戒烟意愿。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Sep 1;178:425-429. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.033. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
8
Applying Psychological Theories to Promote Long-Term Maintenance of Health Behaviors.应用心理学理论促进健康行为的长期维持。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016 Nov;10(6):356-368. doi: 10.1177/1559827614554594. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Reactance to Health Warnings Scale: Development and Validation.健康警示抗拒量表:编制与验证
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Oct;50(5):736-750. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9799-3.
10
Reactions to smoke-free public policies and smoke-free home policies in the Republic of Georgia: results from a 2014 national survey.格鲁吉亚无烟公共政策和无烟家庭政策的反应:来自 2014 年全国调查的结果。
Int J Public Health. 2016 May;61(4):409-16. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0793-0. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚成年人的社会心理因素、禁烟令和媒体接触与吸烟相关态度和行为的关系。

Psychosocial Factors, Smoke-Free Restrictions, and Media Exposure in Relation to Smoking-Related Attitudes and Behaviors among Adults in Armenia and Georgia.

机构信息

Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.

Non-Communicable Diseases Department, National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, 0198 Tbilisi, Georgia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 11;18(8):4013. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084013.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18084013
PMID:33920451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8068968/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perceived harm, social influences, smoke-free policies, and media exposure have been understudied in relation to tobacco-related attitudes/behaviors in aggregate or in low and middle-income countries; thus, this study examined these factors collectively in relation to smoking-related outcomes among Armenian and Georgian adults.

METHODS

Using 2018 cross-sectional survey data (n = 1456), multivariable regression analyses examined these factors in relation to smoking status, perceived harm among nonsmokers, and readiness to quit and past-year quit attempts among smokers.

RESULTS

Significant predictors ( < 0.05) of current smoking (27.3%) included lower perceived harm, more smoking friends, and fewer home and vehicle restrictions. Among nonsmokers, more home and restaurant/bar restrictions, fewer vehicle restrictions, greater anti-tobacco media exposure, and less pro-tobacco media exposure predicted greater perceived harm. Among smokers, greater perceived social acceptability of smoking, less anti-tobacco media exposure, and greater pro-tobacco media exposure predicted readiness to quit (12.7% of smokers). More smoking friends, more home restrictions, less anti-tobacco media exposure, and greater pro-tobacco media exposure predicted past-year quit attempts (19.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support the importance of smoke-free policies but were counterintuitive regarding the roles of social and media influences, underscoring the need to better understand how to address these influences, particularly in countries with high smoking rates.

摘要

背景

在亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚成年人中,整体或在中低收入国家中,与烟草相关的态度/行为相关的感知危害、社会影响、无烟政策和媒体接触都研究不足;因此,本研究共同考察了这些因素与吸烟相关结果之间的关系。

方法

使用 2018 年的横断面调查数据(n = 1456),多变量回归分析考察了这些因素与吸烟状况、非吸烟者感知危害以及吸烟者戒烟意愿和过去一年戒烟尝试之间的关系。

结果

当前吸烟(27.3%)的显著预测因素(<0.05)包括感知危害降低、吸烟朋友增多和家庭及车辆限制减少。在非吸烟者中,家庭和餐馆/酒吧限制增多、车辆限制减少、反烟草媒体接触增加和支持烟草的媒体接触减少预测感知危害增加。在吸烟者中,感知到的吸烟社会可接受度增加、反烟草媒体接触减少和支持烟草的媒体接触增加预测戒烟意愿(12.7%的吸烟者)。吸烟朋友增多、家庭限制增多、反烟草媒体接触减少和支持烟草的媒体接触增加预测过去一年戒烟尝试(19.2%)。

结论

研究结果支持无烟政策的重要性,但社会和媒体影响的作用却出人意料,这突显了需要更好地了解如何应对这些影响,特别是在吸烟率高的国家。