Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208950. eCollection 2018.
Social denormalisation of smoking can provide an environment that helps smokers to quit. This study examined which of three measures of anti-smoking social norms have the greatest influence on quitting-related cognitions and behaviours, and if this influence differs according to socioeconomic status (SES).
The Victorian Tracking Survey measured social norms among 1,348 (n(weighted) = 1,373) Australian adult smokers (aged 18-59) between 2012 and 2014, who were followed-up one week later. Weighted logistic regression analyses examined prospective associations of baseline subjective (family and friends' disapproval of smoking), injunctive (feeling embarrassed about being a smoker) and descriptive norms (living with someone who tried to quit in the past 12 months), with quitting-related cognitions and behaviours at follow-up. Data were weighted to account for telephony status (landline or mobile phone), sex and age. Analyses were adjusted for demographic characteristics, addiction level, tobacco control policies and quitting-related outcomes measured at baseline. Differences in associations between lower and higher SES smokers (based on educational attainment and area-based disadvantage) were examined through interaction terms and stratified analyses.
Sixty-four percent of participants (n(weighted) = 872) perceived disapproval from family and friends, 31% (n(weighted) = 419) felt embarrassed to be a smoker, and 11% (n(weighted) = 155) lived with a recent quitter. All three norms were associated with having set a firm date to quit in the next month and with engaging in smoking limiting behaviours. Embarrassment was also associated with an increased likelihood of talking about quitting and with making a quit attempt. Associations were mostly comparable for lower and higher SES smokers, with no significant negative rebound effects overall or among subgroups.
These findings indicate close others' disapproval and feelings of embarrassment most strongly motivate smokers to try to quit. If tobacco control policies or media campaigns further denormalise smoking, there should be no reason for concern that such denormalisation undermines cessation behaviours.
吸烟的社会去正常化可以提供一个帮助吸烟者戒烟的环境。本研究检验了三种反吸烟社会规范衡量标准中哪一种对戒烟相关认知和行为的影响最大,以及这种影响是否因社会经济地位(SES)而异。
维多利亚追踪调查于 2012 年至 2014 年期间测量了 1348 名(加权样本量为 1373 名)澳大利亚成年吸烟者(年龄在 18-59 岁之间)的社会规范,一周后对他们进行了随访。加权逻辑回归分析检验了基线时的主观规范(家人和朋友对吸烟的不赞成)、规范规范(对自己是吸烟者感到尴尬)和描述性规范(与过去 12 个月内试图戒烟的人同住)与随访时戒烟相关认知和行为的前瞻性关联。数据经过加权处理,以考虑电话状态(固定电话或移动电话)、性别和年龄。分析调整了人口统计学特征、成瘾程度、烟草控制政策以及基线测量的戒烟相关结果。通过交互项和分层分析检验了较低 SES 和较高 SES 吸烟者之间关联差异。
64%的参与者(加权样本量为 872 名)认为家人和朋友不赞成吸烟,31%(加权样本量为 419 名)对自己是吸烟者感到尴尬,11%(加权样本量为 155 名)与最近戒烟的人同住。所有三种规范都与设定下个月的坚定戒烟日期以及采取限制吸烟行为有关。尴尬感也与更有可能谈论戒烟和尝试戒烟有关。关联对于较低 SES 和较高 SES 吸烟者来说基本相似,总体或在亚组中没有明显的负面反弹效应。
这些发现表明,亲近的人的不赞成和尴尬感最能激励吸烟者试图戒烟。如果烟草控制政策或媒体运动进一步使吸烟去正常化,那么没有理由担心这种去正常化会破坏戒烟行为。