• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用深度度量学习和多模态学习预测 TCR 表位结合特异性。

Predicting TCR-Epitope Binding Specificity Using Deep Metric Learning and Multimodal Learning.

机构信息

Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2021 Apr 15;12(4):572. doi: 10.3390/genes12040572.

DOI:10.3390/genes12040572
PMID:33920780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8071129/
Abstract

Understanding the recognition of specific epitopes by cytotoxic T cells is a central problem in immunology. Although predicting binding between peptides and the class I Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) has had success, predicting interactions between T cell receptors (TCRs) and MHC class I-peptide complexes (pMHC) remains elusive. This paper utilizes a convolutional neural network model employing deep metric learning and multimodal learning to perform two critical tasks in TCR-epitope binding prediction: identifying the TCRs that bind a given epitope from a TCR repertoire, and identifying the binding epitope of a given TCR from a list of candidate epitopes. Our model can perform both tasks simultaneously and reveals that inconsistent preprocessing of TCR sequences can confound binding prediction. Applying a neural network interpretation method identifies key amino acid sequence patterns and positions within the TCR, important for binding specificity. Contrary to common assumption, known crystal structures of TCR-pMHC complexes show that the predicted salient amino acid positions are not necessarily the closest to the epitopes, implying that physical proximity may not be a good proxy for importance in determining TCR-epitope specificity. Our work thus provides an insight into the learned predictive features of TCR-epitope binding specificity and advances the associated classification tasks.

摘要

理解细胞毒性 T 细胞对特定表位的识别是免疫学的一个核心问题。虽然预测肽与 I 类主要组织相容性复合物 (MHC) 之间的结合已经取得了成功,但预测 T 细胞受体 (TCR) 与 MHC 类 I-肽复合物 (pMHC) 之间的相互作用仍然难以捉摸。本文利用卷积神经网络模型,采用深度度量学习和多模态学习,来执行 TCR-表位结合预测中的两个关键任务:从 TCR 库中识别与给定表位结合的 TCR,以及从候选表位列表中识别给定 TCR 的结合表位。我们的模型可以同时执行这两个任务,并揭示出 TCR 序列不一致的预处理可能会混淆结合预测。应用神经网络解释方法可以识别 TCR 中与结合特异性相关的关键氨基酸序列模式和位置。与常见的假设相反,已知的 TCR-pMHC 复合物晶体结构表明,预测的显著氨基酸位置不一定与表位最接近,这意味着在确定 TCR-表位特异性方面,物理接近度可能不是一个很好的代理。因此,我们的工作深入了解了 TCR-表位结合特异性的学习预测特征,并推进了相关的分类任务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/8071129/9e653ec63e73/genes-12-00572-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/8071129/1f286d815268/genes-12-00572-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/8071129/297b717311a8/genes-12-00572-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/8071129/db8a45722e02/genes-12-00572-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/8071129/44ca8acfa2c3/genes-12-00572-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/8071129/9e653ec63e73/genes-12-00572-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/8071129/1f286d815268/genes-12-00572-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/8071129/297b717311a8/genes-12-00572-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/8071129/db8a45722e02/genes-12-00572-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/8071129/44ca8acfa2c3/genes-12-00572-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52f/8071129/9e653ec63e73/genes-12-00572-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting TCR-Epitope Binding Specificity Using Deep Metric Learning and Multimodal Learning.使用深度度量学习和多模态学习预测 TCR 表位结合特异性。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Apr 15;12(4):572. doi: 10.3390/genes12040572.
2
A structural-based machine learning method to classify binding affinities between TCR and peptide-MHC complexes.一种基于结构的机器学习方法,用于分类 TCR 与肽-MHC 复合物之间的结合亲和力。
Mol Immunol. 2021 Nov;139:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2021.07.020. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
3
Structure-based prediction of T cell receptor:peptide-MHC interactions.基于结构的 T 细胞受体-肽-MHC 相互作用预测。
Elife. 2023 Jan 20;12:e82813. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82813.
4
Predicting TCR sequences for unseen antigen epitopes using structural and sequence features.使用结构和序列特征预测未知抗原表位的 TCR 序列。
Brief Bioinform. 2024 Mar 27;25(3). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae210.
5
GTE: a graph learning framework for prediction of T-cell receptors and epitopes binding specificity.GTE:用于预测 T 细胞受体和表位结合特异性的图学习框架。
Brief Bioinform. 2024 May 23;25(4). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae343.
6
Predicting CD4 T-cell epitopes based on antigen cleavage, MHCII presentation, and TCR recognition.基于抗原切割、MHCII 呈递和 TCR 识别预测 CD4 T 细胞表位。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 6;13(11):e0206654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206654. eCollection 2018.
7
TEINet: a deep learning framework for prediction of TCR-epitope binding specificity.TEINet:一种用于预测TCR-表位结合特异性的深度学习框架。
Brief Bioinform. 2023 Mar 19;24(2). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad086.
8
Accurate TCR-pMHC interaction prediction using a BERT-based transfer learning method.使用基于 BERT 的迁移学习方法进行准确的 TCR-pMHC 相互作用预测。
Brief Bioinform. 2023 Nov 22;25(1). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad436.
9
Identification of the cognate peptide-MHC target of T cell receptors using molecular modeling and force field scoring.使用分子建模和力场评分鉴定 T 细胞受体的同源肽-MHC 靶标。
Mol Immunol. 2018 Feb;94:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.12.019. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
10
TSpred: a robust prediction framework for TCR-epitope interactions using paired chain TCR sequence data.TSpred:一种基于 TCR 序列配对数据的 TCR-表位相互作用的稳健预测框架。
Bioinformatics. 2024 Aug 2;40(8). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae472.

引用本文的文献

1
A roadmap for T cell receptor-peptide-bound major histocompatibility complex binding prediction by machine learning: glimpse and foresight.通过机器学习预测T细胞受体-肽结合的主要组织相容性复合体的路线图:现状与展望。
Brief Bioinform. 2025 Jul 2;26(4). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf327.
2
T-cell receptor structures and predictive models reveal comparable alpha and beta chain structural diversity despite differing genetic complexity.T细胞受体结构和预测模型显示,尽管基因复杂性不同,但α链和β链的结构多样性具有可比性。
Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 4;8(1):362. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07708-6.
3
A comprehensive benchmarking for evaluating TCR embeddings in modeling TCR-epitope interactions.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of Specific TCR-Peptide Binding From Large Dictionaries of TCR-Peptide Pairs.从大型 TCR-肽对字典中预测特定 TCR-肽结合。
Front Immunol. 2020 Aug 25;11:1803. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01803. eCollection 2020.
2
Epigenetic engineering of yeast reveals dynamic molecular adaptation to methylation stress and genetic modulators of specific DNMT3 family members.酵母的表观遗传学工程揭示了对甲基化应激和特定 DNMT3 家族成员的遗传调节剂的动态分子适应。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 May 7;48(8):4081-4099. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa161.
3
VDJdb in 2019: database extension, new analysis infrastructure and a T-cell receptor motif compendium.
一种用于评估TCR嵌入在模拟TCR-表位相互作用中的综合基准测试。
Brief Bioinform. 2024 Nov 22;26(1). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf030.
4
The Evolving T Cell Receptor Recognition Code: The Rules Are More Like Guidelines.不断演变的T细胞受体识别密码:规则更像是指导方针。
Immunol Rev. 2025 Jan;329(1):e13439. doi: 10.1111/imr.13439.
5
Transformers meets neoantigen detection: a systematic literature review.变压器与新抗原检测:系统文献综述。
J Integr Bioinform. 2024 Jul 4;21(2). doi: 10.1515/jib-2023-0043. eCollection 2024 Jun 1.
6
APTAnet: an atom-level peptide-TCR interaction affinity prediction model.APTAnet:一种原子水平的肽-TCR相互作用亲和力预测模型。
Biophys Rep. 2024 Feb 29;10(1):1-14. doi: 10.52601/bpr.2023.230037.
7
Unified cross-modality integration and analysis of T cell receptors and T cell transcriptomes by low-resource-aware representation learning.基于资源感知表示学习的 T 细胞受体和 T 细胞转录组的统一跨模态整合和分析。
Cell Genom. 2024 May 8;4(5):100553. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100553. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
8
The physiological interactome of TCR-like antibody therapeutics in human tissues.TCR 样抗体治疗药物在人体组织中的生理相互作用组。
Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 16;15(1):3271. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47062-5.
9
Accurate TCR-pMHC interaction prediction using a BERT-based transfer learning method.使用基于 BERT 的迁移学习方法进行准确的 TCR-pMHC 相互作用预测。
Brief Bioinform. 2023 Nov 22;25(1). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad436.
10
A transfer-learning approach to predict antigen immunogenicity and T-cell receptor specificity.一种用于预测抗原免疫原性和 T 细胞受体特异性的迁移学习方法。
Elife. 2023 Sep 8;12:e85126. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85126.
2019 年的 VDJdb:数据库扩展、新的分析基础设施和 T 细胞受体基序汇编。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jan 8;48(D1):D1057-D1062. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz874.
4
T-Scan: A Genome-wide Method for the Systematic Discovery of T Cell Epitopes.T-Scan:一种用于系统发现 T 细胞表位的全基因组方法。
Cell. 2019 Aug 8;178(4):1016-1028.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.009.
5
PIRD: Pan Immune Repertoire Database.PIRD:全免疫受体数据库。
Bioinformatics. 2020 Feb 1;36(3):897-903. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz614.
6
IEDB-AR: immune epitope database-analysis resource in 2019.IEDB-AR:2019 年免疫表位数据库分析资源。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 2;47(W1):W502-W506. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz452.
7
Single Cell T Cell Receptor Sequencing: Techniques and Future Challenges.单细胞T细胞受体测序:技术与未来挑战
Front Immunol. 2018 Jul 18;9:1638. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01638. eCollection 2018.
8
Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy.多模态机器学习:一项综述与分类法
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2019 Feb;41(2):423-443. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2798607. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
9
Identification of the cognate peptide-MHC target of T cell receptors using molecular modeling and force field scoring.使用分子建模和力场评分鉴定 T 细胞受体的同源肽-MHC 靶标。
Mol Immunol. 2018 Feb;94:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.12.019. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
10
STCRDab: the structural T-cell receptor database.STCRDab:结构性 T 细胞受体数据库。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D406-D412. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx971.