• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三维有限元模型分析比较传统经胫骨单束与解剖双束前交叉韧带重建的生物力学差异

Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis.

作者信息

Kim Jae Gyoon, Kang Kyoung Tak, Wang Joon Ho

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 12;10(8):1625. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081625.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10081625
PMID:33921263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8069907/
Abstract

The purpose of our study was to analyze the graft contact stress at the tunnel after transtibial single-bundle (SB) and transportal double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. After transtibial SB (20 cases) and transportal DB (29 cases) ACL reconstruction, the three-dimensional image of each patient made by postoperative computed tomography was adjusted to the validation model of a normal knee and simulated SB and DB ACL reconstructions were created based on the average tunnel position and direction of each group. We also measured graft and contact stresses at the tunnel after a 134 N anterior load from 0° to 90° flexion. The graft and contact stresses became the greatest at 30° and 0° flexion, respectively. The total graft and contact stresses after DB ACL reconstruction were greater than those after SB ACL reconstruction from 0° to 30° and 0° to 90° knee flexion, respectively. However, the graft and contact stresses of each graft after DB ACL reconstruction were less than those after SB ACL reconstruction. In conclusion, the total graft and total contact stresses after DB ACL reconstruction are higher than those after SB ACL reconstruction from 0° to 30° and 0° to 90° knee flexion, respectively. However, the stresses of each graft after DB ACL reconstruction are about half of those after SB ACL reconstruction.

摘要

我们研究的目的是分析经胫骨单束(SB)和经关节镜双束(DB)前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后隧道处的移植物接触应力。在进行经胫骨SB(20例)和经关节镜DB(29例)ACL重建术后,将术后计算机断层扫描所生成的每位患者的三维图像调整至正常膝关节的验证模型,并基于每组的平均隧道位置和方向创建模拟的SB和DB ACL重建模型。我们还在0°至90°屈膝状态下施加134 N的前向负荷后,测量了隧道处的移植物和接触应力。移植物应力和接触应力分别在屈膝30°和0°时最大。在屈膝0°至30°以及0°至90°时,DB ACL重建术后的总移植物应力和接触应力分别大于SB ACL重建术后的相应应力。然而,DB ACL重建术后各移植物的应力小于SB ACL重建术后的应力。总之,在屈膝0°至30°以及0°至90°时,DB ACL重建术后的总移植物应力和总接触应力分别高于SB ACL重建术后的相应应力。然而,DB ACL重建术后各移植物的应力约为SB ACL重建术后的一半。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7781/8069907/bc4ea822f859/jcm-10-01625-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7781/8069907/bc4ea822f859/jcm-10-01625-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7781/8069907/bc4ea822f859/jcm-10-01625-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis.使用三维有限元模型分析比较传统经胫骨单束与解剖双束前交叉韧带重建的生物力学差异
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 12;10(8):1625. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081625.
2
Comparison of Knee Kinematics After Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction via the Medial Portal Technique With a Central Femoral Tunnel and an Eccentric Femoral Tunnel and After Anatomic Double-Bundle Reconstruction: A Human Cadaveric Study.经内侧入路技术分别采用中央股骨隧道和偏心股骨隧道进行单束前交叉韧带重建后与解剖双束重建后的膝关节运动学比较:一项人体尸体研究
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):126-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546515611646. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
3
Biomechanical comparison of graft structures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建中移植物结构的生物力学比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Feb;25(2):559-568. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4316-6. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
4
Eight-year results of transtibial nonanatomic single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Clinical, radiologic outcomes and survivorship.经胫骨非解剖单束与双束前交叉韧带重建的八年结果:临床、影像学结果及生存率
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 May-Aug;27(2):2309499019840827. doi: 10.1177/2309499019840827.
5
A Biomechanical Comparison of Single-, Double-, and Triple-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using a Hamstring Tendon Graft.采用腘绳肌腱移植物的单束、双束和三束前交叉韧带重建的生物力学比较。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Mar;35(3):896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.124. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
6
Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical cadaveric study of a rectangular quadriceps and bone--patellar tendon--bone graft configuration versus a round hamstring graft.单束前交叉韧带重建:一种矩形股四头肌和骨-髌腱-骨移植物与圆形腘绳肌移植物的生物力学尸体研究。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):1981-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
7
Clinical and three-dimensional computed tomographic comparison between ACL transportal versus ACL transtibial single-bundle reconstructions with hamstrings.前交叉韧带(ACL)经胫骨隧道与经胫骨单束腘绳肌重建术的临床及三维计算机断层扫描比较
Knee. 2014 Dec;21(6):1203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 27.
8
Biomechanical comparison of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: an in vitro study.解剖式单束和双束前交叉韧带重建的生物力学比较:一项体外研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1595-604. doi: 10.1177/0363546513487065. Epub 2013 May 21.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using the quadriceps tendon.使用股四头肌肌腱对解剖单束和双束前交叉韧带重建技术进行生物力学评估。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Mar;23(3):687-95. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3462-y. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
10
[Anatomical ACL reconstruction by a double- versus a single-bundle technique. Prospective randomised study of short-term clinical results].[双束与单束技术用于解剖学前交叉韧带重建:短期临床结果的前瞻性随机研究]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81(1):40-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite element study of stress distribution in medial UKA under varied lower limb alignment.下肢对线变化时内侧 UKA 中应力分布的有限元研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 25;14(1):25397. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74145-6.
2
Finite element analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: A comparison of the mechanical properties of all-inside fixation and traditional fixation.前交叉韧带重建技术的有限元分析:全内置固定与传统固定力学性能的比较
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Aug 2;12:1438839. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1438839. eCollection 2024.
3
Anterior cruciate ligament injury should not be considered a contraindication for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Finite element analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis.单束与双束前交叉韧带重建的生物力学比较:一项荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Mar 12;32(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00033-8.
2
The effects of graft size and insertion site location during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on intercondylar notch impingement.前交叉韧带重建术中移植物大小和植入部位对髁间窝撞击的影响。
Knee. 2017 Jun;24(3):525-535. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
3
Biomechanical comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing for unicomparmental knee arthroplasty using finite element analysis.
前交叉韧带损伤不应被视为内侧单髁膝关节置换术的禁忌证:有限元分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 12;19(3):e0299649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299649. eCollection 2024.
4
Can lateral tenodesis improve the rotational stability of the ACL reconstruction? A finite element analysis.外侧止点重建能否提高 ACL 重建的旋转稳定性?一项有限元分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 27;19(2):e0293161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293161. eCollection 2024.
5
Influence of knee flexion angle on graft bending angle during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transportal technique.经皮入路前交叉韧带重建术中膝关节屈曲角度对移植物弯曲角度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 22;13(1):13638. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41002-x.
6
Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis.不同股骨隧道位置在后交叉韧带重建中的有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Feb 4;24(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06161-y.
7
Evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament surgical reconstruction through finite element analysis.通过有限元分析评估前交叉韧带的手术重建。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 16;12(1):8044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11601-1.
采用有限元分析对单髁膝关节置换术中固定和活动平台假体的生物力学进行比较。
J Orthop Res. 2014 Feb;32(2):338-45. doi: 10.1002/jor.22499. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
4
Effect of ACL reconstruction graft size on simulated Lachman testing: a finite element analysis.前交叉韧带重建移植物大小对模拟拉赫曼试验的影响:有限元分析
Iowa Orthop J. 2013;33:70-7.
5
Deterioration of stress distribution due to tunnel creation in single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.由于单束和双束前交叉韧带重建术中隧道的创建,导致应力分布恶化。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2012 Jul;40(7):1554-67. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0517-4.
6
Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建中经胫骨技术与经髌旁入路技术的股骨移植物弯曲角度和隧道长度比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Aug;20(8):1584-93. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1781-9. Epub 2011 Nov 27.
7
Tension changes within the bundles of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at different knee flexion angles: a study using a 3-dimensional finite element model.在不同膝关节弯曲角度下,解剖双束前交叉韧带重建的束内张力变化:一项使用三维有限元模型的研究。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Oct;27(10):1400-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
8
Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: Basic science.解剖学单束和双束前交叉韧带重建,第 1 部分:基础科学。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1789-99. doi: 10.1177/0363546511402659. Epub 2011 May 19.
9
Evaluation of the intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CT.利用 3D-CT 评估解剖双束前交叉韧带重建术后髁间顶撞击
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Apr;19(4):674-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1331-x. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
10
Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel length: cadaveric analysis comparing anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique.前交叉韧带股骨隧道长度:比较前内侧入路与经皮入路技术的尸体分析。
Arthroscopy. 2010 Oct;26(10):1357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.014.