Suppr超能文献

[Antegrade endoscopic treatment of calculi of the ureter].

作者信息

Viville C

机构信息

Service d'Urologie, Clinique Bethesda, Strasbourg.

出版信息

J Urol (Paris). 1988;94(1):21-5.

PMID:3392401
Abstract

The author has treated 29 ureteric stones, situated in the lumbar ureter in 27 cases, via an antegrade endoscopic approach. On only one occasion, at the beginning of the series, the attempt failed due to loss of the nephrostomy tract. Another attempt failed in a case of an unusually hard stone in the pelvic segment of a congenital megaureter. In 18 out of 29 cases (62%), the stone was pushed back into the renal cavities and was extracted by percutaneous nephrotomy, in the absence of extracorporeal lithotripsy. The other 11 cases were treated by in situ lithotripsy (10 cases) or by Dormia basket extraction (1 case). Apart from the complete failures indicated above, there was also on partial failure following electric in situ lithotripsy in the iliac ureter. 26/29 cases were treated with complete success. There were no immediate complications and no cases of secondary stenosis. After a comparative analysis of the published series, the author concludes on the superiority of antegrade endoscopic treatment of lumbar ureteric stones over retrograde treatment by ascending ureteroscopy.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验