Suppr超能文献

基于光谱反射率数据的偏最小二乘和高斯过程回归的叶类花青苷含量反演。

Leaf Anthocyanin Content Retrieval with Partial Least Squares and Gaussian Process Regression from Spectral Reflectance Data.

机构信息

Institute of Applied Remote Sensing and Information Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Key Laboratory of Agricultural Remote Sensing and Information System, Zhejiang Province, China, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 28;21(9):3078. doi: 10.3390/s21093078.

Abstract

Leaf pigment content retrieval is an essential research field in remote sensing. However, retrieval studies on anthocyanins are quite rare compared to those on chlorophylls and carotenoids. Given the critical physiological significance of anthocyanins, this situation should be improved. In this study, using the reflectance, partial least squares regression (PLSR) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) were sought to retrieve the leaf anthocyanin content. To our knowledge, this is the first time that PLSR and GPR have been employed in such studies. The results showed that, based on the logarithmic transformation of the reflectance (log(1/)) with 564 and 705 nm, the GPR model performed the best (R/RMSE (nmol/cm): 0.93/2.18 in the calibration, and 0.93/2.20 in the validation) of all the investigated methods. The PLSR model involved four wavelengths and achieved relatively low accuracy (R/RMSE (nmol/cm): 0.87/2.88 in calibration, and 0.88/2.89 in validation). GPR apparently outperformed PLSR. The reason was likely that the non-linear property made GPR more effective than the linear PLSR in characterizing the relationship for the absorbance vs. content of anthocyanins. For GPR, selected wavelengths around the green peak and red edge region (one from each) were promising to build simple and accurate two-wavelength models with R > 0.90.

摘要

叶片色素含量反演是遥感领域的一个重要研究方向。然而,与叶绿素和类胡萝卜素相比,花青素的反演研究还相当少见。鉴于花青素具有重要的生理意义,这种情况应该得到改善。在本研究中,我们寻求利用反射率、偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)和高斯过程回归(GPR)来反演叶片花青素含量。据我们所知,这是首次将 PLSR 和 GPR 应用于此类研究。结果表明,基于对数变换的反射率(log(1/)),在 564nm 和 705nm 处,GPR 模型的表现最佳(R/RMSE(nmol/cm):校准中为 0.93/2.18,验证中为 0.93/2.20)。所研究的所有方法中,PLSR 模型涉及四个波长,精度相对较低(R/RMSE(nmol/cm):校准中为 0.87/2.88,验证中为 0.88/2.89)。GPR 明显优于 PLSR。原因可能是,与线性 PLSR 相比,GPR 的非线性特性使其在表征花青素吸光度与含量之间的关系方面更有效。对于 GPR,选择绿光峰和红边区域附近的波长(各一个),有望构建简单而准确的两波长模型,R>0.90。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c13/8125520/e0bdc950bfeb/sensors-21-03078-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验