College of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;24(19):6309. doi: 10.3390/s24196309.
This study explored the quantitative inversion of the chlorophyll content in seedling leaves under drought stress and analyzed the factors influencing the chlorophyll content from multiple perspectives to obtain the optimal model. seedlings were selected as the experimental materials for the potted water control experiments. Four drought stress treatments were set up to obtain four types of seedlings: one pair of top leaves (T1), two pairs of leaves (T2), three pairs of leaves (T3), and four pairs of leaves (T4). In total, 23 spectral transformations were selected, and the following four methods were adopted to construct the prediction model, select the best spectral preprocessing method, and explore the influence of water bands: partial least squares modeling with all spectral bands (all-band partial least squares, AB-PLS), principal component analysis partial least squares (PCA-PLS), correlation analysis partial least squares (CA-PLS), correlation analysis (water band) partial least squares, ([CA(W)-PLS]), and vegetation index modeling. Based on the prediction accuracy and the uniformity of different leaf positions, the optimal model was systematically explored. The results of the analysis of spectral reflectance showed significant differences at different leaf positions. The sensitive bands of chlorophyll were located near 550 nm, whereas the sensitive bands of water were located near 1440 and 1920 nm. The results of the vegetation index models indicate that the multiple-index models outperformed the single-index models. Accuracy decreased as the number of indicators decreased. We found that different model construction methods matched different optimal spectral preprocessing methods. First derivative spectra (R') was the best preprocessing method for the AB-PLS, PCA-PLS, and CA-PLS models, whereas the inverse log spectra (log(1/R)) was the best preprocessing method for the CA(W)-PLS model. Among the 14 indices, the green normalized difference vegetation index (GNDVI) was most correlated with the chlorophyll content sensitivity indices, and the water index (WI) was most correlated with the water sensitive indices. At the same time, the water band affected the cross validation accuracy. When characteristic bands were used for modeling, the cross validation accuracy was significantly increased. In contrast, when vegetation indices were used for modeling, the accuracy of the cross validation increased slightly but its predictive ability was reduced; thus, these changes could be ignored. We found that leaf position also affected the prediction accuracy, with the first pair of top leaves exhibiting the worst predictive ability. This was a bottleneck that limited predictive capability. Finally, we found that the CA(W)-PLS model was optimal. The model was based on 23 spectral transformations, four PLS construction methods, water bands, and different leaf positions to ensure systematicity, stability, and applicability.
本研究旨在对干旱胁迫下幼苗叶片中叶绿素含量进行定量反演,并从多个角度分析影响叶绿素含量的因素,以获得最佳模型。选用盆栽控水实验的实生苗作为实验材料,设置 4 种干旱胁迫处理,得到 4 种类型的实生苗:一对顶叶(T1)、两对叶(T2)、三对叶(T3)和四对叶(T4)。共选取 23 种光谱变换,采用以下四种方法构建预测模型,选择最佳光谱预处理方法,探讨水带的影响:全谱带偏最小二乘建模(all-band partial least squares,AB-PLS)、主成分分析偏最小二乘(PCA-PLS)、相关分析偏最小二乘(CA-PLS)、相关分析(水带)偏最小二乘([CA(W)-PLS])和植被指数建模。基于预测精度和不同叶片位置的均匀性,系统地探索了最佳模型。光谱反射率分析结果表明,不同叶片位置存在显著差异。叶绿素的敏感波段位于近 550nm,而水的敏感波段位于近 1440nm 和 1920nm。植被指数模型的结果表明,多指标模型优于单指标模型。随着指标数量的减少,精度降低。我们发现,不同的模型构建方法与不同的最佳光谱预处理方法相匹配。一阶导数光谱(R')是 AB-PLS、PCA-PLS 和 CA-PLS 模型的最佳预处理方法,而对数倒数光谱(log(1/R))是 CA(W)-PLS 模型的最佳预处理方法。在 14 个指标中,归一化差异绿度指数(GNDVI)与叶绿素含量敏感指数相关性最高,水分指数(WI)与水分敏感指数相关性最高。同时,水带影响交叉验证精度。当使用特征带进行建模时,交叉验证精度显著提高。相比之下,当使用植被指数进行建模时,交叉验证的精度略有提高,但预测能力降低;因此,这些变化可以忽略不计。我们发现叶片位置也会影响预测精度,第一对顶叶的预测能力最差。这是限制预测能力的瓶颈。最后,我们发现 CA(W)-PLS 模型是最优的。该模型基于 23 种光谱变换、4 种 PLS 构建方法、水带和不同叶片位置,以确保系统性、稳定性和适用性。