• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年与家长在《长处与困难问卷》上的一致性:基于澳大利亚全国代表性样本的分析。

Concordance between adolescents and parents on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Analysis of an Australian nationally representative sample.

机构信息

Metro North Mental Health, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;55(11):1058-1070. doi: 10.1177/00048674211009610. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1177/00048674211009610
PMID:33926246
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Differences between adolescent self-reported and parent-reported emotional and behavioural difficulties may influence psychiatric epidemiological research. This study examined concordance between adolescents and their parents about mental health symptoms using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

METHODS

The study comprised a randomly selected, nationally representative sample of adolescents aged 11-17 years who participated in the Second Australian Child and Adolescent Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing ( = 2967). Matched adolescent and parent responses across the five Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire subscales (emotional problems, hyperactivity, peer problems, conduct problems and prosocial behaviour), as well as total difficulties and total impact scores were examined to estimate concordance. Concordance patterns were analysed by sex, after stratifying the sample by age group (younger adolescents: 11-14 years; older adolescents: 15-17 years).

RESULTS

Concordance was 86.7% for total difficulties, 77.5% for total impact and ranged from 82.4% to 94.3% across the five Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire subscales. There were no differences in concordance between sexes on the total difficulties score. Older females were more likely to disagree with their parents about emotional problems compared to males of the same age. Younger males were more likely to disagree with their parents compared to same-aged females about peer problems, hyperactivity, conduct problems and prosocial skills, as well as the impact of their problems. Older males were more likely to disagree with their parents about their prosocial skills compared to older females.

CONCLUSION

Overall, concordance between adolescents and parents on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire was largely driven by the high proportion of respondents who reported having no problems. Discordance on a subscale increased as the prevalence of problems in a sex and age demographic subgroup increased. These findings highlight the need for a multi-informant approach to detect emotional and behavioural difficulties in adolescents, particularly when assessing the impact of symptoms, as this subscale had the lowest concordance.

摘要

目的

青少年自我报告和父母报告的情绪和行为困难之间的差异可能会影响精神病学的流行病学研究。本研究使用长处和困难问卷(SDQ)检查了青少年及其父母在心理健康症状方面的一致性。

方法

该研究包括了随机选择的、具有全国代表性的 11-17 岁青少年样本,他们参加了第二次澳大利亚儿童和青少年心理健康和幸福感调查(n=2967)。检查了五个 SDQ 分量表(情绪问题、多动、同伴问题、品行问题和亲社会行为)以及总困难和总影响评分中青少年和父母的匹配反应,以估计一致性。按性别分析了一致性模式,并按年龄组(年龄较小的青少年:11-14 岁;年龄较大的青少年:15-17 岁)对样本进行分层。

结果

总困难的一致性为 86.7%,总影响的一致性为 77.5%,五个 SDQ 分量表的范围从 82.4%到 94.3%。在总困难评分上,性别之间没有一致性差异。与同年龄的男性相比,年龄较大的女性更有可能不同意其父母对情绪问题的看法。与同年龄的女性相比,年龄较小的男性更有可能不同意其父母对同伴问题、多动、品行问题和亲社会技能以及问题的影响的看法。与年龄较大的女性相比,年龄较大的男性更有可能不同意其父母对其亲社会技能的看法。

结论

总体而言,青少年和父母在 SDQ 上的一致性在很大程度上取决于报告没有问题的受访者比例很高。在性别和年龄亚组中,问题的患病率增加,子量表上的不一致性增加。这些发现强调了需要采用多信息源的方法来检测青少年的情绪和行为困难,特别是在评估症状的影响时,因为该子量表的一致性最低。

相似文献

1
Concordance between adolescents and parents on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Analysis of an Australian nationally representative sample.青少年与家长在《长处与困难问卷》上的一致性:基于澳大利亚全国代表性样本的分析。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;55(11):1058-1070. doi: 10.1177/00048674211009610. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
2
Measuring adolescent mental health around the globe: psychometric properties of the self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in South Africa, and comparison with UK, Australian and Chinese data.全球青少年心理健康测量:南非自我报告《长处与困难问卷》的心理测量特性,以及与英国、澳大利亚和中国数据的比较。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Aug;27(4):369-380. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016001207. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
3
[Towards a better assessment of child and adolescent mental health status. Polish version of strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Experiences from two population studies].[迈向对儿童和青少年心理健康状况的更好评估。优势与困难问卷波兰语版。两项人群研究的经验]
Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):13-24.
4
Psychological problems of Iranian children and adolescents: parent report form of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.伊朗儿童和青少年的心理问题:长处与困难问卷家长报告表
J Ment Health. 2014 Dec;23(6):287-91. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2014.924049. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
5
Emotional and behavioural difficulties among children and adolescents attending "ART teen clubs" in Mzuzu City in northern Malawi: a cross-sectional study.马拉维北部姆祖祖市“ART 青少年俱乐部”中儿童和青少年的情绪和行为困难:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jan 13;24(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04504-1.
6
Revising the self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire for cross-country comparisons of adolescent mental health problems: the SDQ-R.修订自陈式长处与困难问卷以进行青少年心理健康问题的跨国比较:SDQ-R。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 May 3;29:e35. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000246.
7
Evaluating the psychometric properties of the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a nationally representative sample of Canadian children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years.评估家长评定的 Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire 在加拿大 6 至 17 岁儿童和青少年全国代表性样本中的心理计量特性。
Health Rep. 2020 Aug 19;31(8):13-20. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202000800002-eng.
8
Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study.德国儿童和青少年普通人群中父母版优势与困难问卷的心理测量特性:贝拉研究结果
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 1:99-105. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1011-2.
9
Normative Data of the Self-Report Version of the German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Epidemiological Setting.德国优势与困难问卷自陈版在流行病学背景下的常模数据。
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2018 Nov;46(6):523-533. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000589. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
Prevalence and correlates of bullying victimisation and perpetration in a nationally representative sample of Australian youth.在澳大利亚全国代表性青少年样本中,欺凌受害和欺凌实施的流行率及其相关因素。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;51(9):909-920. doi: 10.1177/0004867417707819. Epub 2017 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Caregiver characteristics and behaviors: quantitative associations with child depression amongst refugees in Uganda.照顾者的特征与行为:乌干达难民中儿童抑郁的定量关联
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 Jan 30;12:e26. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.2. eCollection 2025.
2
District Functional Unit for Adolescents 2022: a pilot project in Italy to detect mental health strengths and difficulties among youth.2022年青少年地区功能单元:意大利一项旨在发现青少年心理健康优势与困难的试点项目。
Res Psychother. 2025 Mar 31;28(1). doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2025.831. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
3
Longitudinal pathways between childhood BMI, body dissatisfaction, and adolescent depression: an observational study using the UK Millenium Cohort Study.
儿童 BMI、身体不满与青少年抑郁之间的纵向关系:利用英国千禧年队列研究进行的观察性研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;11(1):47-55. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00365-6.
4
Adaptation of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Use in the Republic of Georgia.《长处与困难问卷》在格鲁吉亚共和国的适应性调整。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 1;24(4):128-135. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221003. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
A comparison of sleep-wake patterns among school-age children and adolescents in Hong Kong before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.香港学龄儿童和青少年在 COVID-19 大流行前后的睡眠-觉醒模式比较。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2023 Apr 1;19(4):749-757. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10422.
6
Mental health symptoms in children and adolescents during COVID-19 in Australia.澳大利亚新冠疫情期间儿童和青少年的心理健康症状
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;57(2):213-229. doi: 10.1177/00048674221090174. Epub 2022 Apr 12.