• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《长处与困难问卷》在格鲁吉亚共和国的适应性调整。

Adaptation of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Use in the Republic of Georgia.

作者信息

Gabunia Maia, Zirakashvili Medea, Mebonia Nana, Mikiahvili Tamar, Lomidze Giorgi, Leventhal Bennett L, Shin Kim Young

机构信息

Georgian Academy of Childhood Disability, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.

出版信息

Alpha Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 1;24(4):128-135. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221003. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221003
PMID:37969476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10645136/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children in low-resource countries like Georgia often have limited access to assessment measures for mental health care services. This study adapts and validates the mental health screening tool the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for use in Georgian children.

METHODS

A total of 16 654 children were assessed by a parent and/or teacher using Georgian-adapted Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to assess the discriminative validity of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaires and to establish an optimal cutoff score.

RESULTS

Data from 15 738 parents- and 13 560 teachers-administered Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire were analyzed. The internal consistency analysis showed Cronbach's alpha to be 0.625 and 0.621 for parent- and teacher-administered Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire, respectively. The area under the curve (95% CI) shows that the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire can differentiate risk group children from typically developing peers: parent-administered questionnaires-0.629 (0.556-0.702) and teacher-administered questionnaires-0.680 (0.611-0.789). Parent-administered Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire has a cutoff value of 16 or more with 92.5% of sensitivity and teacher-administered Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire-14 or more with a sensitivity of 85.6%.

CONCLUSION

The study finds that the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire is a valid screening instrument and does not depend on the informant-parent or teacher. It suggests that with appropriate cultural adaptation, the SDQ can be used in the Republic of Georgia to identify children at risk for mental disorders and help guide resource allocation.

摘要

背景

在格鲁吉亚这样资源匮乏的国家,儿童往往难以获得心理健康护理服务的评估手段。本研究对心理健康筛查工具——优势与困难问卷进行了改编和验证,以供格鲁吉亚儿童使用。

方法

共有16654名儿童由家长和/或教师使用格鲁吉亚语改编版的优势与困难问卷进行评估。进行了受试者工作特征分析,以评估优势与困难问卷的区分效度,并确定最佳临界值。

结果

对来自15738名家长和13560名教师所使用的优势与困难问卷的数据进行了分析。内部一致性分析显示,家长版和教师版优势与困难问卷的克朗巴哈系数分别为0.625和0.621。曲线下面积(95%置信区间)表明,优势与困难问卷能够区分风险组儿童和发育正常的同龄人:家长版问卷为0.629(0.556 - 0.702),教师版问卷为0.680(0.611 - 0.789)。家长版优势与困难问卷的临界值为16分及以上,灵敏度为92.5%;教师版优势与困难问卷的临界值为14分及以上,灵敏度为85.6%。

结论

该研究发现优势与困难问卷是一种有效的筛查工具,且不依赖于信息提供者是家长还是教师。这表明,经过适当的文化改编后,优势与困难问卷可在格鲁吉亚共和国用于识别有精神障碍风险的儿童,并帮助指导资源分配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d044/10645136/2cecf16fe907/ap-24-4-128_f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d044/10645136/77865b28661e/ap-24-4-128_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d044/10645136/0eb26f99c61a/ap-24-4-128_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d044/10645136/0f3c97599032/ap-24-4-128_f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d044/10645136/2cecf16fe907/ap-24-4-128_f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d044/10645136/77865b28661e/ap-24-4-128_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d044/10645136/0eb26f99c61a/ap-24-4-128_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d044/10645136/0f3c97599032/ap-24-4-128_f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d044/10645136/2cecf16fe907/ap-24-4-128_f004.jpg

相似文献

1
Adaptation of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Use in the Republic of Georgia.《长处与困难问卷》在格鲁吉亚共和国的适应性调整。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 1;24(4):128-135. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221003. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Validity and reliability of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in 5-6 year olds: differences by gender or by parental education?5-6 岁儿童长处和困难问卷的有效性和可靠性:性别或父母教育程度的差异?
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036805. Epub 2012 May 18.
3
Screening for mental health disorders in active childhood epilepsy: population-based data.活动性儿童癫痫患者心理健康障碍的筛查:基于人群的数据。
Epilepsy Res. 2014 Dec;108(10):1917-26. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.09.028. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
4
The Reliability and Validity of the Malay Parent-Report Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.马来文版优势与困难问卷家长报告版本的信度与效度
Malays J Med Sci. 2019 Jan;26(1):125-137. doi: 10.21315/mjms2019.26.1.12. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
5
Comparing parent and teacher assessments of mental health in elementary school children.比较家长与教师对小学生心理健康状况的评估。
Scand J Public Health. 2016 Mar;44(2):168-76. doi: 10.1177/1403494815610929. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
6
Finnish norms for young children on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.芬兰幼儿优势与困难问卷常模。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;68(7):433-42. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2013.853833. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
7
Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study.德国儿童和青少年普通人群中父母版优势与困难问卷的心理测量特性:贝拉研究结果
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 1:99-105. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1011-2.
8
Dutch norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - parent form for children aged 2-18 years.荷兰版《长处和困难问卷》(SDQ)- 家长用 2-18 岁儿童版。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 14;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0948-1.
9
Validation of the SDQ in a multi-ethnic population of young children.SDQ 在多民族幼儿人群中的验证。
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Feb;24(1):26-32. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt100. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
10

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic comparison of intercultural and indigenous cultural dance education from a global perspective (2010-2024).从全球视角对跨文化舞蹈教育与本土文化舞蹈教育进行的系统比较(2010 - 2024)
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 26;15:1493457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1493457. eCollection 2024.
2
Commentary: Adaptation of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Use in the Republic of Georgia.评论:《长处与困难问卷》在格鲁吉亚共和国的适用性调整
Alpha Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 1;24(4):136-137. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.110723. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Internalizing problems, externalizing problems, and prosocial behavior - three dimensions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): A study among South African adolescents.内化问题、外化问题和亲社会行为——长处和困难问卷(SDQ)的三个维度:南非青少年研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Aug;63(4):415-425. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12815. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
Rationale and methods of the 'Northern Ireland Youth Wellbeing Survey' and initial findings from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.北爱尔兰青年幸福调查的原理和方法,以及从优势与困难问卷中得出的初步结果。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;27(3):670-685. doi: 10.1177/13591045221075525. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
3
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire self-report-, parent-, and teacher version in children with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
《智力和发育障碍儿童的长处和困难问卷(自我报告版、家长版和教师版)》。
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Apr;123:104194. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104194. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Dysregulation Profile in Italian Early Adolescents.意大利青少年早期优势与困难问卷失调量表的心理测量特性
Children (Basel). 2021 Dec 3;8(12):1123. doi: 10.3390/children8121123.
5
At-risk early adolescents profiles in the community: A cluster analysis using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire.社区中处于危险中的早期青少年特征:使用长处和困难问卷的聚类分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Nov;305:114209. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114209. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
6
Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Children.原住民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民儿童优势与困难问卷的探索性图表分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 18;12:573825. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573825. eCollection 2021.
7
Teacher Versus Parent Informant Measurement Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.教师与家长信息源测量的《长处和困难问卷》不变性。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Oct 18;46(10):1249-1257. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab062.
8
Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children.《澳大利亚儿童纵向研究中长处和困难问卷的探索性图分析》
Assessment. 2022 Dec;29(8):1622-1640. doi: 10.1177/10731911211024338. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
9
Validation of the parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen mental health problems among school-age children in Mongolia.验证父母版长处和困难问卷(SDQ)在蒙古筛查学龄儿童心理健康问题的适用性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03218-x.
10
Concordance between adolescents and parents on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Analysis of an Australian nationally representative sample.青少年与家长在《长处与困难问卷》上的一致性:基于澳大利亚全国代表性样本的分析。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;55(11):1058-1070. doi: 10.1177/00048674211009610. Epub 2021 Apr 30.