Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028, Lisbon, Portugal.
IDMEC. Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001, Lisbon, Portugal.
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03227-w.
Around 25 to 30% of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not respond to treatment. These patients have the longest duration of disease and the worst prognosis. Following years of research on this topic, insight has emerged as a potential explanation for this therapeutic resistance. Therefore, it has become important to characterize OCD patients with poor insight. Few studies have focused on the neuropsychological and cognitive characteristics of these patients.
To help fill this gap, we divided 57 patients into two groups, one with good insight and the other with poor insight, assessed their neuropsychological functions-through a Rey's figure test, a California verbal learning test, a Toulouse-Piéron test and a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)-and compared the results with those of a paired control group.
The statistical analysis, with a significance level of 95%, revealed differences in the executive function tests, and particularly in the WCST (p ≤ 0.001) and trail-making-test (TMT A/B) (p = 0.002).
These differences suggest that the neuropsychological profile of poor-insight patients is different from their good-insight counterparts, emphasize the role played by the executive functions in insight and highlights the need for more accurate neurocognitive research and treatment.
大约 25%至 30%的强迫症(OCD)患者对治疗没有反应。这些患者的疾病持续时间最长,预后最差。经过多年对这一课题的研究,洞察力已经成为治疗抵抗的一个潜在解释。因此,对洞察力差的 OCD 患者进行特征描述变得很重要。很少有研究关注这些患者的神经心理学和认知特征。
为了帮助填补这一空白,我们将 57 名患者分为两组,一组洞察力好,另一组洞察力差,通过 Rey 氏数字测试、加州语言学习测试、图卢兹-皮隆测试和威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)评估他们的神经心理学功能,并将结果与配对对照组进行比较。
具有 95%置信水平的统计分析显示,在执行功能测试中存在差异,特别是在 WCST(p≤0.001)和连线测试 A/B(p=0.002)中存在差异。
这些差异表明,洞察力差的患者的神经心理学特征与其洞察力好的患者不同,强调了执行功能在洞察力中的作用,并突出了需要进行更准确的神经认知研究和治疗。