Suppr超能文献

肺静脉隔离术后非典型房性心动过速与复发性心房颤动的消融结果对比。

Ablation outcomes for atypical atrial flutter versus recurrent atrial fibrillation following index pulmonary vein isolation.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Jun;32(6):1631-1639. doi: 10.1111/jce.15051. Epub 2021 May 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data related to electrophysiologic characteristics of atypical atrial flutter (AFL) following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and its prognostic value on repeat ablation success are limited.

METHODS

We studied consecutive patients who underwent a repeat left atrial (LA) ablation procedure for either recurrent AF or atypical AFL, at least 3 months after index AF ablation, between January 2012 and July 2019. The demographics, clinical history, procedural data, complications, and 1-year arrhythmia-free survival rates were recorded for each subject after the first repeat ablation.

RESULTS

A total of 336 patients were included in our study. Among these 336 patients, 102 underwent a repeat ablation procedure for atypical AFL and 234 underwent a repeat ablation procedure for recurrent AF. The mean age was 63.7 ± 10.7 years, and 72.6% of patients were men. The atypical AFL cohort had significantly higher LA diameters (4.6 vs. 4.4 cm, p = .04) and LA volume indices (LAVi; 85.1 vs. 75.4 ml/m , p = .03) compared to AF patients at repeat ablation. Atypical AFL patients were more likely to have had index radiofrequency (RF) ablation (as opposed to cryoballoon) than recurrent AF patients (98% vs. 81%, p = .01). Atypical AFLs were roof-dependent in 35.6% and peri-mitral in 23.8% of cases. Major complications at repeat ablation occurred in 0.9% of the total cohort. Arrhythmia-free survival at one year was significantly higher in the recurrent atypical AFL compared to the recurrent AF cohort (75.5 vs. 65.0%, p = .04).

CONCLUSION

In our series, roof-dependent flutter is the most common form of atypical atrial flutter post AF ablation. Patients developing atypical AFL after index AF ablation have greater LA dimensions than patients with recurrent AF. The success rate of first repeat ablation is significantly higher among patients with recurrent atypical AFL as compared to recurrent AF after index AF ablation.

摘要

背景

关于房颤消融术后非典型房扑(AFL)的电生理特征及其对再次消融成功的预后价值的数据有限。

方法

我们研究了 2012 年 1 月至 2019 年 7 月间,至少在初次房颤消融后 3 个月,因复发房颤或非典型 AFL 而行左房(LA)再次消融的连续患者。每位患者在首次重复消融后记录其人口统计学、临床病史、手术数据、并发症和 1 年无心律失常生存率。

结果

共有 336 名患者纳入本研究。其中 102 名患者因非典型 AFL 而行重复消融,234 名患者因复发房颤而行重复消融。平均年龄为 63.7±10.7 岁,72.6%的患者为男性。与房颤患者相比,非典型 AFL 组的左房直径(4.6 对 4.4cm,p=0.04)和左房容积指数(LAVi;85.1 对 75.4ml/m2,p=0.03)显著更高。与复发房颤患者相比,非典型 AFL 患者更有可能接受初次射频(RF)消融(98%对 81%,p=0.01)而非冷冻球囊消融。35.6%的非典型 AFL 呈房顶依赖性,23.8%呈二尖瓣环依赖性。再次消融的主要并发症发生率为 0.9%。与复发房颤患者相比,复发非典型 AFL 患者一年时无心律失常生存率显著更高(75.5%对 65.0%,p=0.04)。

结论

在我们的研究中,房顶依赖性房扑是非典型房颤消融术后最常见的形式。与初次房颤消融后复发房颤患者相比,初次房颤消融后复发非典型 AFL 的患者左房尺寸更大。与初次房颤消融后复发房颤患者相比,初次房颤消融后复发非典型 AFL 患者的首次重复消融成功率显著更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验