Division of Pediatric Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Aug;56(8):2686-2694. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25450. Epub 2021 May 13.
To assess the association between commonly obtained endoscopic and serologic data and bronchoalveolar lavage pepsin assay (BAL) results in children with chronic cough.
We performed a retrospective chart review of 72 children with a BAL pepsin obtained through our Aerodigestive Center over an 18-month period. BAL outcomes include evidence of viral, bacterial, or fungal infection, presence of lipid-laden macrophages, and cytology (eosinophils, neutrophils, and lymphocytes). Gastrointestinal outcomes include esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and pH impedance probe findings. Other characteristics include serum eosinophils, neutrophils, and lymphocytes; spirometry; FeNO; and IgE.
Seventy-two patients underwent BAL pepsin testing. Median age was 4.9 years, 30.6% had severe persistent asthma, and 59.2% were on reflux medication. There was an association between positive BAL pepsin assay and positive viral panel (p = .002) or fungal culture (p = .027). No significant association found between positive BAL bacterial culture; BAL cytology; the presence of BAL lipid-laden macrophages; IgE; spirometry; FeNO; CBC neutrophil, eosinophil, or lymphocytes; pH impedance testing parameters; or EGD pathology.
BAL pepsin is associated with a positive BAL viral PCR or fungal culture. Lack of correlation between pepsin-positivity and pH-impedance parameters or EGD pathology suggests microaspiration may be due to an acute event (such as a respiratory infection) rather than chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. This may be especially true in the presence of a positive viral panel or fungal culture when a BAL pepsin is obtained.
评估在慢性咳嗽患儿中,常用的内镜和血清学数据与支气管肺泡灌洗胃蛋白酶测定(BAL)结果之间的关联。
我们对在 18 个月期间通过我们的 Aerodigestive 中心获得 BAL 胃蛋白酶的 72 名儿童进行了回顾性图表审查。BAL 结果包括病毒、细菌或真菌感染的证据、存在含脂巨噬细胞和细胞学(嗜酸性粒细胞、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞)。胃肠道结果包括食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)和 pH 阻抗探头发现。其他特征包括血清嗜酸性粒细胞、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞;肺量测定;FeNO;和 IgE。
72 例患者进行了 BAL 胃蛋白酶检测。中位年龄为 4.9 岁,30.6%患有严重持续性哮喘,59.2%正在服用反流药物。BAL 胃蛋白酶检测阳性与 BAL 病毒检测阳性(p=0.002)或真菌培养阳性(p=0.027)之间存在关联。BAL 细菌培养阳性、BAL 细胞学阳性、BAL 含脂巨噬细胞阳性、IgE、肺量测定、FeNO、CBC 中性粒细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞或淋巴细胞、pH 阻抗检测参数或 EGD 病理之间未发现显著相关性。
BAL 胃蛋白酶与 BAL 病毒 PCR 或真菌培养阳性相关。胃蛋白酶阳性与 pH 阻抗参数或 EGD 病理之间缺乏相关性表明微吸入可能是由急性事件(如呼吸道感染)引起,而不是慢性胃食管反流病。当获得 BAL 胃蛋白酶时,这种情况在存在阳性病毒检测或真菌培养时尤其如此。