Sandner Magdalena, Zeier Peter, Lois Giannis, Wessa Michèle
Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Department of Microeconomics and Public Economics, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jul 16;157:107876. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107876. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
Cognitive emotion regulation is a key mechanism for the maintenance of mental health, but may fail, when individuals are exposed to acute stress. To date, it is not well understood whether and to what extent acute stress effects contribute to impairments in emotion regulation capacities as the sparse existing studies have yielded heterogeneous results, indicating that stress timing might be a crucial factor. In the present study, 81 healthy participants underwent either an acute stress task (ScanSTRESS-C; n = 40) or a control condition (n = 41) while lying in the MRI scanner. In the subsequent Cognitive Emotion Regulation Task (CERT), participants were confronted with neutral or negative pictures and instructed to either view them, or regulate their upcoming emotions using either distraction or reappraisal. Subjective ratings of affective state as well as functional brain imaging data served to indicate emotion regulation. The results showed a successful stress manipulation as indicated by group differences in subjective wellbeing, saliva cortisol concentrations, heart rate, and functional brain activity in regions implicated in stress processing. With respect to emotion regulation, CERT data revealed a significant regulation effect at the neural and behavioral level (less negative emotional ratings after reappraisal and distraction trials compared to view trials) in both groups. However, no significant group differences were observed, neither in BOLD responses to the CERT, nor in behavioral ratings. Contrary to previous studies, our study did not reveal further evidence of stress-related effects on emotion regulation, potentially being related to differences between studies in experimental setting, timing, and procedures. This study therefore underlines the need of future studies that disentangle the complex interplay of stress and emotion regulation and identify different factors influencing their bidirectional relationship.
认知情绪调节是维持心理健康的关键机制,但当个体面临急性应激时可能会失效。迄今为止,由于现有的少量研究结果各异,急性应激效应是否以及在多大程度上导致情绪调节能力受损尚不清楚,这表明应激时机可能是一个关键因素。在本研究中,81名健康参与者躺在MRI扫描仪中时,分别接受急性应激任务(ScanSTRESS-C;n = 40)或对照条件(n = 41)。在随后的认知情绪调节任务(CERT)中,参与者面对中性或负面图片,并被指示要么观看图片,要么使用分心或重新评价来调节即将出现的情绪。情感状态的主观评分以及功能性脑成像数据用于表明情绪调节情况。结果显示应激操作成功,这体现在主观幸福感、唾液皮质醇浓度、心率以及与应激处理相关脑区的功能性脑活动的组间差异上。关于情绪调节,CERT数据显示两组在神经和行为水平上均有显著的调节效应(与观看试验相比,重新评价和分心试验后的负面情绪评分更低)。然而,在对CERT的BOLD反应或行为评分方面均未观察到显著的组间差异。与先前的研究相反,我们的研究没有揭示应激对情绪调节产生相关影响的进一步证据,这可能与研究在实验设置、时机和程序方面的差异有关。因此,本研究强调了未来研究的必要性,即理清应激与情绪调节之间复杂的相互作用,并确定影响它们双向关系的不同因素。