Suppr超能文献

重新评估和分心情绪调节策略与不同的视觉注意模式及不同水平的认知需求相关。

Reappraisal and Distraction Emotion Regulation Strategies Are Associated with Distinct Patterns of Visual Attention and Differing Levels of Cognitive Demand.

作者信息

Strauss Gregory P, Ossenfort Kathryn L, Whearty Kayla M

机构信息

State University of New York at Binghamton, Department of Psychology, Binghamton, NY 13902, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):e0162290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162290. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Multiple emotion regulation strategies have been identified and found to differ in their effectiveness at decreasing negative emotions. One reason for this might be that individual strategies are associated with differing levels of cognitive demand and require distinct patterns of visual attention to achieve their effects. In the current study, we tested this hypothesis in a sample of psychiatrically healthy participants (n = 25) who attempted to down-regulate negative emotion to photographs from the International Affective Picture System using cognitive reappraisal or distraction. Eye movements, pupil dilation, and subjective reports of negative emotionality were obtained for reappraisal, distraction, unpleasant passive viewing, and neutral passive viewing conditions. Behavioral results indicated that reappraisal and distraction successfully decreased self-reported negative affect relative to unpleasant passive viewing. Successful down regulation of negative affect was associated with different patterns of visual attention across regulation strategies. During reappraisal, there was an initial increase in dwell time to arousing scene regions and a subsequent shift away from these regions during later portions of the trial, whereas distraction was associated with reduced total dwell time to arousing interest areas throughout the entire stimulus presentation. Pupil dilation was greater for reappraisal than distraction or unpleasant passive viewing, suggesting that reappraisal may recruit more effortful cognitive control processes. Furthermore, greater decreases in self-reported negative emotion were associated with a lower proportion of dwell time within arousing areas of interest. These findings suggest that different emotion regulation strategies necessitate different patterns of visual attention to be effective and that individual differences in visual attention predict the extent to which individuals can successfully decrease negative emotion using reappraisal and distraction.

摘要

多种情绪调节策略已被识别出来,并且发现它们在减少负面情绪方面的效果有所不同。造成这种情况的一个原因可能是,个体策略与不同水平的认知需求相关联,并且需要不同的视觉注意模式来实现其效果。在当前的研究中,我们在一组精神健康的参与者(n = 25)中检验了这一假设,这些参与者试图使用认知重评或分心的方法来下调对来自国际情感图片系统的照片产生的负面情绪。我们获取了在重评、分心、不愉快被动观看和中性被动观看条件下的眼动、瞳孔扩张以及负面情绪的主观报告。行为结果表明,相对于不愉快被动观看,重评和分心成功地降低了自我报告的负面影响。负面情绪的成功下调与不同调节策略下的不同视觉注意模式相关联。在重评过程中,对引发情绪的场景区域的注视时间最初会增加,而在试验后期会从这些区域转移开,而分心则与在整个刺激呈现过程中对引发兴趣区域的总注视时间减少相关。重评时的瞳孔扩张比分心或不愉快被动观看时更大,这表明重评可能需要更多努力的认知控制过程。此外,自我报告的负面情绪的更大降低与在引发兴趣区域内的注视时间比例较低相关。这些发现表明,不同的情绪调节策略需要不同的视觉注意模式才能有效,并且视觉注意的个体差异预测了个体使用重评和分心成功减少负面情绪的程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e3/5113864/47690a342b2c/pone.0162290.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验