Suppr超能文献

接纳与重新评估:行为、自主神经及神经效应。

Acceptance versus reappraisal: Behavioral, autonomic, and neural effects.

作者信息

Goldin Philippe R, Moodie Craig A, Gross James J

机构信息

University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.

Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):927-944. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00690-7.

Abstract

Emotion regulation (ER) is an important skill for well-being. Cognitive reappraisal is a goal-oriented cognitive change strategy. Acceptance involves decentering from immediate habits of reactivity, observing moment-to-moment shifts in thoughts, emotions, and sensations. These two regulation strategies are thought to have different effects on emotion; however, no study has examined the differential effects of reappraisal and acceptance on behavioral, autonomic, and brain responses in the context of ideographic personally salient negative self-beliefs. Thirty-five right-handed, healthy adults were presented idiographic negative self-beliefs embedded in autobiographical scripts. We measured negative emotion ratings, autonomic psychophysiology, and functional magnetic resonance imaging blood oxygen-level dependent responses while participants read neutral statements, reacted to their own negative self-beliefs, and implemented reappraisal and acceptance strategies. Compared with react, reappraisal resulted in significantly lesser negative emotion and respiration rate; no differences in heart rate and skin conductance level; greater brain responses implicated in cognitive control, language, and social cognition; and lesser amygdala responses. Compared with react, acceptance resulted in significantly lesser negative emotion, respiration rate, and heart rate; no difference in skin conductance level; and greater brain responses in networks implicated in cognitive control and attention. Compared with acceptance, reappraisal resulted in significantly lesser negative emotion; no difference in respiration rate and skin conductance level; higher heart rate; greater brain responses in brain regions implicated in cognitive control; and lesser brain responses in amygdala. Reappraisal is more effective than acceptance in down-regulating negative emotion, but may require greater recruitment of autonomic, cognitive, and brain resources. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02036658.

摘要

情绪调节(ER)是实现幸福的一项重要技能。认知重评是一种以目标为导向的认知改变策略。接纳包括从即时的反应习惯中脱离出来,观察思想、情绪和感觉每时每刻的变化。人们认为这两种调节策略对情绪有不同的影响;然而,尚无研究考察在个性化的突出负面自我信念背景下,重评和接纳对行为、自主神经和大脑反应的差异影响。35名右利手健康成年人被呈现嵌入自传脚本中的个性化负面自我信念。在参与者阅读中性陈述、对自己的负面自我信念做出反应以及实施重评和接纳策略时,我们测量了负面情绪评分、自主神经心理生理学指标以及功能磁共振成像血氧水平依赖反应。与单纯反应相比,重评导致负面情绪和呼吸频率显著降低;心率和皮肤电导率水平无差异;涉及认知控制、语言和社会认知的大脑反应增强;杏仁核反应减弱。与单纯反应相比,接纳导致负面情绪、呼吸频率和心率显著降低;皮肤电导率水平无差异;涉及认知控制和注意力的网络中的大脑反应增强。与接纳相比,重评导致负面情绪显著降低;呼吸频率和皮肤电导率水平无差异;心率更高;涉及认知控制的脑区大脑反应增强;杏仁核脑反应减弱。在下调负面情绪方面,重评比接纳更有效,但可能需要调动更多的自主神经、认知和大脑资源。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02036658。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验