• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建模社交隔离策略以预防 SARS-CoV-2 在以色列的传播:成本效益分析。

Modeling Social Distancing Strategies to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Israel: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine D and The Liver Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel and The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel and The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Value Health. 2021 May;24(5):607-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.013
PMID:33933228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7833124/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

While highly effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 spread, national lockdowns come with an enormous economic price. Few countries have adopted an alternative "testing, tracing, and isolation" approach to selectively isolate people at high exposure risk, thereby minimizing the economic impact. To assist policy makers, we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of these 2 strategies.

METHODS

A modified Susceptible, Exposed, Infectious, Recovered, and Deceased (SEIRD) model was employed to assess the situation in Israel, a small country with ∼9 million people. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of these strategies as well as the expected number of infected individuals and deaths were calculated.

RESULTS

A nationwide lockdown is expected to save, on average, 274 (median 124, interquartile range: 71-221) lives compared to the "testing, tracing, and isolation" approach. However, the ICER will be, on average, $45 104 156 (median $49.6 million, interquartile range: 22.7-220.1) to prevent 1 case of death.

CONCLUSION

A national lockdown has a moderate advantage in saving lives with tremendous costs and possible overwhelming economic effects. These findings should assist decision makers dealing with additional waves of this pandemic.

摘要

目的

尽管在预防 SARS-CoV-2 传播方面非常有效,但全国性封锁会带来巨大的经济代价。很少有国家采用替代的“检测、追踪和隔离”方法,选择性地隔离高暴露风险人群,从而将经济影响降到最低。为了协助决策者,我们对这两种策略进行了成本效益分析。

方法

采用改良的易感者-暴露者-感染者-恢复者-死亡者(SEIRD)模型评估以色列的情况,该国是一个拥有约 900 万人口的小国。计算了这两种策略的增量成本效益比(ICER)以及预期感染人数和死亡人数。

结果

与“检测、追踪和隔离”方法相比,全国性封锁预计平均可挽救 274 人(中位数为 124 人,四分位距:71-221)的生命。然而,为预防 1 例死亡,ICER 平均将达到 45104156 美元(中位数为 4960 万美元,四分位距:22.7-220.1)。

结论

全国性封锁在挽救生命方面具有适度优势,但代价巨大,可能产生压倒性的经济影响。这些发现应有助于决策者应对这一流行病的后续浪潮。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d6/7833124/0fe1e4d136d2/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d6/7833124/376c24c210aa/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d6/7833124/191767ce58fc/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d6/7833124/36ef788cbec6/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d6/7833124/491a35bd8d18/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d6/7833124/0fe1e4d136d2/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d6/7833124/376c24c210aa/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d6/7833124/191767ce58fc/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d6/7833124/36ef788cbec6/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d6/7833124/491a35bd8d18/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d6/7833124/0fe1e4d136d2/gr5_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling Social Distancing Strategies to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Israel: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.建模社交隔离策略以预防 SARS-CoV-2 在以色列的传播:成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2021 May;24(5):607-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
2
Notes on cost benefit of COVID-19 lockdown.关于新冠疫情封锁措施成本效益的笔记
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jul;21(7):4-6. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12970. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
3
Lessons from Contact Tracing in Mid-Missouri.密苏里州中部的接触者追踪经验教训。
Mo Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;118(1):81-84.
4
Dynamic modelling to identify mitigation strategies for the COVID-19 pandemic.用于识别 COVID-19 大流行缓解策略的动态建模。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 May 4;151:w20487. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.20487. eCollection 2021 Apr 26.
5
The cost-effectiveness of social distancing measures for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic in a highly-populated country: A case study in Indonesia.人口众多的国家实施社交隔离措施缓解 COVID-19 大流行的成本效益:印度尼西亚的案例研究。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2022 Jan-Feb;45:102245. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102245. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
Effect of national and local lockdowns on the control of COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.国家和地方封锁措施对 COVID-19 大流行控制的影响:快速综述。
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):60-68. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.104.
7
COVID-19 healthcare demand and mortality in Sweden in response to non-pharmaceutical mitigation and suppression scenarios.瑞典针对非药物缓解和抑制情景的 COVID-19 医疗需求和死亡率。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 1;49(5):1443-1453. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa121.
8
Why did the world's pandemic warning system fail when COVID hit?当新冠疫情来袭时,全球大流行预警系统为何失灵?
Nature. 2021 Jan;589(7843):499-500. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00162-4.
9
Adaptive Policies to Balance Health Benefits and Economic Costs of Physical Distancing Interventions during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间,平衡物理隔离干预措施的健康效益和经济成本的适应性政策。
Med Decis Making. 2021 May;41(4):386-392. doi: 10.1177/0272989X21990371. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
10
Motivations for Social Distancing and App Use as Complementary Measures to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: Quantitative Survey Study.将社交距离和应用程序使用作为对抗新冠疫情补充措施的动机:定量调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 27;22(8):e21613. doi: 10.2196/21613.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of economic evaluation in modelling public health and social measures for pandemic policy: a systematic review.经济评估在为大流行政策制定公共卫生和社会措施模型中的作用:一项系统综述。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Nov 1;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00585-6.
2
Cost of the COVID-19 pandemic versus the cost-effectiveness of mitigation strategies in EU/UK/OECD: a systematic review.COVID-19 大流行的成本与欧盟/英国/经合组织缓解策略的成本效益:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 31;13(10):e077602. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077602.
3
COVID-19 Pandemic: Did Strict Mobility Restrictions Save Lives and Healthcare Costs in Maharashtra, India?

本文引用的文献

1
Economic and social consequences of human mobility restrictions under COVID-19.COVID-19 下人员流动限制的经济和社会后果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 7;117(27):15530-15535. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007658117. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
2
Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the Icelandic Population.SARS-CoV-2 在冰岛人群中的传播。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2302-2315. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2006100. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
3
Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding.
新冠疫情:印度马哈拉施特拉邦实施的严格出行限制措施是否挽救了生命并降低了医疗成本?
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 24;11(14):2112. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142112.
4
Economic evaluation of strategies against coronavirus: a systematic review.针对冠状病毒的策略的经济评估:一项系统综述。
Health Econ Rev. 2023 Mar 18;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00430-1.
5
Reducing the basic reproduction number of COVID-19: a model simulation focused on QALYs, hospitalisation, productivity costs and optimal (soft) lockdown.降低 COVID-19 的基本再生数:一项基于 QALYs、住院、生产力成本和最佳(软性)封锁的模型模拟。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Jun;24(4):647-659. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01500-7. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
6
Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions.健康经济学研究是否与中东和北非地区的疾病负担一致?公共卫生干预措施的经济评估研究的系统评价。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2022 Jul 25;7(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00258-y.
7
Economic evaluations of interventions against viral pandemics: a scoping review.干预病毒性大流行的经济评估:范围综述。
Public Health. 2022 Jul;208:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
Cost-effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and control of COVID-19: Systematic review of 85 modelling studies.预防和控制 COVID-19 的干预措施的成本效益:85 项建模研究的系统评价。
J Glob Health. 2022 Jun 15;12:05022. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05022.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of COVID-19 Policy Measures: A Systematic Review.COVID-19 政策措施的成本效益:系统评价。
Value Health. 2021 Nov;24(11):1551-1569. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
10
Health Economics of Interventions to Tackle the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic.应对2019年冠状病毒大流行干预措施的卫生经济学
Value Health. 2021 May;24(5):605-606. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
儿童感染 SARS-CoV-2 的特征及粪便中持续存在病毒的潜在证据。
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):502-505. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0817-4. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
If the world fails to protect the economy, COVID-19 will damage health not just now but also in the future.如果全球未能保护好经济,新冠疫情不仅会在当下损害健康,还会在未来造成危害。
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):640-642. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0863-y.
5
Case-Fatality Rate and Characteristics of Patients Dying in Relation to COVID-19 in Italy.意大利新冠肺炎死亡患者的病死率及特征
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1775-1776. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4683.
6
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.新冠疫情期间稀缺医疗资源的公平分配
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
7
COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic.2019冠状病毒病:迈向大流行的控制
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1015-1018. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30673-5. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
8
Countries test tactics in 'war' against COVID-19.各国在抗击新冠疫情的“战争”中试验策略。
Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):1287-1288. doi: 10.1126/science.367.6484.1287.
9
The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的潜伏期来自公开报告的确诊病例:估计和应用。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 5;172(9):577-582. doi: 10.7326/M20-0504. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
10
Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.《中国 2019 年冠状病毒病临床特征》
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. Epub 2020 Feb 28.