Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Value Health. 2021 May;24(5):691-698. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.015. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
In January 2009, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence introduced supplementary guidance for end-of-life (EoL) treatments, which allowed treatments with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio over the regular threshold (£20 000-£30 000) to be recommended, if they satisfied the EoL criteria. The aims of this study were (1) to systematically review 10 years of EoL supplementary guidance implementation and explore how it could be improved, and (2) to create a framework for incorporating the uncertainty relating to EoL criteria satisfaction into model-based cost-effectiveness analyses for decision making.
All appraisals between January 2009 and 2019 were screened for EoL discussions. Data were extracted on the EoL criteria and cost-effectiveness assessment details. Additionally, a quantitative method was developed to include the EoL criteria satisfaction uncertainty into model-based cost-effectiveness analyses. A stylized example was created to provide a case study for the inclusion of EoL criteria satisfaction uncertainty.
An EoL discussion was identified in 35% of appraisals, 57% of which led to a positive EoL decision. Only 5.7% of technologies with positive EoL decisions were not recommended, versus 43.8% of technologies with negative EoL decisions. EoL criteria assessment was often reported insufficiently and evaluated inconsistently and nontransparently. A total of 54.9% of EoL decisions were made while at least 1 criterion was surrounded by considerable uncertainty. By applying the proposed quantitative method, this EoL criteria satisfaction uncertainty was accounted for in decision making. The stylized example demonstrated that the impact of EoL criteria satisfaction uncertainty can be substantial enough to reverse the reimbursement decision.
To improve consistency/transparency and correct reimbursement decisions' likelihood, new guidelines on the implementation of the EoL criteria are needed.
2009 年 1 月,英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(National Institute for Health and Care Excellence)发布了临终治疗补充指南,允许在符合临终标准的情况下,推荐增量成本效益比超过常规阈值(20000 至 30000 英镑)的治疗方法。本研究的目的是:(1)系统回顾 10 年来临终补充指南的实施情况,并探讨如何改进该指南;(2)建立一个框架,将与临终标准满足相关的不确定性纳入基于模型的成本效益分析,以用于决策。
筛选了 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年期间所有的评估报告,以寻找临终讨论内容。提取了有关临终标准和成本效益评估细节的数据。此外,还开发了一种定量方法,将临终标准满足的不确定性纳入基于模型的成本效益分析中。创建了一个简化示例,为纳入临终标准满足的不确定性提供了案例研究。
35%的评估报告中识别出了临终讨论,其中 57%的评估报告做出了积极的临终决策。仅有 5.7%的具有积极临终决策的技术未被推荐,而 43.8%的具有消极临终决策的技术被推荐。临终标准评估报告往往报告得不够充分,评估结果不一致且不透明。在至少有一个标准存在较大不确定性的情况下,做出了 54.9%的临终决策。通过应用建议的定量方法,考虑了临终标准满足的不确定性对决策的影响。简化示例表明,临终标准满足的不确定性的影响可能足以改变报销决策。
需要制定新的临终标准实施指南,以提高一致性/透明度和纠正报销决策的可能性。