Saygın Avşar Tuba, Jackson Louise, Barton Pelham, Beese Sophie, Chidubem Okeke Ogwulu, Lim Sern, Quinn David, Price Malcolm J, Moore David J
Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 May;9(3):351-363. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00564-4. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) can extend life and improve quality of life among advanced heart failure patients ineligible for transplantation (destination therapy). High-quality evidence on the cost effectiveness of LVADs compared with optimal medical management is needed to inform policy. This study identifies economic evaluations of LVADs for destination therapy and assesses their methodological quality.
The review followed Centre for Review and Dissemination guidelines for methods, and PRISMA standards for reporting, and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020158987). Six databases were searched for studies published up to October 2024. Full economic evaluations of LVADs for destination therapy were included. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction and quality assessment using validated tools.
The study identified 14 economic evaluations, including 10 modelling studies. Most studies were from the US and UK. There was substantial variation in model structure, methods, and cost estimates. Only seven studies used a lifetime horizon. Resource use was typically estimated based on data from small single-centre samples. Overall quality was moderate due to key limitations such as insufficient time horizons, omitting complications and costs, and limited consideration of uncertainty. Only two studies examined severity, and none assessed cost effectiveness by patient age. Most studies found LVADs not to be cost effective compared with medical management except for two UK-based evaluations.
This review reveals important limitations in the current evidence on the cost effectiveness of LVADs as destination therapy. More comprehensive, robust evaluations are needed to inform policy decisions.
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)可延长无法接受移植(目标治疗)的晚期心力衰竭患者的生命并改善其生活质量。需要高质量的证据来证明LVAD与最佳药物治疗相比的成本效益,以为政策制定提供依据。本研究确定了LVAD用于目标治疗的经济评估,并评估了其方法学质量。
该综述遵循了循证医学中心的方法指南和系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)标准,并在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42020158987)上进行了注册。检索了六个数据库,以查找截至2024年10月发表的研究。纳入了LVAD用于目标治疗的全面经济评估。两名评审员使用经过验证的工具独立进行研究选择、数据提取和质量评估。
该研究确定了14项经济评估,包括10项模型研究。大多数研究来自美国和英国。模型结构、方法和成本估计存在很大差异。只有七项研究采用了终身视角。资源使用通常基于来自小型单中心样本的数据进行估计。由于关键限制,如时间范围不足、遗漏并发症和成本以及对不确定性的考虑有限,总体质量中等。只有两项研究考察了疾病严重程度,没有一项研究按患者年龄评估成本效益。除了两项英国的评估外,大多数研究发现与药物治疗相比,LVAD不具有成本效益。
本综述揭示了目前LVAD作为目标治疗的成本效益证据存在的重要局限性。需要更全面、更有力的评估来为政策决策提供依据。