Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, 169857, Singapore.
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Rd, 229899, Singapore.
Clin Nutr. 2021 May;40(5):2772-2783. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The association between nutritional status at pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission with clinical outcomes remains unclear. We conducted this systematic review to summarize the overall impact of PICU admission body mass index (BMI) on clinical outcomes.
We searched the following medical databases from inception through May 2020: PubMed, Excerpta Medica database (Embase), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We included studies on patients ≤18 years old admitted to a PICU that investigated the effect of BMI on mortality, PICU or hospital length of stay (LOS), or duration of mechanical ventilation (MV). Classification of underweight, overweight, and obese were based on each study's criteria.
There was a total of 21,558 patients from 20 included studies. 12,936 (60.0%), 2965 (13.8%), 2182 (10.1%), 3348 (15.5%) were normal weight, underweight, overweight, and obese patients, respectively. Relative to normal weight patients, underweight (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.89-1.98; p = 0.171) and overweight/obese patients (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86-1.42; p = 0.446) did not have an increase risk in mortality. There was also no difference in duration of MV, PICU and hospital LOS between all three weight categories. Included studies were heterogeneous and lacked standardized nutritional categorization. Sensitivity analysis including only studies that used BMI z-scores as nutritional classification (n = 5) revealed that underweight patients had higher odds of mortality compared to patients with normal weight (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.35-1.92; p < 0.001); studies that used percentiles as classification did not reveal any differences in mortality. Sensitivity analysis including only studies containing mixed PICU cohorts (i.e., excluding specialized cohorts e.g., congenital heart surgeries, burns) revealed higher mortality odds in underweight patients (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.25-1.87; p < 0.001) and overweight/obese patients (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.14-2.01; p = 0.004) relative to normal weight patients.
Our systematic review did not reveal any association between PICU admission BMI status and outcomes in critically ill children. Further investigation with standardized nutrition status classification on admission, stratified by patient subgroups, is needed to clarify the association between nutritional status and clinical outcomes of PICU patients.
儿科重症监护病房(PICU)入院时的营养状况与临床结局之间的关系尚不清楚。我们进行了这项系统评价,以总结 PICU 入院时体重指数(BMI)对临床结局的总体影响。
我们从成立到 2020 年 5 月检索了以下医学数据库:PubMed、医学文摘数据库(Embase)、护理与联合健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、 Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science。我们纳入了研究患者≤18 岁,入住 PICU,调查 BMI 对死亡率、PICU 或住院时间(LOS)或机械通气(MV)持续时间影响的研究。消瘦、超重和肥胖的分类基于每个研究的标准。
共有来自 20 项研究的 21558 名患者。12936 名(60.0%)、2965 名(13.8%)、2182 名(10.1%)、3348 名(15.5%)分别为正常体重、消瘦、超重和肥胖患者。与正常体重患者相比,消瘦(OR 1.32,95%CI 0.89-1.98;p=0.171)和超重/肥胖患者(OR 1.10,95%CI 0.86-1.42;p=0.446)的死亡率无升高风险。所有三个体重类别之间的 MV 持续时间、PICU 和住院 LOS 也没有差异。纳入的研究具有异质性,缺乏标准化的营养分类。包括仅使用 BMI z 评分作为营养分类的研究(n=5)的敏感性分析显示,与正常体重患者相比,消瘦患者的死亡率更高(OR 1.61,95%CI 1.35-1.92;p<0.001);使用百分位数进行分类的研究并未显示死亡率存在差异。包括仅包含混合 PICU 队列(即排除专门队列,如先天性心脏病手术、烧伤)的研究的敏感性分析显示,消瘦患者(OR 1.53,95%CI 1.25-1.87;p<0.001)和超重/肥胖患者(OR 1.51,95%CI 1.14-2.01;p=0.004)的死亡率较高体重患者。
我们的系统评价并未显示 PICU 入院 BMI 状况与危重症儿童的结局之间存在任何关联。需要进一步进行研究,对入院时的营养状况进行标准化分类,并按患者亚组分层,以阐明营养状况与 PICU 患者临床结局之间的关系。