Kinsman Leigh, Cooper Simon, Champion Robert, Kim Jeong-Ah, Boyle Jayne, Cameron Amanda, Cant Robyn P, Chung Catherine, Connell Cliff, Evans Lisa, McInnes Denise, McKay Angela, Norman Lisa, Penz Erika, Rana Masud, Rotter Thomas
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Port Macquarie Base Hospital, Port Macquarie, NSW 2444, Australia.
Federation University Australia, Northways Rd., Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jul;102:104939. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104939. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
Nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute hospital wards is a priority issue. Simulation education programs improve nurses' knowledge and confidence, but the translation into better care is largely unknown for both web based (WB) and face to face (F2F) simulation programs.
To measure the impact of simulation education on nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute medical ward settings, and to compare the impact of WB and F2F versions.
An interrupted time series, non-randomised trial across four medical wards in Victoria, Australia. Wards were allocated to either web-based or face-to-face versions of the same simulation program, FIRST2ACT. Interrupted time series measurement for six fortnights both before and after the intervention were used to measure and compare responses to deterioration. Responses to patient deterioration were extracted from medical records and grouped into outcomes for escalation (e.g. initiation of clinical review), assessment and observation (e.g. increased recording of vital signs, conscious state and pain scores) and clinical interventions (e.g. oxygen administration).
126 nurses (89%) participated across the four wards. 946 patient records (506 in the F2F; 440 in the WB group) were included in analyses. There were significant and sustained improvements between pre and post samples in outcomes for escalation (13.0% to 28.8%; p = 0.000) and assessment and observation (conscious state recorded increased from 91.1% to 100%; p = 0.000, and pain score recorded increased from 97.8% to 99.8%; p = 0.000). There were no differences between the web-based and face-to-face groups except in appropriate oxygen application which increased by 7.7% in the F2F group and decreased by 11.8% in the WB group (p = 0.046).
There was a significant improvement in nurses' response to patient deterioration following both versions of simulation, indicating that both have a role to play in supporting nurses' response to patient deterioration.
在急性医院病房中,护士对患者病情恶化的应对是一个优先问题。模拟教育项目能提高护士的知识水平和信心,但对于基于网络(WB)和面对面(F2F)的模拟项目而言,它们在转化为更好的护理方面的情况很大程度上尚不明确。
评估模拟教育对急性内科病房护士应对患者病情恶化的影响,并比较基于网络和面对面两种版本的影响。
在澳大利亚维多利亚州的四个内科病房进行的一项中断时间序列、非随机试验。病房被分配到同一模拟项目FIRST2ACT的基于网络或面对面版本。在干预前后各进行六个双周的中断时间序列测量,以测量和比较对病情恶化的应对情况。从医疗记录中提取对患者病情恶化的应对情况,并将其分组为升级(如启动临床评估)、评估和观察(如增加生命体征、意识状态和疼痛评分的记录)以及临床干预(如给予氧气)等结果。
四个病房共有126名护士(89%)参与。分析纳入了946份患者记录(面对面组506份;基于网络组440份)。在升级结果方面(从13.0%提高到28.8%;p = 0.000)以及评估和观察方面(意识状态记录从91.1%提高到100%;p = 0.000,疼痛评分记录从97.8%提高到99.8%;p = 0.000),样本前后有显著且持续的改善。基于网络组和面对面组之间没有差异,除了在适当使用氧气方面,面对面组增加了7.7%,基于网络组减少了11.8%(p = 0.046)。
两种版本的模拟后,护士对患者病情恶化的应对都有显著改善,表明两者在支持护士对患者病情恶化的应对方面都发挥了作用。