• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工假体重建治疗股骨近端转移病理性骨折的假体生存率和功能结果。

Implant survival and functional results of endoprosthetic reconstruction for proximal femoral metastases with pathological fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Tuzla State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Hip Int. 2022 Mar;32(2):174-184. doi: 10.1177/11207000211014813. Epub 2021 May 2.

DOI:10.1177/11207000211014813
PMID:33934620
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the patient and implant survival, clinical and functional outcomes, and the rate of complications resulting in reconstruction failure following endoprosthetic reconstruction (EPR) of extensive proximal femoral metastases associated with actual or impending pathological fractures.

METHODS

A total of 111 patients with actual or impending pathological fractures due to metastatic disease of the proximal femur were treated with EPR between 2003 and 2018. Staged surgery, bilateral EPR, was performed in 3 cases. The patients comprised 51 females and 60 males with a mean age of 52.1 ± 12.3 years. The patient and implant survival were recorded. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed by using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) functional scoring, and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). The different types of abductor mechanism repair were evaluated by functional tests and existence of Trendelenburg gait at postoperative follow-ups. The complications resulting in reconstruction failure were investigated.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 23.1 ± 17.9 months. The overall survival of patients after EPR was 89% at 6 months, 72% at 1 year and 10% at 5 years. The estimated 1- and 5-year overall implant survival was 100% and 97.3% (95% CI, 0.95-0.98), respectively, as the endpoint was defined as complete removal of the prosthesis. Median VAS score before endoprosthetic replacement was 8 and after 3 months 4. Before surgery, the median MSTS score was 40 (30-56.6%) and the median KPS score was 40 (30-50). Postoperative third month, the median MSTS score was 56.6 (53.3-86.6%) and the median KPS score was 60 (40-70). Functional scores were superior in trochanter major split osteotomized group compared to trochanter major removed group. Trendelenburg gait was seen in 20 (17.5%) patients postoperatively. There were 10 (8.7%) complications resulting in reconstruction failure.

CONCLUSION

Endoprosthetic replacement can provide a durable fixation with high implant survival rate and good clinical and functional results in extensive proximal femoral metastases associated with a pathological fracture.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估广泛累及股骨近端转移瘤伴实际或即将发生病理性骨折患者行人工假体重建(EPR)后的患者和假体生存率、临床和功能结果以及导致重建失败的并发症发生率。

方法

2003 年至 2018 年间,111 例股骨近端转移瘤伴实际或即将发生病理性骨折的患者接受了 EPR 治疗。3 例患者接受了分期手术和双侧 EPR。患者包括 51 名女性和 60 名男性,平均年龄为 52.1±12.3 岁。记录患者和假体的生存率。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会(MSTS)功能评分和卡诺夫斯基功能状态评分(KPS)评估临床和功能结果。通过术后随访时的功能试验和存在的 Trendelenburg 步态来评估不同类型的外展肌机制修复情况。研究了导致重建失败的并发症。

结果

平均随访时间为 23.1±17.9 个月。EPR 后患者的总体生存率为术后 6 个月 89%、1 年 72%和 5 年 10%。预计 1 年和 5 年的总体假体生存率分别为 100%和 97.3%(95%CI:0.95-0.98),此时终点定义为假体完全取出。人工假体置换前的 VAS 评分中位数为 8,3 个月后为 4。术前 MSTS 评分中位数为 40(30-56.6%),KPS 评分中位数为 40(30-50)。术后 3 个月,MSTS 评分中位数为 56.6(53.3-86.6%),KPS 评分中位数为 60(40-70)。转子间大劈开组的功能评分优于转子间切除组。术后有 20 例(17.5%)患者出现 Trendelenburg 步态。有 10 例(8.7%)患者发生导致重建失败的并发症。

结论

在广泛累及股骨近端伴病理性骨折的转移瘤患者中,人工假体置换可提供牢固的固定,具有较高的假体生存率和良好的临床及功能效果。

相似文献

1
Implant survival and functional results of endoprosthetic reconstruction for proximal femoral metastases with pathological fractures.人工假体重建治疗股骨近端转移病理性骨折的假体生存率和功能结果。
Hip Int. 2022 Mar;32(2):174-184. doi: 10.1177/11207000211014813. Epub 2021 May 2.
2
What Are the Functional Results and Complications With Long Stem Hemiarthroplasty in Patients With Metastases to the Proximal Femur?股骨近端转移瘤患者行长柄半髋关节置换术的功能结果及并发症有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):745-756. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4810-7.
3
Treatment of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur.股骨近端病理性骨折的治疗。
Injury. 2018 Nov;49 Suppl 3:S77-S83. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.044.
4
Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur.股骨近端肿瘤的模块化人工关节置换术。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Jan;91(1):108-12. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.20448.
5
Oncological and functional results after surgical treatment of bone metastases at the proximal femur.股骨近端骨转移瘤手术治疗后的肿瘤学及功能结果。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0336-0.
6
Interlocking reconstruction-mode stem-sideplates preserve at-risk hips with short residual proximal femora.交错重建模式柄侧钢板可保留存在风险的髋关节,适用于股骨近端短缩的患者。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Feb;103-B(2):398-404. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0654.R1.
7
Is osseous reattachment of the greater trochanter necessary compared to soft-tissue-only abductor repair in proximal femoral megaprosthesis reconstruction?在股骨近端大假体重建中,与仅进行软组织外展肌修复相比,大转子的骨性重新附着是否必要?
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;124(1):115-123. doi: 10.1002/jso.26477. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
8
Endoprostheses last longer than intramedullary devices in proximal femur metastases.在股骨近端转移瘤中,假体的使用寿命长于髓内装置。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Mar;470(3):684-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2038-0.
9
Outcomes of Endoprosthetic Replacement for Salvage of Failed Fixation of Malignant Pathologic Proximal Femur Fractures.人工假体置换治疗恶性病理股骨近端骨折内固定失败的疗效。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Apr;34(4):700-703. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.009. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
10
Is a Cephalomedullary Nail Durable Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Peritrochanteric Disease?经股骨转子间骨折内固定治疗转移性股骨转子周围疾病的效果是否持久?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Dec;476(12):2392-2401. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000523.

引用本文的文献

1
Implant survival and risk factors for failure after proximal femoral megaprosthetic reconstruction.股骨近端大型假体重建术后的植入物存活率及失败风险因素
SICOT J. 2025;11:50. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2025031. Epub 2025 Aug 26.
2
Soft tissue reconstruction using Trevira tube following proximal femur resection and tumorous endoprosthetic replacement.股骨近端切除及肿瘤型人工关节置换术后使用特瑞维拉管进行软组织重建。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 25;26(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08948-7.
3
Ultra-short stem intercalary prosthetic reconstruction for joint preservation in metaphyseal tumor management: a retrospective review of twenty-five cases.
超短柄节段性假体重建在干骺端肿瘤保关节治疗中的应用:25例回顾性分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 24;26(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08780-z.
4
Surgical management of metastatic lesions in the proximal femur: a systematic review.股骨近端转移瘤的外科治疗:一项系统评价
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Feb 3;10(2):104-114. doi: 10.1530/EOR-24-0138. Print 2025 Feb 1.
5
Risk of complications and implant survival of surgical treatment of proximal femoral metastasis: a meta-analysis.股骨近端转移瘤的手术治疗并发症风险和种植体存活率:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 May;34(4):1779-1794. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03930-w. Epub 2024 Apr 5.