IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(6):915-923. doi: 10.3233/BMR-200348.
Activity monitors have been introduced in the last years to objectively measure physical activity to help physicians in the management of musculoskeletal patients.
This systematic review aimed at describing the assessment of physical activity by commercially available portable activity monitors in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.
PubMed, Embase, PEDro, Web of Science, Scopus and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception to June 11th, 2020. We considered as eligible observational studies with: musculoskeletal patients; physical activity measured by wearable sensors based on inertial measurement units; comparisons performed with other tools; outcomes consisting of number of steps/day, activity/inactivity time, or activity counts/day.
Out of 595 records, after removing duplicates, title/abstract and full text screening, 10 articles were included. We noticed a wide heterogeneity in the wearable devices, that resulted to be 10 different types. Patients included suffered from rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and fibromyalgia. Only 3 studies compared portable activity trackers with objective measurement tools.
Taken together, this systematic review showed that activity monitors might be considered as useful to assess physical activity in patients with musculoskeletal disorders, albeit, to date, the high device heterogeneity and the different algorithms still prevent their standardization.
近年来,活动监测器被引入,以客观地测量身体活动,帮助医生管理肌肉骨骼患者。
本系统评价旨在描述商业上可用的便携式活动监测器在肌肉骨骼疾病患者中评估身体活动的情况。
从建库至 2020 年 6 月 11 日,系统地检索了 PubMed、Embase、PEDro、Web of Science、Scopus 和 CENTRAL 数据库。我们考虑了符合以下条件的观察性研究:肌肉骨骼患者;使用基于惯性测量单元的可穿戴传感器测量的身体活动;与其他工具进行了比较;结果包括每天的步数/天、活动/不活动时间或每天的活动计数。
在排除重复项、标题/摘要和全文筛选后,从 595 条记录中,有 10 篇文章被纳入。我们注意到可穿戴设备存在很大的异质性,结果发现有 10 种不同的类型。纳入的患者患有类风湿关节炎、骨关节炎、青少年特发性关节炎、巨细胞性多关节炎和纤维肌痛。只有 3 项研究将便携式活动追踪器与客观测量工具进行了比较。
总的来说,本系统评价表明,活动监测器可被视为评估肌肉骨骼疾病患者身体活动的有用工具,尽管目前设备的高度异质性和不同的算法仍然妨碍了它们的标准化。