Chahal Simran, Biln Norma, Clarke Bruce
Augurex Life Sciences Corp., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
B2 Consulting, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Open Access Rheumatol. 2021 Apr 23;13:63-71. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S296541. eCollection 2021.
Emerging evidence suggests that patients are increasingly willing to use digital mobile health applications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA apps). The development and diffusion of RA apps open the possibility of improved management of the disease and better physician-patient interactions. However, adoption rates among apps have been lower than hoped, and research shows that many available RA apps lack key features. There is little research exploring patient preferences for RA apps or patients' habits and preferences for app payment, which are likely key factors affecting adoption of this technology. This study seeks to understand characteristics of RA patients who have adopted RA apps, their preferences for app features, and their willingness to pay for, and experiences with app payment.
Data for this study come from a 33-question online survey of patients with RA in Canada and the United States (N=30). Information on demographics, diagnosis and management of RA, current use and desired features of RA apps, and prior experience with and willingness to pay for an app was collected. Descriptive statistics are reported, and bivariate analyses (chi-square, point-biserial correlation, and ANOVA) were performed to understand relationships between variables.
Respondents showed a clear preference for certain app features, namely symptom tracking, scheduling appointments, and reminders. Physician recommendation for an app and patient tracking of symptoms with an app were significantly related to patient adoption of an RA app. Years since diagnosis with RA, physician recommendation for an RA app, and current use of a non-RA health tracking app were significantly related to patients' willingness to pay a subscription for an RA app.
RA patients appear to prefer task support features in an RA app, notably symptom tracking, appointment scheduling, and reminders, over other features such as those related to dialogue support and social support. The choice of whether an RA app will be free or based on a subscription, pay-per-service, or one-time purchase model may also play a role in eventual adoption. Similarly, physician recommendation appears to influence patients' decision to use an RA app as well as their willingness to pay a subscription for an app.
新出现的证据表明,患者越来越愿意使用数字移动健康应用程序来管理类风湿性关节炎(类风湿关节炎应用程序)。类风湿关节炎应用程序的开发和传播为改善疾病管理以及加强医患互动带来了可能性。然而,应用程序的采用率低于预期,并且研究表明,许多现有的类风湿关节炎应用程序缺乏关键功能。很少有研究探讨患者对类风湿关节炎应用程序的偏好,或者患者对应用程序付费的习惯和偏好,而这些可能是影响这项技术采用的关键因素。本研究旨在了解已采用类风湿关节炎应用程序的类风湿关节炎患者的特征、他们对应用程序功能的偏好,以及他们为应用程序付费的意愿和付费体验。
本研究的数据来自对加拿大和美国的类风湿关节炎患者进行的一项包含33个问题的在线调查(N = 30)。收集了有关人口统计学、类风湿关节炎的诊断和管理、类风湿关节炎应用程序的当前使用情况和期望功能,以及应用程序的既往使用经验和付费意愿的信息。报告了描述性统计数据,并进行了双变量分析(卡方检验、点二列相关分析和方差分析)以了解变量之间的关系。
受访者对某些应用程序功能表现出明显偏好,即症状跟踪、预约安排和提醒。医生对应用程序的推荐以及患者使用应用程序跟踪症状与患者采用类风湿关节炎应用程序显著相关。自诊断为类风湿关节炎以来的年限、医生对类风湿关节炎应用程序的推荐,以及当前使用非类风湿关节炎健康跟踪应用程序与患者为类风湿关节炎应用程序支付订阅费用的意愿显著相关。
与对话支持和社会支持等其他功能相比,类风湿关节炎患者似乎更喜欢类风湿关节炎应用程序中的任务支持功能,尤其是症状跟踪、预约安排和提醒。类风湿关节炎应用程序是免费的还是基于订阅、按服务付费或一次性购买模式,这一选择可能也会对最终采用产生影响。同样,医生的推荐似乎会影响患者使用类风湿关节炎应用程序的决定以及他们为应用程序支付订阅费用的意愿。