• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pressure Ulcer Injury in Unstructured Clinical Notes: Detection and Interpretation.非结构化临床记录中的压疮损伤:检测与解读。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:1160-1169. eCollection 2020.
2
Evaluating Natural Language Processing Packages for Predicting Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries From Clinical Notes.评估自然语言处理软件包在预测临床记录中的医院获得性压力性损伤方面的作用。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2024 Mar 1;42(3):184-192. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001053.
3
Automated Pressure Injury Risk Assessment System Incorporated Into an Electronic Health Record System.集成到电子健康记录系统中的自动压力性损伤风险评估系统
Nurs Res. 2017 Nov/Dec;66(6):462-472. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000245.
4
The Value of Unstructured Electronic Health Record Data in Geriatric Syndrome Case Identification.非结构化电子健康记录数据在老年综合征病例识别中的价值。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1499-1507. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15411. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
5
Predicting Mortality in Critical Care Patients with Fungemia Using Structured and Unstructured Data.利用结构化和非结构化数据预测真菌血症重症监护患者的死亡率
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020 Jul;2020:5459-5463. doi: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175287.
6
Combining structured and unstructured data for predictive models: a deep learning approach.将结构化和非结构化数据结合用于预测模型:一种深度学习方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 29;20(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01297-6.
7
Predictive models for pressure ulcers from intensive care unit electronic health records using Bayesian networks.基于贝叶斯网络的重症监护病房电子健康记录中压疮预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jul 5;17(Suppl 2):65. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0471-z.
8
A customizable deep learning model for nosocomial risk prediction from critical care notes with indirect supervision.一种可定制的深度学习模型,用于通过间接监督从重症监护记录中预测医院获得性风险。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Apr 1;27(4):567-576. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa004.
9
Automated Surgical Term Clustering: A Text Mining Approach for Unstructured Textual Surgery Descriptions.自动手术术语聚类:一种用于非结构化手术描述的文本挖掘方法。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Jul;24(7):2107-2118. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2956973. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
10
Automatic generation of case-detection algorithms to identify children with asthma from large electronic health record databases.从大型电子健康记录数据库中自动生成病例检测算法以识别哮喘儿童。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Aug;22(8):826-33. doi: 10.1002/pds.3438. Epub 2013 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence Methods for Diagnostic and Decision-Making Assistance in Chronic Wounds: A Systematic Review.慢性伤口诊断与决策辅助的人工智能方法:一项系统综述
J Med Syst. 2025 Feb 19;49(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02153-8.
2
Developing an Inpatient Electronic Medical Record Phenotype for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries: Case Study Using Natural Language Processing Models.开发用于医院获得性压力性损伤的住院电子病历表型:使用自然语言处理模型的案例研究
JMIR AI. 2023 Mar 8;2:e41264. doi: 10.2196/41264.
3
Implementable Prediction of Pressure Injuries in Hospitalized Adults: Model Development and Validation.住院成人压力性损伤的可实施预测:模型开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 May 8;12:e51842. doi: 10.2196/51842.
4
An AdaBoost-based algorithm to detect hospital-acquired pressure injury in the presence of conflicting annotations.一种基于 AdaBoost 的算法,用于在存在冲突注释的情况下检测医院获得性压力性损伤。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Jan;168:107754. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107754. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
Evaluating Natural Language Processing Packages for Predicting Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries From Clinical Notes.评估自然语言处理软件包在预测临床记录中的医院获得性压力性损伤方面的作用。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2024 Mar 1;42(3):184-192. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001053.
6
A Comprehensive and Improved Definition for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury Classification Based on Electronic Health Records: Comparative Study.基于电子健康记录的医院获得性压力性损伤分类的全面改进定义:比较研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Feb 23;11:e40672. doi: 10.2196/40672.
7
A systematic review of predictive models for hospital-acquired pressure injury using machine learning.基于机器学习的医院获得性压疮预测模型的系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2023 Mar;10(3):1234-1246. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1429. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
8
Examining the Concordance in the Documented Pressure Injury Site, Stage, and Count in Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III.在重症监护医疗信息集市-III 中检查文档化压力性损伤部位、分期和计数的一致性。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):897-909. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735179. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting the Incidence of Pressure Ulcers in the Intensive Care Unit Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习预测重症监护病房中压疮的发生率。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Sep 5;7(1):49. doi: 10.5334/egems.307.
2
Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.预防压疮的风险评估工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD006471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006471.pub4.
3
Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System.修订后的国家压疮咨询委员会压力性损伤分期系统:修订后的压力性损伤分期系统。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016 Nov/Dec;43(6):585-597. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000281.
4
The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.预测危重症患者压疮的挑战。一项多中心队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Oct;13(10):1775-1783. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-154OC.
5
MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database.MIMIC-III,一个免费获取的重症监护数据库。
Sci Data. 2016 May 24;3:160035. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.35.
6
Examination of the accuracy of coding hospital-acquired pressure ulcer stages.医院获得性压疮分期编码准确性的检查
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013 Dec 24;3(4). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.003.04.b03. eCollection 2013.
7
Using EHR data to predict hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a prospective study of a Bayesian Network model.利用电子健康记录数据预测医院获得性压疮:贝叶斯网络模型的前瞻性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Nov;82(11):1059-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
8
High cost of stage IV pressure ulcers.IV 期压力性溃疡的高昂成本。
Am J Surg. 2010 Oct;200(4):473-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.021.
9
Medical device related pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients.住院患者的医疗器械相关压力性溃疡。
Int Wound J. 2010 Oct;7(5):358-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00699.x.
10
Results of the 2008-2009 International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey and a 3-year, acute care, unit-specific analysis.2008 - 2009年国际压疮患病率调查结果及一项为期3年的急性护理机构特定分析。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009 Nov 1;55(11):39-45.

非结构化临床记录中的压疮损伤:检测与解读。

Pressure Ulcer Injury in Unstructured Clinical Notes: Detection and Interpretation.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US.

Center for Data Science, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:1160-1169. eCollection 2020.

PMID:33936492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8075497/
Abstract

Hospital-acquired pressure ulcer injury (PUI) is a primary nursing quality metric, reflecting the caliber of nursing care within a hospital. Prior studies have used the Braden scale and structured data from the electronic health records to detect/predict PUI while the informative unstructured clinical notes have not been used. We propose automated PUI detection using a novel negation-detection algorithm applied to unstructured clinical notes. Our detection framework is on-demand, requiring minimal cost. In application to the MIMIC-III dataset, the text features produced using our algorithm resulted in improved PUI detection when evaluated using logistic regression, random forests, and neural networks compared to text features without negation detection. Exploratory analysis reveals substantial overlap between key classifier features and leading clinical attributes of PUI, adding interpretability to our solution. Our method could also considerably reduce nurses' evaluations by automatic detection of most cases, leaving only the most uncertain cases for nursing assessment.

摘要

医院获得性压力性溃疡损伤(PUI)是一个主要的护理质量指标,反映了医院内护理的水平。先前的研究已经使用布雷登量表和电子健康记录中的结构化数据来检测/预测 PUI,而未使用有信息的非结构化临床记录。我们提出了一种使用新颖的否定检测算法自动检测 PUI 的方法,该算法应用于非结构化临床记录。我们的检测框架是按需的,需要的成本最小。在应用于 MIMIC-III 数据集时,与未进行否定检测的文本特征相比,使用我们的算法生成的文本特征在使用逻辑回归、随机森林和神经网络进行评估时,可提高 PUI 的检测效果。探索性分析表明,关键分类器特征与 PUI 的主要临床属性之间存在大量重叠,为我们的解决方案增加了可解释性。我们的方法还可以通过自动检测大多数病例来大大减少护士的评估,只留下最不确定的病例供护理评估。