Sakamoto Wataru, Ohki Shinji, Onozawa Hisashi, Okayama Hirokazu, Endo Hisahito, Fujita Shotaro, Saito Motonobu, Saze Zenichiro, Momma Tomoyuki, Takenoshita Seiichi, Kono Koji
Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2021 Apr 28;5(2):129-136. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2020-054. eCollection 2021.
The standard strategy for advanced rectal cancer (RC) is preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT)/chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plus total mesorectal excision (TME) in Western countries; however, the survival benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy remains unclear. There is accumulating evidence that either SCRT/CRT or lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) alone may not be sufficient for local control of advanced RC. We herein retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients who were treated by SCRT/CRT+TME+LPND, particularly focusing on the prognostic impact of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (LPNM).
Patients diagnosed as having clinical Stage II and III lower RC who received SCRT/CRT+TME+LPND between 1999 and 2012 at our hospital were enrolled. Adverse events (AEs), surgery-related complications (SRC), and therapeutic effects were retrospectively analyzed.
Fifty cases (SCRT:25, CRT:25) were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), local recurrence (LR), AE, and SRC between the SCRT and CRT groups, although the pathological therapeutic effect was higher in the CRT group. The patients with LPNM showed significantly inferior 5-year OS and 5-year RFS than those without LPNM.
There were no significant differences in OS, RFS, or LR between SCRT and CRT, although CRT had a significantly greater histological therapeutic effect. The prognosis of the pathological LPNM-positive cases was significantly poorer than that of pathological LPNM-negative cases.
在西方国家,晚期直肠癌(RC)的标准治疗策略是术前短程放疗(SCRT)/同步放化疗(CRT)加全直肠系膜切除术(TME);然而,放疗联合化疗的生存获益仍不明确。越来越多的证据表明,单独的SCRT/CRT或侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术(LPND)可能不足以实现晚期RC的局部控制。我们在此回顾性评估接受SCRT/CRT+TME+LPND治疗的患者的临床结局,尤其关注侧方盆腔淋巴结转移(LPNM)的预后影响。
纳入1999年至2012年在我院接受SCRT/CRT+TME+LPND治疗的临床II期和III期低位RC患者。回顾性分析不良事件(AE)、手术相关并发症(SRC)和治疗效果。
分析了50例患者(SCRT组:25例,CRT组:25例)。SCRT组和CRT组在总生存(OS)、无复发生存(RFS)、局部复发(LR)、AE和SRC方面均未观察到显著差异,尽管CRT组的病理治疗效果更高。有LPNM的患者5年OS和5年RFS显著低于无LPNM的患者。
SCRT和CRT在OS、RFS或LR方面无显著差异,尽管CRT的组织学治疗效果显著更好。病理LPNM阳性病例的预后明显差于病理LPNM阴性病例。