Bone marrow aspirate concentrate with cancellous allograft versus iliac crest bone graft in the treatment of long bone nonunions.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) with cancellous allograft to iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) in the treatment of long bone nonunions.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single level I trauma center.

PATIENTS

26 patients with long bone diaphyseal or metaphyseal nonunions with defects >2 mm and treated with open repair and BMAC, compared to 25 patients with long bone diaphyseal or metaphyseal nonunions with defects >2 mm and treated with open repair and ICBG.

INTERVENTION

Open repair of long bone nonunion using either autologous ICBG or BMAC with cancellous allograft.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Nonunion healing, radiographically measured by the modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (mRUST) score. Secondary outcomes included risk factors associated with failed repair.

RESULTS

The union rates for the BMAC and ICBG cohorts were 75% and 78%, respectively (.8). Infection was the only risk factor of statistical significance for failure.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found no significant difference in union rate for long bone nonunions treated with ICBG or BMAC with allograft. BMAC and allograft led to 75% successful healing in this series. Given the heterogeneity of the control group and loss to follow-up, further prospective investigation should be conducted to more rigorously compare BMAC to ICBG for nonunion treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort.