Suppr超能文献

手术烟雾暴露作为职业危害的定量分析

A Quantitative Analysis of Surgical Smoke Exposure as an Occupational Hazard.

作者信息

Stewart Camille L, Raoof Mustafa, Lingeman Robert, Malkas Linda, Flores Viviana, Caldwell Kerry, Fong Yuman, Melstrom Kurt

机构信息

Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2021 Aug 1;274(2):306-311. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004920.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that OR airborne PM was different in quantity and mutagenic potential than office air and cigarette smoke.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Exposure to surgical smoke has been equated to cigarette smoking and thought to be hazardous to health care workers despite limited data.

METHODS

PM was measured during 15 operations in ORs with 24.8 ± 2.0 air changes/h, and in controls (cigarettes, office air with 1.9-2.9 air changes/h). Mutagenic potential was assessed by gamma Histone 2A family member X staining of DNA damage in small airway epithelial cells co-cultured with PM.

RESULTS

Average PM concentration during surgery was 0.002 ± 0.002 mg/m3 with maximum values at 1.08 ± 1.30 mg/m3. Greater PM correlated with more diathermy (ρ = 0.69, P = 0.006). Values were most often near zero, resulting in OR average values similar to office air (0.002 ± 0.001 mg/m3) (P = 0.32). Cigarette smoke average PM concentration was significantly higher, 4.8 ± 5.6 mg/m3 (P < 0.001). PM collected from 14 days of OR air caused DNA damage to 1.6% ± 2.7% of cultured cells, significantly less than that from office air (27.7% ± 11.7%, P = 0.02), and cigarette smoke (61.3% ± 14.3%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The air we breathe during surgery has negligible quantities of PM and mutagenic potential, likely due to low frequency of diathermy use coupled with high airflow. This suggests that exposure to surgical smoke is associated with minimal occupational risk.

摘要

目的

我们推测手术室空气中的颗粒物(PM)在数量和致突变潜力方面与办公室空气及香烟烟雾不同。

背景数据总结

尽管数据有限,但接触手术烟雾已被等同于吸烟,并被认为对医护人员有害。

方法

在换气次数为24.8±2.0次/小时的手术室中进行15台手术时测量PM,并在对照组(香烟、换气次数为1.9 - 2.9次/小时的办公室空气)中进行测量。通过对与PM共培养的小气道上皮细胞中DNA损伤进行γ组蛋白2A家族成员X染色来评估致突变潜力。

结果

手术期间PM的平均浓度为0.002±0.002毫克/立方米,最大值为1.08±1.30毫克/立方米。更高的PM与更多的电灼术相关(ρ = 0.69,P = 0.006)。数值大多接近零,导致手术室的平均值与办公室空气相似(0.002±0.001毫克/立方米)(P = 0.32)。香烟烟雾的平均PM浓度显著更高,为4.8±5.6毫克/立方米(P < 0.001)。从14天的手术室空气中收集的PM对1.6%±2.7%的培养细胞造成DNA损伤,明显少于办公室空气(27.7%±11.7%,P = 0.02)和香烟烟雾(61.3%±14.3%,P < 0.001)。

结论

手术期间我们呼吸的空气中PM含量和致突变潜力可忽略不计,这可能是由于电灼术使用频率低以及气流高所致。这表明接触手术烟雾所带来的职业风险极小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验