Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Cohen Children's Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY.
Biostatistics Unit, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021 Aug 1;73(2):197-202. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003157.
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) introduces positive pressure of air into both the trachea and stomach, which may affect gastric emptying. The rate of gastric emptying can be estimated by ultrasound (US) in neonates by two validated techniques: "antral cross-sectional area" (ACSA, two-dimensional estimate of the surface area at the gastric antrum), and "spheroid gastric volume" (spheroid, three-dimensional estimate of the stomach volume).
To compare gastric emptying rates in neonates on machine-derived nasal CPAP (MD-nCPAP, Avea and RAM cannula) with those on bubble CPAP (bCPAP, Fisher Paykel and Babi.Plus nasal prongs).
Ultrasound measurements of the amount of the milk in the stomach were performed before feeding and at 1, 2, and 3 hours after the start of feeding, using both the ACSA and spheroid methods. Rates of gastric emptying were calculated during the "early" (1-2 hours) and "late" (2-3 hours) phases after feeding.
We recruited 32 infants (25-34 weeks gestational age, full enteral tube feedings, on nasal CPAP). Seventeen infants were treated with MD-nCPAP (median birth weight 1015 g [interquartile range (IQR): 870-1300], gestational age 28 weeks [IQR: 27-29], postnatal age 20 days [IQR: 14-28]), whereas 15 infants were treated with bCPAP (median birth weight 960 g [IQR: 855-1070], gestational age 27 weeks [IQR: 26-28], postnatal age 17 days [IQR: 15-25]). Gastric emptying rates (% emptied/min) were significantly faster in the "early" compared to the "late" phase for all infants. There were no significant differences in the rates of gastric emptying (either "early" or "late") or volumes of gastric residuals between infants receiving MD-nCPAP or bCPAP, measured by either method. Although no feeding intolerance was seen in either group, the volumes of residual gastric contents measured by both methods were higher than the volumes traditionally considered abnormal when obtained by gastric tube aspiration.
Gastric emptying is faster during the "early" compared to the "late" phase. Gastric emptying rates are not different in infants receiving MD-nCPAP versus bCPAP. The presence of large residual gastric contents in infants who are tolerating feedings challenges the value of traditional gastric aspiration for the assessment of feeding tolerance in infants.
鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)将空气的正压引入气管和胃中,这可能会影响胃排空。胃排空率可以通过超声(US)在新生儿中通过两种经过验证的技术来估计:“胃窦横截面积”(ACSA,胃窦表面面积的二维估计)和“球形胃容积”(球形,胃容积的三维估计)。
比较经机器产生的鼻 CPAP(MD-nCPAP,Avea 和 RAM 管)与气泡 CPAP(bCPAP,Fisher Paykel 和 Babi.Plus 鼻叉)治疗新生儿时的胃排空率。
在喂养前和喂养开始后 1、2 和 3 小时,使用 ACSA 和球形方法对胃中奶量进行超声测量。在喂养后的“早期”(1-2 小时)和“晚期”(2-3 小时)阶段计算胃排空率。
我们招募了 32 名婴儿(胎龄 25-34 周,全肠内喂养,接受鼻 CPAP)。17 名婴儿接受 MD-nCPAP 治疗(中位出生体重 1015g [四分位距(IQR):870-1300],胎龄 28 周 [IQR:27-29],出生后年龄 20 天 [IQR:14-28]),而 15 名婴儿接受 bCPAP 治疗(中位出生体重 960g [IQR:855-1070],胎龄 27 周 [IQR:26-28],出生后年龄 17 天 [IQR:15-25])。所有婴儿的胃排空率(%排空/分钟)在“早期”阶段均明显快于“晚期”阶段。接受 MD-nCPAP 或 bCPAP 治疗的婴儿,无论是通过哪种方法测量,胃排空率(“早期”或“晚期”)或胃残留量均无显著差异。尽管两组均未出现喂养不耐受,但两种方法测量的残留胃内容物量均高于传统经胃管抽吸时认为异常的量。
与“晚期”相比,“早期”胃排空更快。接受 MD-nCPAP 与 bCPAP 的婴儿胃排空率无差异。在耐受喂养的婴儿中,通过传统的胃管抽吸获得的大量残留胃内容物表明,其用于评估喂养耐受性的价值受到了挑战。