Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Department of Dental Technology, Luminus Technical University, Amman, Jordan.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Apr-Jun;21(2):186-191. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_606_20.
The aim is to study the effect of freshly placed composite build-ups on setting of additional silicone impression materials.
In vitro - experimental study.
Three composite materials; Build-It™ F. R™, Filtek™ Bulk Fill flow and Filtek™ Z350 and three light-bodied additional silicone impression materials; Elite HD+, Aquasil LV Ultra and Express™ were used. Cylindrical-shaped specimens were made of each material (diameter 15 mm and height 10 mm). The silicone specimens were brought into contact with the composite specimens, which were either freshly cured (9 groups, n = 90) or cured and then stored in normal saline for 1 week (9 groups, n = 90). Shore A hardness (SAH) scores of silicone surfaces were recorded following the ASTM D2240-5 standards for shore A Durometer testing. Six measurements were made per each silicone surface and medians were calculated. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (SPSS v20) were used to check statistical significant differences between all groups and paired comparisons, respectively (P < 0.05).
Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.
The SAH scores of additional silicones in direct contact with freshly placed composites were significantly less than SAH scores of additional silicones in direct contact with composites specimens aged for 1 week in 7 out of 9 combinations (P < 0.05). Only when Express™ and Elite HD+ were applied over freshly placed Filtek™ Bulk Fill flow, the SAH scores difference was not statistically significant to SAH scores of matching combinations applied after 1 week of composite storage.
Freshly placed composite might affect setting of additional silicone impression materials. Dentists should carefully assess final impression on areas of prepared teeth that have received composite fillings recently.
研究新放置的复合堆积物对额外硅橡胶印模材料凝固的影响。
体外-实验研究。
使用三种复合材料;Build-It™ F. R™、Filtek™ Bulk Fill 流动和 Filtek™ Z350 以及三种轻质额外硅橡胶印模材料;Elite HD+、Aquasil LV Ultra 和 Express™。每种材料都制作出圆柱形试件(直径 15 毫米,高度 10 毫米)。硅橡胶试件与复合试件接触,复合试件要么是刚固化的(9 组,n=90),要么是固化后在生理盐水储存 1 周(9 组,n=90)。根据 ASTM D2240-5 标准的肖氏 A 硬度(SAH)测试标准,记录硅橡胶表面的 SAH 评分。对每个硅橡胶表面进行 6 次测量,计算中位数。Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney 检验(SPSS v20)分别用于检查所有组之间的统计显著差异和配对比较(P<0.05)。
Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney 检验。
在 9 种组合中的 7 种组合中,与刚放置的复合材料直接接触的额外硅橡胶的 SAH 评分明显低于与储存 1 周后的复合材料试件直接接触的额外硅橡胶的 SAH 评分(P<0.05)。只有当 Express™和 Elite HD+应用于刚放置的 Filtek™ Bulk Fill 流动时,与匹配组合应用于复合材料储存 1 周后的 SAH 评分差异无统计学意义。
新放置的复合材料可能会影响额外硅橡胶印模材料的凝固。牙医应仔细评估最近接受复合填充的预备牙区域的最终印模。