Division of Gastroenterology, Hunter Holmes McGuire Richmond VA Medical Center, Gastroenterology # 111N, Richmond, VA, 23249, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 May;67(5):1773-1782. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06980-w. Epub 2021 May 3.
Epithelial barrier function (EBF) disruption is a key mechanism underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to assess whether two novel technologies, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and mucosal integrity testing (MIT), could assess EBF.
We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing upper endoscopy for refractory GERD or non-GERD conditions. Patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, pCLE, MIT, esophageal biopsy at 2 cm and 6 cm above the esophagogastric junction, and wireless pH testing. To assess EBF in vitro, biopsies were mounted in a mini-Ussing chamber, 1 ml of fluorescein was instilled on the mucosal side, and concentration of fluorescein on the serosal side was measured at 3 h.
We enrolled 54 subjects (28 GERD, 26 non-GERD based on Lyon consensus criteria). In vivo permeability assessed by pCLE did not differ significantly between GERD vs. non-GERD patients and did not correlate with in vitro permeability. Mean MIT at 2 cm was lower in GERD compared to non-GERD (1914 vs. 3727 ohms). MIT correlated inversely with in vitro permeability at 2 cm and at 6 cm. Using a predictive model that used slope and intercept of MIT at 2 cm and 6 cm, sensitivity and specificity of MIT at identifying GERD was 76% and 72%, respectively.
pCLE did not differentiate GERD vs non-GERD and did not correlate with EBF measured in vitro. MIT, on the other hand, may be more promising as it differentiated GERD vs non-GERD and correlated with EBF measured in vitro.
上皮屏障功能(EBF)破坏是胃食管反流病(GERD)的关键机制。我们的目的是评估两种新技术,基于探头的共聚焦激光内镜检查(pCLE)和黏膜完整性测试(MIT),是否能够评估 EBF。
我们前瞻性地招募了因难治性 GERD 或非 GERD 接受上消化道内镜检查的患者。患者接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查、pCLE、MIT、食管活检(食管胃连接部上方 2cm 和 6cm 处)和无线 pH 测试。为了在体外评估 EBF,将活检标本置于迷你 Ussing 室中,在黏膜侧注入 1ml 荧光素,并在 3 小时后测量荧光素在浆膜侧的浓度。
我们共纳入 54 名受试者(28 名 GERD,26 名根据里昂共识标准为非 GERD)。pCLE 评估的体内通透性在 GERD 与非 GERD 患者之间无显著差异,且与体外通透性无关。与非 GERD 相比,GERD 患者 2cm 处的平均 MIT 较低(1914 与 3727 欧姆)。MIT 与 2cm 和 6cm 处的体外通透性呈负相关。使用 2cm 和 6cm MIT 的斜率和截距的预测模型,MIT 识别 GERD 的敏感性和特异性分别为 76%和 72%。
pCLE 不能区分 GERD 与非 GERD,也与体外测量的 EBF 无关。另一方面,MIT 可能更有前途,因为它可以区分 GERD 与非 GERD,并与体外测量的 EBF 相关。