• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于探针的共聚焦激光内镜(pCLE)与黏膜完整性测试(MIT)与上皮屏障功能和胃食管反流病(GERD)存在的相关性。

Correlation of Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) and Mucosal Integrity Testing (MIT) with Epithelial Barrier Function and Presence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Hunter Holmes McGuire Richmond VA Medical Center, Gastroenterology # 111N, Richmond, VA, 23249, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2022 May;67(5):1773-1782. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06980-w. Epub 2021 May 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-021-06980-w
PMID:33939145
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Epithelial barrier function (EBF) disruption is a key mechanism underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to assess whether two novel technologies, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and mucosal integrity testing (MIT), could assess EBF.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing upper endoscopy for refractory GERD or non-GERD conditions. Patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, pCLE, MIT, esophageal biopsy at 2 cm and 6 cm above the esophagogastric junction, and wireless pH testing. To assess EBF in vitro, biopsies were mounted in a mini-Ussing chamber, 1 ml of fluorescein was instilled on the mucosal side, and concentration of fluorescein on the serosal side was measured at 3 h.

RESULTS

We enrolled 54 subjects (28 GERD, 26 non-GERD based on Lyon consensus criteria). In vivo permeability assessed by pCLE did not differ significantly between GERD vs. non-GERD patients and did not correlate with in vitro permeability. Mean MIT at 2 cm was lower in GERD compared to non-GERD (1914 vs. 3727 ohms). MIT correlated inversely with in vitro permeability at 2 cm and at 6 cm. Using a predictive model that used slope and intercept of MIT at 2 cm and 6 cm, sensitivity and specificity of MIT at identifying GERD was 76% and 72%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

pCLE did not differentiate GERD vs non-GERD and did not correlate with EBF measured in vitro. MIT, on the other hand, may be more promising as it differentiated GERD vs non-GERD and correlated with EBF measured in vitro.

摘要

简介

上皮屏障功能(EBF)破坏是胃食管反流病(GERD)的关键机制。我们的目的是评估两种新技术,基于探头的共聚焦激光内镜检查(pCLE)和黏膜完整性测试(MIT),是否能够评估 EBF。

方法

我们前瞻性地招募了因难治性 GERD 或非 GERD 接受上消化道内镜检查的患者。患者接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查、pCLE、MIT、食管活检(食管胃连接部上方 2cm 和 6cm 处)和无线 pH 测试。为了在体外评估 EBF,将活检标本置于迷你 Ussing 室中,在黏膜侧注入 1ml 荧光素,并在 3 小时后测量荧光素在浆膜侧的浓度。

结果

我们共纳入 54 名受试者(28 名 GERD,26 名根据里昂共识标准为非 GERD)。pCLE 评估的体内通透性在 GERD 与非 GERD 患者之间无显著差异,且与体外通透性无关。与非 GERD 相比,GERD 患者 2cm 处的平均 MIT 较低(1914 与 3727 欧姆)。MIT 与 2cm 和 6cm 处的体外通透性呈负相关。使用 2cm 和 6cm MIT 的斜率和截距的预测模型,MIT 识别 GERD 的敏感性和特异性分别为 76%和 72%。

结论

pCLE 不能区分 GERD 与非 GERD,也与体外测量的 EBF 无关。另一方面,MIT 可能更有前途,因为它可以区分 GERD 与非 GERD,并与体外测量的 EBF 相关。

相似文献

1
Correlation of Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) and Mucosal Integrity Testing (MIT) with Epithelial Barrier Function and Presence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).基于探针的共聚焦激光内镜(pCLE)与黏膜完整性测试(MIT)与上皮屏障功能和胃食管反流病(GERD)存在的相关性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 May;67(5):1773-1782. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06980-w. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Mucosal integrity and sensitivity to acid in the proximal esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病患者近端食管的黏膜完整性及对酸的敏感性
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016 Jul 1;311(1):G117-22. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00134.2016. Epub 2016 May 19.
3
Esophageal sensitivity to acid in patients with Barrett's esophagus is not related to preserved esophageal mucosal integrity.巴雷特食管患者食管对酸的敏感性与食管黏膜完整性的保留无关。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Jul;29(7). doi: 10.1111/nmo.13066. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
Evaluation of Esophageal Mucosal Integrity in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病患者食管黏膜完整性的评估。
Digestion. 2018;97(1):31-37. doi: 10.1159/000484106. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Mucosal impedance testing: A new diagnostic testing in gastroesophageal reflux disease.黏膜阻抗检测:胃食管反流病的一种新的诊断检测方法。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Nov;119(11):1575-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
6
Development and Validation of a Mucosal Impedance Contour Analysis System to Distinguish Esophageal Disorders.开发并验证一种黏膜阻抗轮廓分析系统以区分食管疾病。
Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1617-1626.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.253. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
Esophageal Mucosal Impedance Patterns Discriminate Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis From Patients With GERD.食管黏膜阻抗模式可区分嗜酸性食管炎患者与 GERD 患者。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;16(5):664-671.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.020. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Esophageal intraluminal baseline impedance differentiates gastroesophageal reflux disease from functional heartburn.食管腔内基础阻抗可区分胃食管反流病与功能性烧心。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jun;13(6):1075-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.11.033. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
9
Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.食管酸暴露接近胃食管交界处的测量对诊断准确性和事件-症状相关性的影响:使用无线双 pH 监测的前瞻性研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec;104(12):2918-25. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.506. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
10
Hypersensitivity to acid is associated with impaired esophageal mucosal integrity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease with and without esophagitis.胃酸过敏与胃食管反流病患者食管黏膜完整性受损有关,无论是否存在食管炎。
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014 Aug 1;307(3):G323-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00345.2013. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular and Functional Recovery of Esophageal Barrier Integrity After Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery.腹腔镜抗反流手术后食管屏障完整性的分子与功能恢复
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-08951-x.
2
Esophageal Mucosal Impedance Assessment for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.食管黏膜阻抗评估在胃食管反流病诊断中的应用
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Jul 30;30(3):352-360. doi: 10.5056/jnm23063.
3
The role of endoscopy in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.内镜检查在胃食管反流病管理中的作用。

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical spectrum and risk factors associated with asymptomatic erosive esophagitis as determined by Los Angeles classification: A cross-sectional study.根据洛杉矶分类法确定的无症状性糜烂性食管炎的临床谱及相关危险因素:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 27;13(2):e0192739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192739. eCollection 2018.
2
Determinants of symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease: nonerosive reflux disease, symptomatic, and silent erosive reflux disease.胃食管反流病症状的决定因素:非糜烂性反流病、有症状和无症状的糜烂性反流病。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;25(7):764-71. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835f594c.
3
DEN Open. 2021 Dec 30;2(1):e86. doi: 10.1002/deo2.86. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
The Role of Intestinal Permeability in Gastrointestinal Disorders and Current Methods of Evaluation.肠道通透性在胃肠道疾病中的作用及当前评估方法
Front Nutr. 2021 Aug 26;8:717925. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.717925. eCollection 2021.
Microalterations of esophagus in patients with non-erosive reflux disease: in-vivo diagnosis by confocal laser endomicroscopy and its relationship with gastroesophageal reflux.
非糜烂性反流病患者食管的微观改变:共聚焦激光内镜诊断及其与胃食管反流的关系
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;107(6):864-74. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.44. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
4
A new method in the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis: confocal laser endomicroscopy.一种新的反流性食管炎诊断方法:共聚焦激光内镜检查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr;75(4):864-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.013. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
5
The feasibility of light microscopic measurements of intercellular spaces in squamous epithelium in the lower-esophagus of GERD patients.胃食管反流病患者食管下段鳞状上皮细胞间隙的光镜测量的可行性。
Dis Esophagus. 2011 Jan;24(1):1-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01083.x.