Department and Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Sichuan Provincial Pancreatitis Centre and West China-Liverpool Biomedical Research Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Wannan Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Liverpool Pancreatitis Research Group, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 May;67(5):1879-1889. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06982-8. Epub 2021 May 3.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Stress hyperglycemia is common in critical illness but it has not been clearly studied in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). This study aimed to investigate the specific blood glucose (BG) level that defines stress hyperglycemia and to determine the impact of stress hyperglycemia on clinical outcomes in AP patients.
AP patients admitted ≤ 48 h after abdominal pain onset were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified by pre-existing diabetes and stress hyperglycemia was defined using stratified BG levels for non-diabetes and diabetes with clinical outcomes compared.
There were 967 non-diabetic and 114 diabetic (10.5%) patients met the inclusion criteria and the clinical outcomes between these two groups were not significantly different. In non-diabetes, the cut-off BG level of ≥ 180 mg/dl was selected to define stress hyperglycemia with an 8.8-fold higher odds ratio for persistent organ failure (POF) (95% CI 5.4-14.3; P < 0.001). For diabetes, ≥ 300 mg/dl was selected with a 7.5-fold higher odds ratio for POF (95% CI 1.7-34.3; P = 0.009). In multivariable logistic regression, stress hyperglycemia was independently associated with POF, acute necrotic collection, major infection and mortality. The combination of BG and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score in predicting POF was better than SIRS or Glasgow score alone.
This study identifies a cut-off BG level of ≥ 180 mg/dl and ≥ 300 mg/dl was optimal to define stress hyperglycemia for non-diabetic and diabetic AP patients, respectively. There was a significant relationship between stress hyperglycemia and adverse clinical outcomes.
背景/目的:应激性高血糖在危重病中很常见,但在急性胰腺炎(AP)患者中尚未得到明确研究。本研究旨在探讨定义应激性高血糖的特定血糖(BG)水平,并确定 AP 患者应激性高血糖对临床结局的影响。
回顾性分析腹痛发作后≤48 小时内入院的 AP 患者。根据是否存在糖尿病对患者进行分层,并根据不同的 BG 水平定义应激性高血糖,比较两组的临床结局。
共纳入 967 例非糖尿病和 114 例糖尿病(10.5%)患者,两组患者的临床结局无显著差异。在非糖尿病患者中,选择 BG 水平≥180mg/dl 定义应激性高血糖,其持续性器官衰竭(POF)的优势比为 8.8 倍(95%CI 5.4-14.3;P<0.001)。对于糖尿病患者,选择 BG 水平≥300mg/dl 定义应激性高血糖,其 POF 的优势比为 7.5 倍(95%CI 1.7-34.3;P=0.009)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,应激性高血糖与 POF、急性坏死性积聚、主要感染和死亡率独立相关。BG 与全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)评分联合预测 POF 的效果优于 SIRS 或格拉斯哥评分单独预测。
本研究确定了非糖尿病和糖尿病 AP 患者分别定义应激性高血糖的最佳 BG 水平切点为≥180mg/dl 和≥300mg/dl。应激性高血糖与不良临床结局之间存在显著关系。