Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Y.P.).
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Aug;174(8):1145-1150. doi: 10.7326/M21-0270. Epub 2021 May 4.
In the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, a dispute arose as to whether the disease caused a typical or atypical version of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This essay recounts the emergence of ARDS and places it in the context of the technological transformation of modern hospital care-particularly the emergence of intensive care after the 1952 Copenhagen polio epidemic. The polio epidemic seemed to show the value of manual positive-pressure ventilation, leading to the proliferation of mechanical ventilators and the expansion of intensive care units in the 1960s. This created the conditions of possibility for ARDS to be described and institutionalized within modern intensive care. Yet the centrality of the ventilator to descriptions and definitions of ARDS quickly made it difficult to conceive of the disorder outside the framework of mechanical ventilation and blood gas levels, or to acknowledge the degree to which the ventilator was a source of iatrogenic injury and complications. Moreover, the imperative to understand and treat ARDS with mechanical ventilation set the stage for the early confusion about whether patients with COVID-19 should receive mechanical ventilation. This history offers many crucial lessons about how new technologies can lead to new and valuable therapies but can also subtly shape and constrain medical thinking. Moreover, ventilators not only changed how respiratory disorders were conceived; they also brought new forms of respiratory illness into existence.
在 COVID-19 大流行的早期,人们就该疾病是否引起典型或非典型的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)产生了争议。本文讲述了 ARDS 的出现,并将其置于现代医院护理技术变革的背景下,特别是 1952 年哥本哈根脊髓灰质炎疫情后重症监护的出现。脊髓灰质炎疫情似乎显示了手动正压通气的价值,导致机械呼吸机的普及和 20 世纪 60 年代重症监护病房的扩张。这为 ARDS 在现代重症监护中得到描述和制度化创造了可能性条件。然而,呼吸机在 ARDS 的描述和定义中的核心地位,很快使得人们难以在机械通气和血气水平之外理解这种疾病,也难以承认呼吸机是医源性损伤和并发症的一个来源。此外,用机械通气来理解和治疗 ARDS 的必要性为早期关于 COVID-19 患者是否应接受机械通气的困惑奠定了基础。这段历史提供了许多关于新技术如何带来新的、有价值的治疗方法,但也如何微妙地塑造和限制医学思维的重要教训。此外,呼吸机不仅改变了人们对呼吸障碍的看法,还带来了新的呼吸疾病。