• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用锥形束 CT 对颅面短小畸形患者下颌骨发育不良与面部不对称的三维分析

Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Condylar Hypoplasia and Facial Asymmetry in Craniofacial Microsomia Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

PhD candidate, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Aug;79(8):1750.e1-1750.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2021.03.015
PMID:33939960
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the condylar hypoplasia and its correlation with craniofacial deformities in adults with unilateral craniofacial microsomia (CFM).

METHODS

Pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography scans of consecutive adults (mean age: 20.4 ± 3.0 years; range: 17.3 to 31.4 years) with Pruzansky-Kaban type I and IIA CFM were reconstructed in 3D. Both condyles were segmented. Asymmetry ratios (affected side/contralateral side) of condylar volume were calculated to indicate the extent of condylar hypoplasia. 3D cephalometry was performed to quantify the maxillomandibular morphology and facial asymmetry. The correlations in between were assessed by using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Thirty-six subjects were enrolled, consisting of 22 subjects with Pruzansky-Kaban type I and 14 subjects with type IIA. The condyles in type IIA group were significantly more hypoplastic in height (asymmetry ratio: 40.69 vs 59.95%, P = .006) and volume (18.16 vs 47.84%, P < .001) compared to type I group. Type IIA group had a significantly smaller SNB value than type I group (72.94° vs 77.41°, P = .012), and a significantly greater facial asymmetry (P < .05). The hypoplastic extent of condylar volume and Pruzansky-Kaban types were significantly correlated with SNB (r = 0.457 and ρ = -0.411, respectively), upper incisor deviation (r = -0.446 and ρ = 0.362), chin deviation (r = -0.477 and ρ = 0.527), upper occlusal plane cant (r = -0.672 and ρ = 0.631), and mandibular plane cant (r = -0.557 and ρ = 0.357, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

For unilateral CFM adults, greater condylar hypoplasia in volume along with more severe mandibular retrusion and facial asymmetry objectively indicated a higher scale of Pruzansky-Kaban classification (type IIA). These quantitative distinctions are expected to enhance the diagnostic reliability of CFM.

摘要

目的

评估单侧颅面小颌畸形(CFM)成人患者髁突发育不良及其与颅面畸形的相关性。

方法

对连续的单侧颅面小颌畸形(Pruzansky-Kaban Ⅰ型和ⅡA型)成年患者(平均年龄:20.4±3.0 岁;范围:17.3 至 31.4 岁)的预处理锥形束 CT 扫描进行三维重建。分割双侧髁突。计算髁突体积的不对称比(患侧/对侧侧),以表示髁突发育不良的程度。进行三维头影测量以量化上下颌骨形态和面部不对称性。使用 Pearson 或 Spearman 相关系数评估它们之间的相关性。

结果

共纳入 36 名患者,其中 22 名患者为 Pruzansky-Kaban Ⅰ型,14 名患者为ⅡA型。ⅡA型组髁突在高度(不对称比:40.69%比 59.95%,P=0.006)和体积(18.16%比 47.84%,P<0.001)方面明显更发育不良。ⅡA型组 SNB 值明显小于Ⅰ型组(72.94°比 77.41°,P=0.012),且面部不对称性明显更大(P<0.05)。髁突体积发育不良程度和 Pruzansky-Kaban 分型与 SNB(r=0.457 和 ρ=-0.411)、上颌切牙偏斜(r=-0.446 和 ρ=0.362)、颏部偏斜(r=-0.477 和 ρ=0.527)、上颌牙合平面倾斜(r=-0.672 和 ρ=0.631)、下颌牙合平面倾斜(r=-0.557 和 ρ=0.357)显著相关(P<0.05)。

结论

对于单侧 CFM 成人患者,体积较大的髁突发育不良以及更严重的下颌后缩和面部不对称客观上表明 Pruzansky-Kaban 分类(ⅡA型)的严重程度更高。这些定量差异有望提高 CFM 的诊断可靠性。

相似文献

1
Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Condylar Hypoplasia and Facial Asymmetry in Craniofacial Microsomia Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.应用锥形束 CT 对颅面短小畸形患者下颌骨发育不良与面部不对称的三维分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Aug;79(8):1750.e1-1750.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
Is the pattern of mandibular asymmetry in mild craniofacial microsomia comparable to non-syndromic class II asymmetry?轻度颅面骨发育不全的下颌骨不对称模式是否与非综合征性 II 类不对称相似?
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jun;26(6):4603-4613. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04429-6. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
3
Three-dimensional characterization of mandibular asymmetry in craniofacial microsomia.颅颌面小颌畸形中下颌骨不对称的三维特征。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Dec;24(12):4363-4372. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03302-8. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Congenital and acquired mandibular asymmetry: Mapping growth and remodeling in 3 dimensions.先天性和后天性下颌骨不对称:三维空间中生长与重塑的映射
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Aug;150(2):238-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.015.
5
Correlations Between Mandible Condylar Structures and External Ear Deformities in Hemifacial Microsomia With Three-Dimensional Analysis.三维分析下颌髁突结构与半侧颜面短小畸形伴发外耳畸形的相关性。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Jun 1;33(4):1154-1158. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008342. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
6
Three-dimensional longitudinal changes in craniofacial growth in untreated hemifacial microsomia patients with cone-beam computed tomography.锥形束计算机断层扫描评估未治疗单侧颜面短小患者颅颌面生长的三维纵向变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):579-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.09.015.
7
Facial asymmetry outcome of orthognathic surgery in mild craniofacial microsomia compared to non-syndromic class II asymmetry.轻度颅面骨发育不全与非综合征 II 类不对称相比的正颌手术后面部不对称结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 28;28(9):502. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05899-6.
8
Part 2: Is the maxillary canting and its surgical correction in patients with CFM correlated to the mandibular deformity?第二部分:CFM 患者上颌倾斜及其手术矫正与下颌畸形是否相关?
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;46(9):1436-1440. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.044. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Condylar resorption post mandibular distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial microsomia: A retrospective study.颅颌面骨发育不全下颌骨牵引术后髁突吸收:回顾性研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2023 Nov;51(11):675-681. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
10
Comparison of the adult three-dimensional craniofacial features of patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia with and without early mandible distraction.有早期下颌骨牵张成骨与无早期下颌骨牵张成骨的单侧颅面短小畸形成年患者的三维颅面特征比较
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul;46(7):811-818. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Facial asymmetry outcome of orthognathic surgery in mild craniofacial microsomia compared to non-syndromic class II asymmetry.轻度颅面骨发育不全与非综合征 II 类不对称相比的正颌手术后面部不对称结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 28;28(9):502. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05899-6.
2
Assessment and Identification of Improvement Areas for Facial Symmetry in Hemifacial Microsomia (Type IIB) Using Three-dimensional Measurements.使用三维测量评估和识别半侧颜面短小畸形(IIB型)面部对称性的改善区域
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jun 10;12(6):e5877. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005877. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry with three-dimensional simulated images among the orthodontists and laypersons: a cross-sectional study.
正畸医生和非专业人士对面部不对称的三维模拟图像的主观评价:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 19;23(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03167-9.
4
Is the pattern of mandibular asymmetry in mild craniofacial microsomia comparable to non-syndromic class II asymmetry?轻度颅面骨发育不全的下颌骨不对称模式是否与非综合征性 II 类不对称相似?
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jun;26(6):4603-4613. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04429-6. Epub 2022 Feb 26.