• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辉瑞赞助的美国临床试验参与者的人口统计学多样性。

Demographic diversity of participants in Pfizer sponsored clinical trials in the United States.

机构信息

Pfizer Inc, 300 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States of America.

Pfizer Inc, 445 Eastern Point Rd, Groton, CT 06340, United States of America.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106421. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106421. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2021.106421
PMID:33940253
Abstract

The approval of new medicinal agents requires robust efficacy and safety clinical trial data demonstrated to be applicable to population subgroups. Limited data have previously been reported by drug sponsors on the topic of clinical trial diversity. In order to establish a baseline of diversity in our clinical trials that can be used by us and other sponsors, an analysis of clinical trial diversity was conducted covering race, ethnicity, sex, and age. This analysis includes Pfizer interventional clinical trials that initiated enrollment between 2011 through 2020. The data set comprises 213 trials with 103,103 US participants. The analysis demonstrated that overall trial participation of Black or African American individuals was at the US census level (14.3% vs 13.4%), participation of Hispanic or Latino individuals was below US census (15.9% vs 18.5%), and female participation was at US census (51.1% vs 50.8%). The analysis also examined the percentage of trials that achieved racial and ethnic distribution levels at or above census levels. Participant levels above census were achieved in 56.1% of Pfizer trials for Black or African American participants, 51.4% of trials for White participants, 16.0% of trials for Asian participants, 14.2% of trials for Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander participants, 8.5% of trials for American Indian and Alaska Native participants, and 52.3% of trials for Hispanic or Latino participants. The results presented here provide a baseline upon which we can quantify the impact of our ongoing efforts to improve racial and ethnic diversity in clinical trials.

摘要

新药物的批准需要强有力的疗效和安全性临床试验数据,这些数据必须证明适用于人群亚组。此前,药物赞助商在临床试验多样性方面的报告数据有限。为了在我们的临床试验中建立多样性基准,以便我们和其他赞助商使用,我们对临床试验多样性进行了分析,涵盖了种族、民族、性别和年龄。该分析包括辉瑞公司在 2011 年至 2020 年间启动入组的干预性临床试验。该数据集包含 213 项试验,共有 103,103 名美国参与者。分析表明,黑人或非裔美国人的总体试验参与率与美国人口普查水平相当(14.3%比 13.4%),西班牙裔或拉丁裔的参与率低于美国人口普查水平(15.9%比 18.5%),女性参与率与美国人口普查水平相当(51.1%比 50.8%)。该分析还检查了达到或超过人口普查水平的种族和民族分布水平的试验比例。在辉瑞公司的试验中,黑人或非裔美国参与者的试验水平达到或超过人口普查水平的比例为 56.1%,白人参与者的试验水平为 51.4%,亚洲参与者的试验水平为 16.0%,夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民参与者的试验水平为 14.2%,美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民参与者的试验水平为 8.5%,西班牙裔或拉丁裔参与者的试验水平为 52.3%。这里呈现的结果为我们提供了一个基准,我们可以用它来量化我们正在努力改善临床试验中种族和民族多样性的影响。

相似文献

1
Demographic diversity of participants in Pfizer sponsored clinical trials in the United States.辉瑞赞助的美国临床试验参与者的人口统计学多样性。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106421. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106421. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
2
Demographic diversity of US-based participants in GSK-sponsored interventional clinical trials.美国参与葛兰素史克赞助的介入性临床试验的参与者的人口统计学多样性。
Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;20(2):133-144. doi: 10.1177/17407745221149118. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
3
Representation of Race and Ethnicity in Randomized Clinical Trials of Diabetic Macular Edema and Retinal Vein Occlusion Compared to 2010 US Census Data.糖尿病性黄斑水肿和视网膜静脉阻塞的随机临床试验中种族和民族的代表性与 2010 年美国人口普查数据相比。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 1;140(11):1096-1102. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3929.
4
Assessment of the Inclusion of Racial/Ethnic Minority, Female, and Older Individuals in Vaccine Clinical Trials.评估种族/少数民族、女性和老年人在疫苗临床试验中的纳入情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037640. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37640.
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.种族和民族在原发性开角型青光眼临床试验中的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8348.
6
Diversity of US participants in AstraZeneca-sponsored clinical trials.阿斯利康赞助的临床试验中美国参与者的多样性。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 May;140:107496. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107496. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
7
Reporting of Participant Race and Ethnicity in Published US Pediatric Clinical Trials From 2011 to 2020.报告 2011 年至 2020 年美国儿科临床试验中参与者的种族和民族情况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 May 1;176(5):e220142. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0142. Epub 2022 May 2.
8
Race and ethnicity reporting and representation in hemophilia clinical trials.血友病临床试验中的种族和民族报告及代表性问题。
Blood Adv. 2024 May 28;8(10):2351-2360. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024012862.
9
Increasing diversity in clinical trials: demographic trends at the National Cancer Institute, 2005-2020.临床试验中的多样性增加:2005 年至 2020 年美国国家癌症研究所的人口趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jul 1;116(7):1063-1071. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae018.
10
Sex, Racial, and Ethnic Representation in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.COVID-19 临床试验中的性别、种族和民族代表性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jan 1;183(1):50-60. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5600.

引用本文的文献

1
A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding Impact of Race on the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Clinical Trials.对《致编辑的信:关于种族对托法替布治疗类风湿关节炎疗效和安全性的影响——汇总临床试验的事后分析》的回应
Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Jun;12(3):595-596. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00751-z. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
A Descriptive, Post Hoc Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Diverse Racial and Ethnic Patient Populations With Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis.一项关于司库奇尤单抗在不同种族和族裔中重度银屑病患者群体中的疗效和安全性的描述性事后分析。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Oct;14(10):2877-2887. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01268-z. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
3
Impact of Race on the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Clinical Trials.
种族对托法替布治疗类风湿关节炎疗效和安全性的影响:汇总临床试验的事后分析
Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1135-1164. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00677-y. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
4
Cognitive Assessment with Cognivue Clarity®: Psychometric Properties and Normative Ranges in a Diverse Population.认知评估与 Cognivue 清晰度®:在不同人群中的心理测量特性和常模范围。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;100(2):509-523. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240331.
5
Barriers to diverse clinical trial participation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Engaging Hispanic/Latina caregivers and health professionals.Duchenne 型肌营养不良症临床试验参与障碍:吸引西班牙裔/拉丁裔照顾者和医疗保健专业人员。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 May 21;19(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03209-7.
6
American Indian and Alaska Native recruitment strategies for health-related randomized controlled trials: A scoping review.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民健康相关随机对照试验的招募策略:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 30;19(4):e0302562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302562. eCollection 2024.
7
Assessing ascertainment bias in atrial fibrillation across US minority groups.评估美国少数族裔群体中房颤的检出偏倚。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0301991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301991. eCollection 2024.
8
Racial and ethnic diversity in global neuroscience clinical trials.全球神经科学临床试验中的种族和民族多样性。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Jan 4;37:101255. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101255. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Opportunities to Increase Science of Diversity and Inclusion in Clinical Trials: Equity and a Lack of a Control.增加临床试验多样性和包容性科学的机会:公平和缺乏对照。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 19;12(24):e030042. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030042. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
10
Representativeness in health research studies: an audit of Greater Manchester Clinical Research Network studies between 2016 and 2021.健康研究中的代表性:对大曼彻斯特临床研究网络 2016 年至 2021 年期间研究的审计。
BMC Med. 2023 Nov 29;21(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03170-5.