• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Combination of Fundal Height and Ultrasound to Predict Small for Gestational Age at Birth.宫底高度联合超声预测小于胎龄儿。
Am J Perinatol. 2023 Jan;40(2):155-162. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1728837. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Routine 36-week scan: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate.常规36周扫描:预测小于胎龄儿
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;65(1):20-29. doi: 10.1002/uog.29134. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
3
Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.32 周与 36 周常规超声检查:预测小于胎龄儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):761-768. doi: 10.1002/uog.20258. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.在 35-37 孕周的常规超声检查中预测小于胎龄儿和不良围产结局的两阶段方法。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):484-491. doi: 10.1002/uog.20391. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
5
Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.比较宫底高度测量和超声测量胎儿腹围在预测足月高和低出生体重中的应用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):566-71. doi: 10.1002/uog.6378.
6
Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants.胎盘功能生化检测与超声评估胎儿大小对死产及小于胎龄儿的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 14;5(5):CD012245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012245.pub2.
7
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks.预测 35-37 孕周的小于胎龄儿:母亲因素和 20-36 孕周间生长速度的作用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):488-495. doi: 10.1002/uog.20243.
8
Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.单胎及多胎胎儿生物测量用于检测早产及足月的小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿:一项纵向队列研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0164161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164161. eCollection 2016.
9
Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age.比较胎儿生物测量生长速度与估计胎儿体重预测新生儿小于胎龄。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Oct;35(20):3931-3936. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1844652. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
Third trimester ultrasound estimated fetal weight for increasing prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age newborns in low-risk pregnant women.孕晚期超声评估胎儿体重,以提高对低风险孕妇中小于胎龄新生儿的产前预测。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):6721-6726. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1920915. Epub 2021 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal Growth Restriction.美国妇产科医师学会临床实践通告第 204 号:胎儿生长受限。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e97-e109. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003070.
2
Cohort Profile: NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons and Twins.队列简介:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长发育研究——单胎与双胎研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 1;47(1):25-25l. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx161.
3
Clarification of estimating fetal weight between 10-14 weeks gestation, NICHD fetal growth studies.妊娠10 - 14周胎儿体重估计的说明,美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
Small for Gestational Age: The Differential Mortality When Detected versus Undetected Antenatally.小于胎龄儿:产前检测与未检测情况下的死亡率差异
Am J Perinatol. 2017 Mar;34(4):409-414. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592132. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
5
Ultrasound Quality Assurance for Singletons in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies.美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长研究中关于单胎妊娠的超声质量保证
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Aug;35(8):1725-33. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.09087. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
6
Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.胎儿生长的种族/族裔标准:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):449.e1-449.e41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.032.
7
Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation).妊娠晚期(妊娠24周后)的常规超声检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 29;2015(6):CD001451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub4.
8
Symphysis-fundus height measurement to predict small-for-gestational-age status at birth: a systematic review.通过测量耻骨联合上缘至宫底高度预测出生时小于胎龄儿状态:一项系统评价
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 10;15:22. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0461-z.
9
Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study.产前检测胎儿生长受限效果不佳及其对产科管理和新生儿结局的影响:一项法国全国性研究。
BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):518-27. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13148. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
10
A revised birth weight reference for the United States.美国修订后的出生体重参考值。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;124(1):16-22. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000345.

宫底高度联合超声预测小于胎龄儿。

Combination of Fundal Height and Ultrasound to Predict Small for Gestational Age at Birth.

机构信息

Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.

Biostatistics Research Branch, Division Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2023 Jan;40(2):155-162. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1728837. Epub 2021 May 3.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1728837
PMID:33940642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8802337/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine whether adding longitudinal measures of fundal height (FH) to the standard cross-sectional FH to trigger third trimester ultrasound estimated fetal weight (EFW) would improve small for gestational age (SGA) prediction.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed a longitudinal FH calculator in a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of 1,939 nonobese pregnant women who underwent serial FH evaluations at 12 U.S. clinical sites. We evaluated cross-sectional FH measurement ≤ -3 cm at visit 3 (mean: 32.0 ± 1.6 weeks) versus the addition of longitudinal FH up to and including visit 3 to trigger an ultrasound to diagnose SGA defined as birth weight <10th percentile. If the FH cut points were not met, the SGA screen was classified as negative. If FH cut points were met and EFW was <10th percentile, the SGA screen was considered positive. If EFW was ≥10th percentile, the SGA screen was also considered negative. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were computed.

RESULTS

In a comparison of methods, 5.8% of women were classified as at risk of SGA by both cross-sectional and longitudinal classification methods; cross-sectional FH identified an additional 4.0%, and longitudinal fundal height identified a separate, additional 4.5%.Using cross-sectional FH as an ultrasound trigger, EFW had a PPV and NPV for SGA of 69 and 92%, respectively. After adding longitudinal FH, PPV increased to 74%, whereas NPV of 92% remained unchanged; however, the number of women who underwent triggered EFW decreased from 9.7 to 5.7%.

CONCLUSION

An innovative approach for calculating longitudinal FH to the standard cross-sectional FH improved identification of SGA birth weight, while simultaneously reducing the number of triggered ultrasounds. As an essentially free-of-charge screening test, our novel method has potential to decrease costs as well as perinatal morbidity and mortality (through better prediction of SGA).

KEY POINTS

· We have developed an innovative calculator for fundal height trajectory.. · Longitudinal fundal height improves detection of SGA.. · As a low cost screening test, the fundal height calculator may decrease costs and morbidity through better prediction of SGA..

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定将标准的横断面宫底高度(FH)纵向测量添加到估计胎儿体重(EFW)的第三个三个月超声中,是否会改善对胎儿生长受限(SGA)的预测。

研究设计

我们在一项前瞻性队列研究的二次分析中开发了一种纵向 FH 计算器,该研究纳入了 1939 名非肥胖孕妇,这些孕妇在美国 12 个临床地点接受了系列 FH 评估。我们评估了 3 次就诊时的横断面 FH 测量值≤-3cm(平均值:32.0±1.6 周)与添加直至包括 3 次就诊的纵向 FH 之间的关系,以触发超声诊断 SGA,定义为出生体重<第 10 个百分位数。如果未达到 FH 切点,则将 SGA 筛查归类为阴性。如果 FH 切点符合且 EFW<第 10 个百分位数,则将 SGA 筛查视为阳性。如果 EFW≥第 10 个百分位数,则 SGA 筛查也被视为阴性。计算了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。

结果

在方法比较中,5.8%的女性通过横断面和纵向分类方法被归类为 SGA 风险;横断面 FH 另外识别出 4.0%,纵向宫底高度另外识别出 4.5%。使用横断面 FH 作为超声触发因素,EFW 对 SGA 的 PPV 和 NPV 分别为 69%和 92%。添加纵向 FH 后,PPV 增加到 74%,而 NPV 保持在 92%不变;然而,接受触发 EFW 的女性数量从 9.7 减少到 5.7。

结论

一种创新的计算标准横断面 FH 的纵向 FH 的方法,提高了对 SGA 出生体重的识别能力,同时减少了触发超声的数量。作为一种基本上免费的筛查试验,我们的新方法有可能通过更好地预测 SGA 来降低成本以及围产期发病率和死亡率。

关键点

·我们已经开发了一种用于宫底高度轨迹的创新计算器。·纵向宫底高度提高了 SGA 的检出率。·作为一种低成本的筛查试验,宫底高度计算器可以通过更好地预测 SGA 来降低成本和发病率。