• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者及全科医生对第二原发性癌症诊断途径的体验:一项定性研究。

Patient and GP experiences of pathways to diagnosis of a second primary cancer: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Cavers Debbie, Duff Rhona, Bikker Annemieke, Barnett Karen, Kanguru Lovney, Weller David, Brewster David H, Campbell Christine

机构信息

Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2021 May 3;21(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08238-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-021-08238-0
PMID:33941114
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8094599/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

More people are surviving a first primary cancer and experiencing a second, different cancer. However, little is known about the diagnostic journeys of patients with second primary cancer (SPC). This study explores the views of patients and general practitioners (GPs) on their experiences of pathways to diagnosis of SPC, including the influence of a previous diagnosis of cancer on symptom appraisal, help-seeking and referral decisions.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews with patients with a SPC diagnosis and case-linked GP interviews in a Scottish primary care setting. In-depth face to face or telephone interviews were conducted, underpinned by a social constructionist approach. Interviews were transcribed and Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis undertaken. Three analysts from the research team read transcripts and developed the coding framework using QSR NVivo version 10, with input from a fourth researcher. Themes were developed from refined codes and interpreted in the context of existing literature and theory.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with 23 patients (aged 43-84 years) with a SPC diagnosis, and 7 GPs. Five patient themes were identified: Awareness of SPC, symptom appraisal and help-seeking, pathways to diagnosis, navigating the healthcare system, and impact of SPC. GPs interviews identified: experience and knowledge of SPC and referrals and decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

Insights into the pathway to diagnosis of SPC highlights the need for increased awareness of and vigilance for SPC among patients and healthcare providers (HCPs), and emotional support to manage the psychosocial burden.

摘要

背景

越来越多的人在首次原发性癌症中存活下来,并患上了第二种不同的癌症。然而,对于第二原发性癌症(SPC)患者的诊断过程却知之甚少。本研究探讨了患者和全科医生(GP)对SPC诊断途径的看法,包括先前癌症诊断对症状评估、寻求帮助和转诊决定的影响。

方法

在苏格兰初级保健环境中,对患有SPC的患者进行定性访谈,并对与病例相关的全科医生进行访谈。采用社会建构主义方法,进行深入的面对面或电话访谈。访谈内容被转录,并采用布劳恩和克拉克的主题分析法进行分析。研究团队的三位分析师阅读了访谈记录,并使用QSR NVivo 10版本开发了编码框架,第四位研究人员也提供了意见。主题是从精炼的代码中发展而来,并在现有文献和理论的背景下进行解释。

结果

对23名确诊为SPC的患者(年龄在43 - 84岁之间)和7名全科医生进行了访谈。确定了五个患者主题:对SPC的认识、症状评估与寻求帮助、诊断途径、在医疗系统中导航以及SPC的影响。全科医生访谈确定了:对SPC的经验和知识以及转诊与决策。

结论

对SPC诊断途径的深入了解凸显了患者和医疗服务提供者(HCPs)提高对SPC的认识和警惕性的必要性,以及提供情感支持以应对心理社会负担的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdb/8094599/aa41df3c24c3/12885_2021_8238_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdb/8094599/c70b7e3c1985/12885_2021_8238_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdb/8094599/aa41df3c24c3/12885_2021_8238_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdb/8094599/c70b7e3c1985/12885_2021_8238_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdb/8094599/aa41df3c24c3/12885_2021_8238_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient and GP experiences of pathways to diagnosis of a second primary cancer: a qualitative study.患者及全科医生对第二原发性癌症诊断途径的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 3;21(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08238-0.
2
Missed opportunities for diagnosing brain tumours in primary care: a qualitative study of patient experiences.错失初级保健中脑瘤诊断机会的研究:一项基于患者体验的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Apr;69(681):e224-e235. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701861. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
3
'Treading water but drowning slowly': what are GPs' experiences of living and working with mental illness and distress in England? A qualitative study.“如履薄冰却逐渐溺水”:英国全科医生在生活和工作中经历的精神疾病和困扰是什么?一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 3;8(5):e018620. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018620.
4
How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs' view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany.如何做出充分的决策?德国柏林全科医生对自行就诊和医生转诊急诊就诊决策的看法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 2;9(4):e026786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026786.
5
Pathways to Lung Cancer Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study of Patients and General Practitioners about Diagnostic and Pretreatment Intervals.肺癌诊断途径:一项关于诊断和治疗前间隔的患者和全科医生的定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 May;14(5):742-753. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-817OC.
6
Palliative care referral practices and perceptions: the divide between metropolitan and non-metropolitan general practitioners.姑息治疗转介实践和观念:大都市和非大都市全科医生之间的分歧。
Palliat Support Care. 2011 Jun;9(2):181-9. doi: 10.1017/S1478951511000058.
7
Women's appraisal of the management of vulvodynia by their general practitioner: a qualitative study.女性对全科医生治疗外阴痛的评价:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 18;36(6):791-796. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz021.
8
Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice.影响澳大利亚全科医疗中产妇护理模式转诊的因素。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0296537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296537. eCollection 2024.
9
What are the sources of stress and distress for general practitioners working in England? A qualitative study.在英国工作的全科医生面临的压力和困扰来源有哪些?一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 11;8(1):e017361. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017361.
10
GPs' perceptions and experiences of public awareness campaigns for cancer: a qualitative enquiry.全科医生对癌症公众宣传活动的看法与体验:一项质性研究
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):377-87. doi: 10.1111/hex.12362. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathways to lung cancer diagnosis among individuals who did not receive lung cancer screening: a qualitative study.未接受肺癌筛查人群的肺癌诊断途径:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Oct 3;24(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02158-7.
2
Pathways to ovarian cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study.卵巢癌诊断途径:一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02016-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating diagnostic strategies for early detection of cancer: the CanTest framework.评估癌症早期检测诊断策略:CanTest 框架。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5746-6.
2
Do cognitive heuristics underpin symptom appraisal for symptoms of cancer?: A secondary qualitative analysis across seven cancers.认知启发法是否为癌症症状的症状评估提供了依据?:跨越七种癌症的二次定性分析。
Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):1041-1047. doi: 10.1002/pon.5049. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
3
Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking.
摆脱眼镜蛇效应:主题浮现、三角验证、饱和和成员核查问题化。
Med Educ. 2017 Jan;51(1):40-50. doi: 10.1111/medu.13124.
4
Post-sampling mortality and non-response patterns in the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey: Implications for epidemiological studies based on surveys of cancer patients.英国癌症患者体验调查中的抽样后死亡率和无应答模式:对基于癌症患者调查的流行病学研究的启示
Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;41:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.12.010. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
5
The expanding role of primary care in cancer control.初级保健在癌症控制中的作用不断扩大。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(12):1231-72. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00205-3.
6
Cancer detection in primary care: insights from general practitioners.基层医疗中的癌症检测:全科医生的见解。
Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 31;112 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S41-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.41.
7
Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review.有症状癌症的诊断和治疗时间增加是否与较差的预后相关?系统评价。
Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 31;112 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S92-107. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.48.
8
Screening for prevention and early diagnosis of cancer.癌症的预防和早期诊断筛查。
Am Psychol. 2015 Feb-Mar;70(2):119-33. doi: 10.1037/a0037357.
9
Risk of second cancers cancer after a first primary breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.首次原发性乳腺癌后第二癌症(继发性癌症)的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jan;136(1):158-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.029. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
10
Second primary cancer risk - the impact of applying different definitions of multiple primaries: results from a retrospective population-based cancer registry study.第二原发性癌症风险——应用多种原发性癌症不同定义的影响:一项基于人群的回顾性癌症登记研究结果
BMC Cancer. 2014 Apr 18;14:272. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-272.