School of Business, Guangxi University XingJian College of Science and Liberal Arts, Nanning, China.
J Pers Assess. 2022 Jan-Feb;104(1):64-73. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1912059. Epub 2021 May 4.
Despite overwhelming evidence supporting the unidimensional structure of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) across various language adaptations, a multifactor structure has frequently been identified for the Chinese version (GSES-C), leading some researchers to conclude that the GSES-C is multidimensional. However, the multifactor structure might derive from common method bias, such as wording effects. To test this postulation, a sample of 1,515 college students completed the GSES-C, then 507 of the sample additionally completed 3 other criteria scales. The research approach included logistic-semantic analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis of single-factor and bifactor models. The study yielded 3 main findings: (a) There were 2 common wording factors underlying the GSES-C: "uncertain situation wording" and "hypothetical wording." (b) Although the 1-factor model of the GSES-C did not fit the data, unidimensionality was supported when the 2 wording factors were controlled for in a bifactor model, indicating that the wording effects emerged. (c) The correlation coefficients between the general factor and external positive constructs were substantially underestimated if the wording effects were not controlled. The reasons for and the meanings of the wording effects underlying the GSES-C are also discussed.
尽管大量证据支持一般自我效能感量表(GSES)在各种语言适应中的单维结构,但中文版(GSES-C)经常被发现具有多因素结构,这导致一些研究人员得出结论,即 GSES-C 是多维的。然而,这种多因素结构可能源于共同方法偏差,例如措辞效应。为了验证这一假设,一个由 1515 名大学生组成的样本完成了 GSES-C,然后其中 507 名学生另外完成了 3 个其他标准量表。研究方法包括逻辑语义分析、探索性因素分析和单因素和双因素模型的验证性因素分析。研究得出了 3 个主要发现:(a)GSES-C 有 2 个共同的措辞因素:“不确定情况措辞”和“假设措辞”。(b)尽管 GSES-C 的 1 因素模型不符合数据,但在双因素模型中控制了这 2 个措辞因素后,单维性得到了支持,表明措辞效应出现了。(c)如果不控制措辞效应,一般因素与外部积极构念之间的相关系数会被大大低估。还讨论了 GSES-C 中措辞效应的原因和含义。