• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多维结构还是用词效应?对中国一般自我效能感量表的因子结构的再检验。

Multidimensional Structure or Wording Effect? Reexamination of the Factor Structure of the Chinese General Self-Efficacy Scale.

机构信息

School of Business, Guangxi University XingJian College of Science and Liberal Arts, Nanning, China.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2022 Jan-Feb;104(1):64-73. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1912059. Epub 2021 May 4.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2021.1912059
PMID:33945372
Abstract

Despite overwhelming evidence supporting the unidimensional structure of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) across various language adaptations, a multifactor structure has frequently been identified for the Chinese version (GSES-C), leading some researchers to conclude that the GSES-C is multidimensional. However, the multifactor structure might derive from common method bias, such as wording effects. To test this postulation, a sample of 1,515 college students completed the GSES-C, then 507 of the sample additionally completed 3 other criteria scales. The research approach included logistic-semantic analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis of single-factor and bifactor models. The study yielded 3 main findings: (a) There were 2 common wording factors underlying the GSES-C: "uncertain situation wording" and "hypothetical wording." (b) Although the 1-factor model of the GSES-C did not fit the data, unidimensionality was supported when the 2 wording factors were controlled for in a bifactor model, indicating that the wording effects emerged. (c) The correlation coefficients between the general factor and external positive constructs were substantially underestimated if the wording effects were not controlled. The reasons for and the meanings of the wording effects underlying the GSES-C are also discussed.

摘要

尽管大量证据支持一般自我效能感量表(GSES)在各种语言适应中的单维结构,但中文版(GSES-C)经常被发现具有多因素结构,这导致一些研究人员得出结论,即 GSES-C 是多维的。然而,这种多因素结构可能源于共同方法偏差,例如措辞效应。为了验证这一假设,一个由 1515 名大学生组成的样本完成了 GSES-C,然后其中 507 名学生另外完成了 3 个其他标准量表。研究方法包括逻辑语义分析、探索性因素分析和单因素和双因素模型的验证性因素分析。研究得出了 3 个主要发现:(a)GSES-C 有 2 个共同的措辞因素:“不确定情况措辞”和“假设措辞”。(b)尽管 GSES-C 的 1 因素模型不符合数据,但在双因素模型中控制了这 2 个措辞因素后,单维性得到了支持,表明措辞效应出现了。(c)如果不控制措辞效应,一般因素与外部积极构念之间的相关系数会被大大低估。还讨论了 GSES-C 中措辞效应的原因和含义。

相似文献

1
Multidimensional Structure or Wording Effect? Reexamination of the Factor Structure of the Chinese General Self-Efficacy Scale.多维结构还是用词效应?对中国一般自我效能感量表的因子结构的再检验。
J Pers Assess. 2022 Jan-Feb;104(1):64-73. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1912059. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
[The general self-efficacy scale (GSES): Reevaluation of its reliability and validity evidence in Chile].[一般自我效能感量表(GSES):对其在智利的信效度证据的重新评估]
Rev Med Chil. 2020 Oct;148(10):1452-1460. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872020001001452.
3
Chinese translation and psychometric testing of the cardiac self-efficacy scale in patients with coronary heart disease in mainland China.中国内地冠心病患者心脏自我效能量表的中文翻译及心理计量学测试。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Mar 12;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0872-4.
4
Validation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale among Qatari young women.卡塔尔年轻女性一般自我效能感量表的验证
East Mediterr Health J. 2016 Mar 15;21(12):891-6. doi: 10.26719/2015.21.12.891.
5
Validation of the Chinese version of joint protection self-efficacy scale in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.中文版关节保护自我效能感量表在类风湿关节炎患者中的验证。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;38(8):2119-2127. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04510-8. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Wording Effects in Assessment: Missing the Trees for the Forest.评估中的措辞效应:只见树木,不见森林。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Sep-Oct;57(5):718-734. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1925075. Epub 2021 May 28.
7
The coexistence of coping resources and specific coping styles in stress: evidence from full information item bifactor analysis.压力中应对资源与特定应对方式的共存:来自全信息项目双因素分析的证据
PLoS One. 2014 May 1;9(5):e96451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096451. eCollection 2014.
8
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) in a large and representative Swedish sample: is the use of the total scale and subscale scores justified?基于大样本和代表性瑞典样本的证据为本实践态度量表(EBPAS)的验证性因子分析:使用总量表和分量表得分是否合理?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01126-4.
9
Translation and Validation of a Chinese Version of the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors.社区中风幸存者中卒中自我效能问卷中文版的翻译与验证
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Jun;23(3):163-9. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2015.1122265. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
10
An examination of the wording effect in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among culturally Chinese people.对文化背景为华人的群体在罗森伯格自尊量表中的措辞效应进行的一项研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2008 Oct;148(5):535-51. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.5.535-552.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological and cultural correlates of illness conception and menopausal symptoms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal comparative study of Mosuo, Yi, and Han women.疾病认知与更年期症状的心理及文化关联:摩梭族、彝族和汉族女性的横断面与纵向比较研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 21;16:1496889. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1496889. eCollection 2025.
2
Compliance with oral nutritional supplements and its influencing factors in postoperative patients with digestive tract tumors: a cross-sectional study.消化道肿瘤术后患者口服营养补充剂的依从性及其影响因素:一项横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 5;23(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02010-y.
3
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the 8-item CES-D: a national longitudinal sample of Chinese adolescents.
8 项 CES-D 量表的因子结构和测量不变性:中国青少年的全国纵向样本。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 22;23(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05316-4.
4
Modeling insufficient effort responses in mixed-worded scales.混合措辞量表中努力反应不足的建模
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):2260-2272. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02146-w. Epub 2023 Jun 21.