• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

典型干旱区与资源开发区可持续性评估与提升策略研究。

Sustainability assessment and improvement strategies research for typical arid and resource-developing regions.

机构信息

Luzhou Vocational and Technical College, Luzhou, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0251088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251088. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0251088
PMID:33945573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8096093/
Abstract

Located in the Eurasian continent's hinterland, Xinjiang is a typical arid and resource-developing region in China's northwest. Problems such as excessive resource consumption, environmental pollution, and ecological imbalance are becoming severe, which have become the bottleneck that further restricts Xinjiang's sustainable development. Due to its outstanding quantitative advantages, ecological efficiency has become a significant indicator and analytical tool for measuring the green economy and sustainable development. In this study, we analyzed ecological efficiency variation for Xinjiang's 14 prefectures between 2001 and 2015 using a super-efficient data envelopment model (DEA), Malmquist Index, and Tobit model. These analyses indicated that: (1) The overall ecological efficiency level of Xinjiang is low, and development among regions is unbalanced, out of sync, lacks sustainability. (2) From 2001 to 2015, Xinjiang's ecological efficiency showed a W-shaped rising trend and finally increased by 5.7%. It is due to the substantial improvement in environmental efficiency. (3) By analyzing the environmental efficiency and resource efficiency, 14 prefectures in Xinjiang consist of four development modes: low energy consumption and low emission, high energy consumption and low emission, low energy consumption and high emission, and high energy consumption and high emission. (4) Water resources are restricting factors of arid regions. In most prefectures, there exist excessive water resource investment, excessive COD, and NH3-N emissions. (5) By analyzing the Malmquist index, it shows that the technical progress index(TC) restricted ecological efficiency. In contrast, the technical efficiency index (EC) promoted ecological efficiency.(6)The ecological efficiency was positively correlated with the utilization of foreign capital, urbanization rate, and average education degree but negatively correlated with the marketization degree. The study has guidance and reference function for the sustainable development of Xinjiang-a vital corridor of the Silk Road Economic Belt, and also provides a reference to the research work of other arid resource-based regions.

摘要

位于亚欧大陆腹地的新疆,是中国西北典型的资源开发与生态脆弱并存区。资源消耗过度、环境污染和生态失衡等问题日益严重,已成为进一步制约新疆可持续发展的瓶颈。生态效率以其突出的数量优势,成为衡量绿色经济和可持续发展的重要指标和分析工具。本文运用超效率数据包络模型(DEA)、Malmquist 指数和 Tobit 模型,对 2001—2015 年新疆 14 个地州市的生态效率变动进行了分析。结果表明:①新疆整体生态效率水平低,区域发展不平衡,失调失续;②2001—2015 年新疆生态效率呈“W”型上升趋势,最终增长 5.7%,主要得益于环境效率的大幅提升;③通过对环境效率和资源效率的分析,新疆 14 个地州市可划分为低能耗低排放、高能耗低排放、低能耗高排放和高能耗高排放四种发展模式;④水资源是干旱区的制约因素,多数地州市存在水资源投入过度、COD 和 NH3-N 排放过量问题;⑤Malmquist 指数分析表明技术进步指数(TC)是制约生态效率的主要因素,而技术效率指数(EC)则促进了生态效率的提升;⑥生态效率与利用外资、城镇化率、平均受教育年限呈显著正相关,与市场化程度呈显著负相关。本研究对“丝绸之路经济带”核心区——新疆的可持续发展具有指导和借鉴意义,也为其他干旱资源型地区的研究工作提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/16d80884b325/pone.0251088.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/b27b375a9b59/pone.0251088.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/0dbc11ac6d56/pone.0251088.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/c03d23ed6839/pone.0251088.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/0ef70ac5e87d/pone.0251088.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/0faae393686a/pone.0251088.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/f1c9f21e4d51/pone.0251088.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/16d80884b325/pone.0251088.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/b27b375a9b59/pone.0251088.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/0dbc11ac6d56/pone.0251088.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/c03d23ed6839/pone.0251088.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/0ef70ac5e87d/pone.0251088.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/0faae393686a/pone.0251088.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/f1c9f21e4d51/pone.0251088.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f4/8096093/16d80884b325/pone.0251088.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Sustainability assessment and improvement strategies research for typical arid and resource-developing regions.典型干旱区与资源开发区可持续性评估与提升策略研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0251088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251088. eCollection 2021.
2
An empirical study on industrial eco-efficiency in arid resource exploitation region of northwest China.中国西北地区干旱资源开发区工业生态效率的实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(38):53394-53411. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14438-9. Epub 2021 May 24.
3
The evolution and determinants of Chinese inter-provincial green development efficiency: an MCSE-DEA-Tobit-based perspective.中国省际绿色发展效率的演变及其决定因素:基于 MCSE-DEA-Tobit 的视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):53904-53919. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25894-w. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
4
Two-Stage Super-Efficiency Slacks-Based Model to Assess China's Ecological Wellbeing.两阶段超效率松弛基模型评估中国生态福祉。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 26;17(19):7045. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197045.
5
Measuring and decomposing natural capital use in Xinjiang from a regional-industry perspective.从区域-产业视角衡量与分解新疆自然资本利用情况
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 18;10(4):e26499. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26499. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
6
Assessment of the water resource carrying capacity based on the ecological footprint: a case study in Zhangjiakou City, North China.基于生态足迹的水资源承载力评价——以华北地区张家口市为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Apr;26(11):11000-11011. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04414-9. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
7
Ecological efficiency in China and its influencing factors-a super-efficient SBM metafrontier-Malmquist-Tobit model study.中国的生态效率及其影响因素——基于超效率 SBM 前沿- Malmquist-Tobit 模型的研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jul;25(21):20880-20898. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1949-7. Epub 2018 May 15.
8
Applying the Super-EBM model and spatial Durbin model to examining total-factor ecological efficiency from a multi-dimensional perspective: evidence from China.运用超 EBM 模型和空间杜宾模型从多维视角考察全要素生态效率:来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(2):2183-2202. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15770-w. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
9
Decoupling of water resources utilization and coordinated economic development in China's Hexi Corridor based on ecological water resource footprint.基于生态水资源足迹的中国河西走廊水资源利用与经济协调发展脱钩研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(60):90936-90947. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21732-7. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
10
Research on the ecological efficiency of the Yangtze River Delta region in China from the perspective of sustainable development of the economy-energy-environment (3E) system.从经济-能源-环境(3E)系统可持续发展的角度研究中国长三角地区的生态效率。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Oct;25(29):29192-29207. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2852-y. Epub 2018 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Study of coordinated development of county urbanization in arid areas of China: The case of Xinjiang.中国干旱地区县域城镇化协调发展研究:以新疆为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0276235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276235. eCollection 2022.
2
Effects of Industrial Structure Adjustment on Pollutants Discharged to the Aquatic Environment in Northwest China.中国西北地区产业结构调整对水环境污染的影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 18;19(10):6146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106146.

本文引用的文献

1
Eco-efficiency and agricultural innovation systems in developing countries: Evidence from macro-level analysis.发展中国家的生态效率和农业创新系统:来自宏观层面分析的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 5;14(4):e0214115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214115. eCollection 2019.
2
The Relationship of Dairy Farm Eco-Efficiency with Intensification and Self-Sufficiency. Evidence from the French Dairy Sector Using Life Cycle Analysis, Data Envelopment Analysis and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling.奶牛场生态效率与集约化和自给自足的关系。来自法国乳业部门的证据,采用生命周期分析、数据包络分析和偏最小二乘结构方程模型。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0166445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166445. eCollection 2016.
3
Opportunity cost based analysis of corporate eco-efficiency: a methodology and its application to the CO2-efficiency of German companies.
基于机会成本的企业生态效率分析:方法学及其在德企二氧化碳效率中的应用。
J Environ Manage. 2010 Oct;91(10):1997-2007. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
4
Aggregate eco-efficiency indices for New Zealand--a principal components analysis.新西兰的综合生态效率指数——主成分分析
J Environ Manage. 2004 Dec;73(4):293-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.07.002.