• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰岛素甘精 300U/mL 与甘精 100U/mL 在东亚 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和低血糖事件中的比较:来自 3 期研究的患者水平汇总分析。

Comparison of insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus glargine 100 U/mL on glycemic control and hypoglycemic events in East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: A Patient-level meta-analysis of phase 3 studies.

机构信息

Peking University People's Hospital, China.

Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, China.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;176:108848. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108848. Epub 2021 May 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108848
PMID:33945841
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate efficacy and safety of Gla-300 with Gla-100 in a patient-level meta-analysis among large East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

A patient level meta-analysis of three EDITION studies with similar design and endpoints were conducted over 6-months treatment period. The analysis included 547 patients treated with Gla-300 and 348 patients treated with Gla-100.

RESULTS

Over 6-month treatment period, mean change in HbA1c was similar for Gla-300 [Least square (LS) mean, (SE): -1.13 (0.05) % and Gla-100: -1.14 (0.05) %], showing non-inferiority of Gla-300 to Gla-100 (LS mean difference: 0.02%, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.11). Gla-300 was associated with reduced risk of hypoglycemic event (confirmed ≤ 3.9 mmol/L or severe) vs Gla-100 at any time of day or at night (00:00-05:59 h). The event rates of hypoglycemia were consistently lower with Gla-300 than Gla-100. Severe hypoglycemia was rare in both treatment groups. Weight gain was minimal in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Gla-300 provides comparable glycemic control to Gla-100 in East Asian patients with broad clinical spectrum of T2DM, with consistently less hypoglycemia at any time of the day and night.

摘要

目的

在东亚 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)大患者人群中进行一项基于患者水平的荟萃分析,评估 Gla-300 联合 Gla-100 的疗效和安全性。

方法

对三项具有相似设计和终点的 EDITION 研究进行基于患者水平的荟萃分析,治疗期为 6 个月。该分析纳入了 547 例接受 Gla-300 治疗的患者和 348 例接受 Gla-100 治疗的患者。

结果

在 6 个月的治疗期间,Gla-300 [最小二乘(LS)均数,(SE):-1.13(0.05)%]和 Gla-100 [LS 均数:-1.14(0.05)%]组的 HbA1c 均值变化相似,表明 Gla-300 与 Gla-100 相比具有非劣效性(LS 均数差值:0.02%,95%CI:-0.08 至 0.11)。Gla-300 与任何时间(包括夜间 00:00-05:59 时)的低血糖事件(确诊≤3.9mmol/L 或严重低血糖)风险降低相关。Gla-300 组的低血糖事件发生率始终低于 Gla-100 组。两组的严重低血糖均罕见。两组的体重增加均较少。

结论

Gla-300 在东亚 T2DM 患者中提供了与 Gla-100 相当的血糖控制效果,在任何时间的日间和夜间均具有一致更低的低血糖风险。

相似文献

1
Comparison of insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus glargine 100 U/mL on glycemic control and hypoglycemic events in East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: A Patient-level meta-analysis of phase 3 studies.胰岛素甘精 300U/mL 与甘精 100U/mL 在东亚 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和低血糖事件中的比较:来自 3 期研究的患者水平汇总分析。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;176:108848. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108848. Epub 2021 May 1.
2
Patient-level meta-analysis of the EDITION 1, 2 and 3 studies: glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes.1、2、3期研究的患者水平荟萃分析:2型糖尿病患者中,新型300 U/ml甘精胰岛素与100 U/ml甘精胰岛素的血糖控制及低血糖情况对比
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Sep;17(9):859-67. doi: 10.1111/dom.12485. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
3
Better glycaemic control and less hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL vs glargine 100 U/mL: 1-year patient-level meta-analysis of the EDITION clinical studies in people with type 2 diabetes.甘精胰岛素 300U/mL 与甘精胰岛素 100U/mL 相比:改善血糖控制,减少低血糖——2 型糖尿病患者 EDITION 临床研究的 1 年患者水平荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Mar;20(3):541-548. doi: 10.1111/dom.13105. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 2).在使用基础胰岛素和口服降糖药的日本2型糖尿病患者中,新型甘精胰岛素300 U/ml与甘精胰岛素100 U/ml的比较:一项随机对照试验(EDITION JP 2)中的血糖控制和低血糖情况
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Apr;18(4):366-74. doi: 10.1111/dom.12618. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
5
Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia risk with insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus glargine 100 U/mL: A patient-level meta-analysis examining older and younger adults with type 2 diabetes.胰岛素甘精 300U/mL 与甘精 100U/mL 对血糖控制和低血糖风险的影响:一项对老年和年轻 2 型糖尿病患者的患者水平荟萃分析。
Diabetes Metab. 2020 Apr;46(2):110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
6
New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 1).在日本1型糖尿病成人患者中,基础胰岛素和餐时胰岛素联用甘精胰岛素300 U/ml与100 U/ml的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验(EDITION JP 1)中的血糖控制和低血糖情况
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Apr;18(4):375-83. doi: 10.1111/dom.12619. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
7
Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus insulin glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: the EDITION 2 randomized 12-month trial including 6-month extension.在使用基础胰岛素和口服降糖药的2型糖尿病患者中,比较新型300 U/ml甘精胰岛素与100 U/ml甘精胰岛素的血糖控制及低血糖情况:EDITION 2随机12个月试验(包括6个月延长期)
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Dec;17(12):1142-9. doi: 10.1111/dom.12532. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
Effectiveness of insulin glargine U-300 versus insulin glargine U-100 on nocturnal hypoglycemia and glycemic control in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胰岛素甘精 U-300 对比胰岛素甘精 U-100 对 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者夜间低血糖及血糖控制的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Mar;56(3):355-364. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1258-0. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
9
One-year sustained glycaemic control and less hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes using basal plus meal-time insulin: the EDITION 1 12-month randomized trial, including 6-month extension.与100 U/ml的甘精胰岛素相比,使用300 U/ml的新型甘精胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者进行基础加餐时胰岛素治疗,可实现一年的持续血糖控制且低血糖发生率更低:EDITION 1 12个月随机试验,包括6个月延长期。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Sep;17(9):835-42. doi: 10.1111/dom.12472. Epub 2015 May 11.
10
New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3).在接受口服降糖药物治疗的初治2型糖尿病患者中,新型300U/ml甘精胰岛素与100U/ml甘精胰岛素的比较:一项随机对照试验(第3版)
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Apr;17(4):386-94. doi: 10.1111/dom.12438. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Study on Effectiveness of Insulin Glargine U300 After Oral Antidiabetic Drug Failure in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the Gulf Region.海湾地区2型糖尿病患者口服降糖药治疗失败后甘精胰岛素U300有效性的真实世界研究
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Mar;15(3):691-704. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01537-2. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Improved glycaemic control and weight benefit with iGlarLixi versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes advancing their therapy from basal insulin plus oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: Results from the LixiLan-L-CN randomized controlled trial.在基础胰岛素联合口服降糖药治疗的中国 2 型糖尿病患者中,与甘精胰岛素 100U/ml 相比,iGlarLixi 可改善血糖控制和体重获益:来自 LixiLan-L-CN 随机对照试验的结果。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Nov;24(11):2182-2191. doi: 10.1111/dom.14803. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
3
Evaluation of Patient Reported Satisfaction and Clinical Efficacy of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Versus 100 U/mL in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using Flash Glucose Monitoring System.使用动态葡萄糖监测系统评估1型糖尿病患者中甘精胰岛素300U/mL与100U/mL的患者报告满意度及临床疗效
Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2022 May 18;15:11795514221098415. doi: 10.1177/11795514221098415. eCollection 2022.