Schneider A J, Teule G J, Groeneveld A B, Nauta J, Heidendal G A, Thijs L G
Department of Internal Medicine, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Am Heart J. 1988 Jul;116(1 Pt 1):103-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90256-6.
The cardiac response to a rapid volume infusion was studied in 18 patients with septic shock accompanied by pulmonary hypertension. Right and left ventricular ejection fractions were measured, and right and left ventricular volume indices were calculated from ejection fractions and stroke volumes before and 30 minutes after the start of the infusion. Responders (13 patients) showed an increase in stroke volume index (SVI) as a result of a mean 30% increase in right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) and a mean 17% increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) during volume loading. In the nonresponders (five patients) fluid loading resulted in a decreased or unchanged SVI; this was accompanied by a 7% increase in RVEDVI but no change in LVEDVI, although both the central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased. At baseline, nonresponders differed from responders as evidenced by a high central venous pressure and RVEDVI but a lower mean arterial pressure: thus, right ventricular coronary perfusion pressure was lower and right ventricular wall stress may have been higher. Mean pulmonary artery pressure did not differ between the groups. Our data suggest that in some patients with septic shock volume loading does not result in increased forward flow because of right ventricular failure associated with pulmonary hypertension and coronary hypotension.
对18例伴有肺动脉高压的感染性休克患者进行了快速容量输注时心脏反应的研究。测量了右心室和左心室射血分数,并根据输注开始前和开始后30分钟的射血分数和每搏量计算右心室和左心室容量指数。反应者(13例患者)在容量负荷期间,右心室舒张末期容量指数(RVEDVI)平均增加30%,左心室舒张末期容量指数(LVEDVI)平均增加17%,导致每搏量指数(SVI)增加。在无反应者(5例患者)中,液体负荷导致SVI降低或不变;尽管中心静脉压和肺毛细血管楔压均升高,但RVEDVI增加了7%,而LVEDVI无变化。在基线时,无反应者与反应者不同,表现为中心静脉压和RVEDVI较高,但平均动脉压较低:因此,右心室冠状动脉灌注压较低,右心室壁应力可能较高。两组间平均肺动脉压无差异。我们的数据表明,在一些感染性休克患者中,由于与肺动脉高压和冠状动脉低血压相关的右心室衰竭,容量负荷不会导致前向血流增加。