• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在心力衰竭中实施预先护理计划:对初级保健专业人员的定性研究。

Implementing advance care planning in heart failure: a qualitative study of primary healthcare professionals.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

Unit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Jun 24;71(708):e550-e560. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0973. Print 2021 Jul.

DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2020.0973
PMID:33947665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8103928/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) can improve the quality of life of patients suffering from heart failure (HF). However, primary care healthcare professionals (HCPs) find ACP difficult to engage with and patient care remains suboptimal.

AIM

To explore the views of primary care HCPs on how to improve their engagement with ACP in HF.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A qualitative interview study with GPs and primary care nurses in England.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 24 primary care HCPs. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three main themes were constructed from the data: ACP as integral to holistic care in HF; potentially limiting factors to the doctor-patient relationship; and approaches to improve professional performance. Many HCPs saw the benefits of ACP as synonymous with providing holistic care and improving patients' quality of life. However, some feared that initiating ACP could irrevocably damage their doctor-patient relationship. Their own fear of death and dying, a lack of disease-specific communication skills, and uncertainty about the right timing were significant barriers to ACP. To optimise their engagement with ACP in HF, HCPs recommended better clinician-patient dialogue through question prompts, enhanced shared decision-making approaches, synchronising ACP across medical specialties, and disease-specific training.

CONCLUSION

GPs and primary care nurses are vital to deliver ACP for patients suffering from HF. HCPs highlighted important areas to improve their practice and the urgent need for investigations into better clinician-patient engagement with ACP.

摘要

背景

预先医疗照护计划(ACP)可以提高心力衰竭(HF)患者的生活质量。然而,初级保健医护人员(HCPs)发现很难参与 ACP,患者的护理仍然不尽如人意。

目的

探讨初级保健 HCPs 如何改善他们在 HF 中的 ACP 参与度的观点。

设计和环境

在英格兰,对全科医生和初级保健护士进行了一项定性访谈研究。

方法

采用目的抽样法对 24 名初级保健 HCPs 进行半结构式访谈。使用反思性主题分析对数据进行分析。

结果

从数据中构建了三个主要主题:ACP 是 HF 整体护理的组成部分;可能限制医患关系的因素;以及改善专业表现的方法。许多 HCPs 认为 ACP 的好处与提供整体护理和提高患者的生活质量是等同的。然而,一些人担心启动 ACP 可能会不可逆转地破坏他们的医患关系。他们自己对死亡和濒死的恐惧、缺乏特定疾病的沟通技巧以及对正确时机的不确定性是 ACP 的重要障碍。为了优化他们在 HF 中的 ACP 参与度,HCPs 建议通过问题提示改善医患对话,增强共享决策方法,在医疗专业之间同步 ACP,并进行特定疾病的培训。

结论

全科医生和初级保健护士是为 HF 患者提供 ACP 的关键。HCPs 强调了改善实践的重要领域,迫切需要调查更好的医患 ACP 参与度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ae/8249034/20e9efc70e64/bjgpjul-2021-71-708-e550-oa-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ae/8249034/53ff70de218b/bjgpjul-2021-71-708-e550-oa-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ae/8249034/20e9efc70e64/bjgpjul-2021-71-708-e550-oa-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ae/8249034/53ff70de218b/bjgpjul-2021-71-708-e550-oa-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ae/8249034/20e9efc70e64/bjgpjul-2021-71-708-e550-oa-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing advance care planning in heart failure: a qualitative study of primary healthcare professionals.在心力衰竭中实施预先护理计划:对初级保健专业人员的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Jun 24;71(708):e550-e560. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0973. Print 2021 Jul.
2
Views of advanced cancer patients, families, and oncologists on initiating and engaging in advance care planning: a qualitative study.晚期癌症患者、家属和肿瘤医生对启动并参与预先医疗照护计划的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 1;19(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00655-5.
3
How do Dutch primary care providers overcome barriers to advance care planning with older people? A qualitative study.荷兰初级医疗服务提供者如何克服与老年人进行预先护理规划的障碍?一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2019 Mar 20;36(2):219-224. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy055.
4
Exploring patient-reported barriers to advance care planning in family practice.探索家庭医疗中患者对预先医疗指示计划的阻碍因素。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 25;21(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01167-0.
5
The importance of trust-based relations and a holistic approach in advance care planning with people with dementia in primary care: a qualitative study.在初级保健中与痴呆症患者进行基于信任的关系和整体方法的预先护理计划的重要性:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0872-6.
6
Complexity of implementing a nationwide advance care planning program: results from a qualitative evaluation.实施全国性预先医疗照护计划的复杂性:来自定性评估的结果。
Age Ageing. 2022 Oct 6;51(10). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac224.
7
Advance Care Planning in Asia: A Systematic Narrative Review of Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Attitude, and Experience.亚洲的预先医疗照护计划:医疗保健专业人员知识、态度和经验的系统叙事性回顾。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):349.e1-349.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.018. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
8
Implementing advance care planning: A qualitative exploration of nurses' perceived benefits and challenges.实施预先护理计划:对护士感知到的益处和挑战的定性探讨。
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Jul;28(5):1080-1087. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13056. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
9
Advance care planning after hospital discharge: qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers from patient interviews.出院后预先医疗照护计划:对患者访谈中促进因素和障碍因素的定性分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Dec 5;17(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0379-0.
10
Healthcare professionals' perceptions of advance care planning in palliative care unit: a qualitative descriptive study.医护人员对姑息治疗病房中预先医疗指示的看法:一项定性描述性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Mar;30(5-6):633-644. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15578. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived acceptability of a prototype toolkit to support patients and informal caregivers to express their perspectives in palliative care conversations.一种原型工具包在支持患者和非正式照护者在姑息治疗对话中表达自身观点方面的可接受度认知。
PEC Innov. 2025 Mar 17;6:100387. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100387. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Experiences of using the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) in English general practice: a qualitative study among key primary health and social care professionals, patients, and their relatives.在英国全科医疗中使用《紧急护理与治疗推荐总结计划》(ReSPECT)的经验:一项针对关键初级卫生和社会护理专业人员、患者及其亲属的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jan 30;75(751):e143-e152. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0248. Print 2025 Feb.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to stakeholder engagement in advance care planning for older adults in community settings: a hybrid systematic review protocol.社区环境中老年人预先护理计划利益相关者参与的促进因素和障碍:一项混合系统评价方案
HRB Open Res. 2021 Jun 11;3:38. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13082.2. eCollection 2020.
2
Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour.初级保健研究中的半结构化访谈:关系与严谨性的平衡。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 8;7(2):e000057. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000057. eCollection 2019.
3
Advance care planning for vulnerable older adults within an Accountable Care Organization: study protocol for the IMPACT randomised controlled trial.
What helps or hinders the communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis.二级医疗与初级医疗之间关于不良预后的沟通受到哪些因素的促进或阻碍?一项进行叙述性综合分析的系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec 26;75(750):e20-e27. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0341. Print 2025 Jan.
4
Implementing advance care planning in palliative and end of life care: a scoping review of community nursing perspectives.在姑息治疗和临终关怀中实施预先护理计划:社区护理视角的范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 28;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04888-4.
5
When should Home-visit nurses initiate end-of-life discussions for patients with Organ failure and family caregivers? A qualitative study.家庭访视护士应在何时与器官衰竭患者及其家庭照顾者展开临终讨论?一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 7;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01401-x.
6
Experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals implementing advance care planning for people suffering from life-limiting illness: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.生命终末期患者的医护人员实施预先医疗照护计划的经验和观点:系统评价和定性研究的元综合。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 May 6;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01176-7.
7
Actual timing versus GPs' perceptions of optimal timing of advance care planning: a mixed-methods health record-based study.实际时间与全科医生对预先医疗照护计划最佳时间的认知:基于混合方法健康记录的研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Dec 13;23(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01940-3.
8
Unmet Needs in Patients With Heart Failure: The Importance of Palliative Care in a Heart Failure Clinic.心力衰竭患者未满足的需求:姑息治疗在心力衰竭诊所中的重要性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 30;9:866794. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.866794. eCollection 2022.
9
Views and experiences of young people, their parents/carers and healthcare professionals of the advance care planning process: A summary of the findings from a qualitative study.年轻人、其父母/照顾者和医疗保健专业人员对预先护理计划过程的看法和经验:一项定性研究结果概述。
Palliat Med. 2022 May;36(5):841-854. doi: 10.1177/02692163221083447. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
有条件照顾计划在老年护理机构中的应用:对脆弱老年人的影响——一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e032732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032732.
4
The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.预先医疗照护计划对心力衰竭的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):874-884. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05482-w. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
5
Clinician barriers and facilitators to heart failure advance care plans: a systematic literature review and qualitative evidence synthesis.临床医生在心力衰竭预立医疗计划方面的障碍与促进因素:一项系统文献综述和定性证据综合分析
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Jul 22. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001747.
6
A systematic review of the effects of advance care planning facilitators training programs.对预先护理计划促进者培训项目效果的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4192-0.
7
Advance care planning after hospital discharge: qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers from patient interviews.出院后预先医疗照护计划:对患者访谈中促进因素和障碍因素的定性分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Dec 5;17(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0379-0.
8
Enhancing self-care adherence in patients with heart failure: a study protocol for developing a theory-based behaviour change intervention using the COM-B behaviour model (ACHIEVE study).增强心力衰竭患者自我护理依从性:使用 COM-B 行为模型(ACHIEVE 研究)开发基于理论的行为改变干预措施的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 11;8(9):e025907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025907.
9
Feasibility and acceptability of a patient-reported outcome intervention in chronic heart failure.慢性心力衰竭患者报告结局干预措施的可行性和可接受性
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Dec;7(4):470-479. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001355. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
10
Patient autonomy and advance care planning: a qualitative study of oncologist and palliative care physicians' perspectives.患者自主性和预先医疗指令:对肿瘤学家和姑息治疗医生观点的定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):565-574. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3867-5. Epub 2017 Aug 28.