• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Views of advanced cancer patients, families, and oncologists on initiating and engaging in advance care planning: a qualitative study.晚期癌症患者、家属和肿瘤医生对启动并参与预先医疗照护计划的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 1;19(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00655-5.
2
Advantages, barriers, and cues to advance care planning engagement in elderly patients with cancer and family members in Southern Thailand: a qualitative study.在泰国南部的老年癌症患者及其家属中推进预先护理计划的参与:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 21;23(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01536-x.
3
Current Status of Advance Care Planning and End-of-life Communication for Patients with Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer.晚期和转移性乳腺癌患者的预先医疗指示和临终关怀沟通的现状。
Oncologist. 2021 Apr;26(4):e686-e693. doi: 10.1002/onco.13640. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
4
Advance care planning and goals of care discussion: the perspectives of Brazilian oncologists.预先医疗照护计划和医疗目标讨论:巴西肿瘤学家的观点。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Sep 22;21(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01052-w.
5
The decisional balance, attitudes, and practice behaviors, its predicting factors, and related experiences of advance care planning in Taiwanese patients with advanced cancer.台湾地区晚期癌症患者的决策平衡、态度、实践行为及其预测因素,以及与预先医疗照护计划相关的经验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Nov 2;21(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01073-5.
6
Patient autonomy and advance care planning: a qualitative study of oncologist and palliative care physicians' perspectives.患者自主性和预先医疗指令:对肿瘤学家和姑息治疗医生观点的定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):565-574. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3867-5. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
7
Advance care planning: a qualitative study of dialysis patients and families.预立医疗照护计划:对透析患者及其家属的定性研究
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):390-400. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07490714. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
8
Patient experiences of nurse-facilitated advance care planning in a general practice setting: a qualitative study.患者在一般实践环境中对护士协助的预先医疗指示规划的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Mar 6;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0411-z.
9
Advance Care Planning in Nursing Home Patients With Dementia: A Qualitative Interview Study Among Family and Professional Caregivers.养老院痴呆症患者的预先护理计划:家庭和专业护理人员的定性访谈研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Nov 1;16(11):979-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.015. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
10
Actual and Missed Opportunities for End-of-Life Care Discussions With Oncology Patients: A Qualitative Study.终末期癌症患者的生存机会和错失的生存机会:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113193. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13193.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators of advance care planning practices in multi-disciplinary, multi-facility palliative care for Japan's aging population: A qualitative analysis.日本老年人口多学科、多机构姑息治疗中预先护理计划实践的障碍与促进因素:一项定性分析
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0323976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323976. eCollection 2025.
2
Having hard conversations: Advance care planning, serious illness conversations, and goals of care discussions with oncology patients.进行艰难对话:与肿瘤患者进行预先护理规划、重病对话及护理目标讨论。
Can Fam Physician. 2025 Feb;71(2):117-120. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7102117.
3
Artificial intelligence-enabled social media listening to inform early patient-focused drug development: perspectives on approaches and strategies.借助人工智能的社交媒体倾听,为以患者为中心的早期药物研发提供信息:方法与策略的视角
Front Digit Health. 2024 Nov 20;6:1459201. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1459201. eCollection 2024.
4
The ethical dimensions of utilizing Artificial Intelligence in palliative care.在姑息治疗中使用人工智能的伦理维度。
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Jun;32(4):1285-1296. doi: 10.1177/09697330241296874. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
5
Experiences with implementing advance care planning (ACP-GP) in Belgian general practice in the context of a cluster RCT: a process evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.在一项整群 RCT 背景下,实施比利时普通实践中的预先医疗照护计划(ACP-GP)的经验:使用 RE-AIM 框架的过程评估。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 6;25(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02510-5.
6
Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) scale in a German hospital setting.德国医院环境中临终对话准备度(REOLC)量表的验证
PEC Innov. 2022 May 2;1:100045. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100045. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals implementing advance care planning for people suffering from life-limiting illness: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.生命终末期患者的医护人员实施预先医疗照护计划的经验和观点:系统评价和定性研究的元综合。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 May 6;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01176-7.
8
Time of Clinic Appointment and Serious Illness Communication in Oncology.门诊预约时间与肿瘤学中的重病沟通。
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231170488. doi: 10.1177/10732748231170488.
9
Patient Engagement With Early Stage Advance Care Planning at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.患者参与综合性癌症中心的早期预先医疗照护计划。
Oncologist. 2023 Jun 2;28(6):542-550. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad015.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study.初级保健中讨论和记录预先医疗指示的频率:一项多中心横断面观察性研究的二次分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Mar 17;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00543-y.
2
Prognostic Indices for Advance Care Planning in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.初级保健中预先医疗指示的预后指标:范围综述。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Mar-Apr;33(2):322-338. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190173.
3
Feasibility and acceptability of a culturally adapted advance care planning intervention for people living with advanced cancer and their families: A mixed methods study.文化适应性预先医疗照护计划干预措施在晚期癌症患者及其家属中的可行性和可接受性:一项混合方法研究。
Palliat Med. 2020 May;34(5):651-666. doi: 10.1177/0269216320902666. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
4
Shared decision making with oncologists and palliative care specialists effectively increases the documentation of the preferences for do not resuscitate and artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a model testing study.与肿瘤学家和姑息治疗专家共同决策可有效增加对晚期癌症患者的不复苏和人工营养与水合意愿的记录:一项模型测试研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Feb 4;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0521-7.
5
Primary care clinicians' confidence, willingness participation and perceptions of roles in advance care planning discussions with patients: a multi-site survey.初级保健临床医生在与患者进行预先医疗照护计划讨论方面的信心、参与意愿和角色认知:一项多地点调查。
Fam Pract. 2020 Mar 25;37(2):219-226. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz050.
6
General practice physicians' and nurses' self-reported multidisciplinary end-of-life care: a systematic review.全科医生和护士自我报告的多学科临终关怀:一项系统综述。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 29. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001852.
7
Framing advance care planning in Parkinson disease: Patient and care partner perspectives.在帕金森病中构建预先护理计划:患者和护理伙伴的观点。
Neurology. 2019 May 28;92(22):e2571-e2579. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007552. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
8
Effect of the Serious Illness Care Program in Outpatient Oncology: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.严重疾病照护计划对门诊肿瘤学的影响:一项群组随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jun 1;179(6):751-759. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0077.
9
Palliative care consultation and aggressive care at end of life in unresectable pancreatic cancer.无法切除的胰腺癌患者的临终前姑息治疗咨询和积极治疗。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(1):28-36. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4389. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
10
Patient Perspectives on Advance Care Planning via a Patient Portal.患者通过患者门户网站对预立医疗计划的看法。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Aug;36(8):682-687. doi: 10.1177/1049909119832820. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

晚期癌症患者、家属和肿瘤医生对启动并参与预先医疗照护计划的看法:一项定性研究。

Views of advanced cancer patients, families, and oncologists on initiating and engaging in advance care planning: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Dalhousie Medical School, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 1;19(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00655-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-020-00655-5
PMID:33004023
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7531150/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) is a process by which patients reflect upon their goals, values and beliefs to allow them to make decisions about their future medical treatment that align with their goals and values, improving patient-centered care. Despite this, ACP is underutilized and is reported as one of the most difficult processes of oncology. We sought to: 1) explore patients' and families' understanding, experience and reflections on ACP, as well as what they need from their physicians during the process; 2) explore physicians' views of ACP, including their experiences with initiating ACP and views on ACP training.

METHODS

This was a qualitative descriptive study in Nova Scotia, Canada with oncologists, advanced cancer out-patients and their family members. Semi-structured interviews with advanced cancer out-patients and their family members (n = 4 patients, 4 family members) and oncologists (n = 10) were conducted; each participant was recruited separately. Data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis, which entailed coding, categorizing, and identifying themes recurrent across the datasets.

RESULTS

Themes were identified from the patient / family and oncologist groups, four and five respectively. Themes from patients / families included: 1) positive attitudes towards ACP; 2) healthcare professionals (HCPs) lack an understanding of patients' and families' informational needs during the ACP process; 3) limited access to services and supports; and 4) poor communication between HCPs. Themes from oncologists included: 1) initiation of ACP discussions; 2) navigating patient-family dynamics; 3) limited formal training in ACP; 4) ACP requires a team approach; and 5) lack of coordinated systems hinders ACP.

CONCLUSIONS

Stakeholders believe ACP for advanced cancer patients is important. Patients and families desire earlier and more in-depth discussion of ACP, additional services and supports, and improved communication between their HCPs. In the absence of formal training or guidance, oncologists have used clinical acumen to initiate ACP and a collaborative healthcare team approach.

摘要

背景

预先医疗照护计划(ACP)是一个让患者反思自己的目标、价值观和信念的过程,使他们能够根据自己的目标和价值观做出未来医疗治疗的决策,从而改善以患者为中心的护理。尽管如此,ACP 的利用率仍然很低,并且被报告为肿瘤学中最困难的过程之一。我们试图:1)探讨患者和家属对 ACP 的理解、经验和反思,以及他们在这一过程中需要医生提供什么;2)探讨医生对 ACP 的看法,包括他们在启动 ACP 方面的经验以及对 ACP 培训的看法。

方法

这是加拿大新斯科舍省的一项定性描述性研究,涉及肿瘤学家、晚期癌症门诊患者及其家属。对晚期癌症门诊患者及其家属(n=4 名患者,4 名家属)和肿瘤学家(n=10)进行了半结构化访谈;每个参与者都是单独招募的。使用恒比分析方法对数据进行分析,该方法包括编码、分类和识别跨数据集重复出现的主题。

结果

从患者/家属和肿瘤学家两组中分别确定了主题,分别为四个和五个。患者/家属组的主题包括:1)对 ACP 的积极态度;2)医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)在 ACP 过程中缺乏对患者和家属信息需求的了解;3)服务和支持的有限获取;4)HCPs 之间沟通不畅。肿瘤学家组的主题包括:1)启动 ACP 讨论;2)驾驭患者-家庭动态;3)在 ACP 方面的正式培训有限;4)ACP 需要团队方法;5)缺乏协调的系统阻碍了 ACP。

结论

利益相关者认为晚期癌症患者的 ACP 很重要。患者和家属希望更早、更深入地讨论 ACP,增加服务和支持,并改善他们与 HCPs 之间的沟通。在缺乏正式培训或指导的情况下,肿瘤学家使用临床敏锐度来启动 ACP,并采用协作的医疗团队方法。