Fouks Bertrand, Brand Philipp, Nguyen Hung N, Herman Jacob, Camara Francisco, Ence Daniel, Hagen Darren E, Hoff Katharina J, Nachweide Stefanie, Romoth Lars, Walden Kimberly K O, Guigo Roderic, Stanke Mario, Narzisi Giuseppe, Yandell Mark, Robertson Hugh M, Koeniger Nikolaus, Chantawannakul Panuwan, Schatz Michael C, Worley Kim C, Robinson Gene E, Elsik Christine G, Rueppell Olav
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina 27403, USA.
Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Molecular Evolution and Bioinformatics, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Genome Res. 2021 Jul;31(7):1203-1215. doi: 10.1101/gr.272310.120. Epub 2021 May 4.
In contrast to the western honey bee, , other honey bee species have been largely neglected despite their importance and diversity. The genetic basis of the evolutionary diversification of honey bees remains largely unknown. Here, we provide a genome-wide comparison of three honey bee species, each representing one of the three subgenera of honey bees, namely the dwarf (), giant (), and cavity-nesting () honey bees with bumblebees as an outgroup. Our analyses resolve the phylogeny of honey bees with the dwarf honey bees diverging first. We find that evolution of increased eusocial complexity in proceeds via increases in the complexity of gene regulation, which is in agreement with previous studies. However, this process seems to be related to pathways other than transcriptional control. Positive selection patterns across reveal a trade-off between maintaining genome stability and generating genetic diversity, with a rapidly evolving piRNA pathway leading to genomes depleted of transposable elements, and a rapidly evolving DNA repair pathway associated with high recombination rates in all species. Diversification within is accompanied by positive selection in several genes whose putative functions present candidate mechanisms for lineage-specific adaptations, such as migration, immunity, and nesting behavior.
与西方蜜蜂相比,其他蜜蜂物种尽管具有重要性和多样性,但在很大程度上被忽视了。蜜蜂进化多样化的遗传基础在很大程度上仍然未知。在这里,我们对三种蜜蜂进行了全基因组比较,每种蜜蜂代表蜜蜂三个亚属中的一个,即矮蜜蜂、巨蜜蜂和穴居蜜蜂,并以熊蜂作为外类群。我们的分析解决了蜜蜂的系统发育问题,其中矮蜜蜂最先分化。我们发现,蜜蜂社会复杂性增加的进化是通过基因调控复杂性的增加来实现的,这与之前的研究一致。然而,这个过程似乎与转录控制以外的途径有关。对蜜蜂的正选择模式揭示了在维持基因组稳定性和产生遗传多样性之间的权衡,快速进化的piRNA途径导致基因组中可移动元件减少,而快速进化的DNA修复途径与所有蜜蜂物种的高重组率相关。蜜蜂内部的多样化伴随着几个基因的正选择,这些基因的推定功能为谱系特异性适应提供了候选机制,如迁徙、免疫和筑巢行为。