Suppr超能文献

我们什么时候可以停止戴口罩?基于主体的建模,以确定疫苗接种覆盖率何时使室内聚会中减少SARS-CoV-2感染的非药物干预措施变得多余。

When can we stop wearing masks? Agent-based modeling to identify when vaccine coverage makes nonpharmaceutical interventions for reducing SARS-CoV-2 infections redundant in indoor gatherings.

作者信息

Farthing Trevor S, Lanzas Cristina

机构信息

North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2021 Apr 27:2021.04.19.21255737. doi: 10.1101/2021.04.19.21255737.

Abstract

As vaccination efforts to combat the COVID-19 pandemic are ramping up worldwide, there are rising concerns that individuals will begin to eschew nonpharmaceutical interventions for preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and attempt to return to pre-pandemic normalcy before vaccine coverage levels effectively mitigate transmission risk. In the U.S.A., some governing bodies have already weakened or repealed guidelines for nonpharmaceutical intervention use, despite a recent spike in national COVID-19 cases and majority population of unvaccinated individuals. Recent modeling suggests that repealing nonpharmaceutical intervention guidelines too early into vaccine rollouts will lead to localized increases in COVID-19 cases, but the magnitude of nonpharmaceutical intervention effects on individual-level SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in fully- and partially-vaccinated populations is unclear. We use a previously-published agent-based model to simulate SARS-CoV-2 transmission in indoor gatherings of varying durations, population densities, and vaccination coverage levels. By simulating nonpharmaceutical interventions in some gatherings but not others, we were able to quantify the difference in SARS-CoV-2 infection risk when nonpharmaceutical interventions were used, relative to scenarios with no nonpharmaceutical interventions. We found that nonpharmaceutical interventions will often reduce secondary attack rates, especially during brief interactions, and therefore there is no definitive vaccination coverage level that makes nonpharmaceutical interventions completely redundant. However, the reduction effect on absolute SARS-CoV-2 infection risk conferred by nonpharmaceutical interventions is likely proportional to COVID-19 prevalence. Therefore, if COVID-19 prevalence decreases in the future, nonpharmaceutical interventions will likely still confer protective effects but potential benefits may be small enough to remain within "effectively negligible" risk thresholds.

摘要

随着全球范围内抗击新冠疫情的疫苗接种工作不断加速,人们越来越担心,在疫苗接种覆盖率有效降低传播风险之前,个人会开始回避预防新冠病毒传播的非药物干预措施,并试图恢复到疫情前的正常状态。在美国,尽管近期全国新冠病例激增且大多数人口未接种疫苗,但一些管理机构已经削弱或废除了非药物干预措施的指导方针。最近的模型表明,在疫苗推出初期过早废除非药物干预指导方针将导致新冠病例在局部地区增加,但非药物干预措施对完全接种和部分接种人群个体层面的新冠病毒感染风险的影响程度尚不清楚。我们使用一个先前发表的基于主体的模型,来模拟在不同持续时间、人口密度和疫苗接种覆盖率水平的室内聚会上新冠病毒的传播情况。通过在一些聚会上模拟非药物干预措施,而在其他聚会上不模拟,我们能够量化使用非药物干预措施时与不使用非药物干预措施的情况相比,新冠病毒感染风险的差异。我们发现,非药物干预措施通常会降低二代发病率,尤其是在短暂互动期间,因此不存在一个确定的疫苗接种覆盖率水平能使非药物干预措施完全多余。然而,非药物干预措施对绝对新冠病毒感染风险的降低效果可能与新冠疫情流行程度成正比。因此,如果未来新冠疫情流行程度下降,非药物干预措施可能仍会产生保护作用,但潜在益处可能小到仍处于“有效可忽略”的风险阈值内。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0457/8095232/48b6cfbe84f8/nihpp-2021.04.19.21255737-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验