Tanzhaus Katrin, Reiß Marie-Therese, Zaspel Tom
State Department of Criminal Investigation in Thuringia, Kranichfelder Str. 1, 99097, Erfurt, Germany.
Int J Legal Med. 2021 Jul;135(4):1385-1393. doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02597-w. Epub 2021 May 4.
Over recent years, DNA profiling techniques have become highly sensitive. Even small amounts of DNA at crime scenes can be analysed leading to new defence strategies. At court, defence lawyers rarely question the existence of a DNA trace (source level) but challenge how the DNA was transferred to the scene (activity level). Nowadays, the most common defence strategy is to claim that somebody else had stolen the defendant's gloves and used them while breaking and entering. In this study we tested this statement. Using gloves made of different material (cloth, leather, rubber) and varying secondary transfer surfaces (wood, metal, glass), we simulated a few of the most likely transfer scenarios that occur during breaking and entering. While we detected the presence of DNA on the outside of 92 of the 98 gloves tested, we observed only one case of secondary transfer in a total of 81 transfer experiments. This data demonstrates that secondary transfer under conditions resembling realistic conditions is a very rare event.
近年来,DNA 分析技术变得高度灵敏。即使犯罪现场只有少量 DNA 也能被分析,从而催生出新的辩护策略。在法庭上,辩护律师很少质疑 DNA 痕迹的存在(来源层面),而是对 DNA 如何转移到现场(活动层面)提出质疑。如今,最常见的辩护策略是声称其他人偷了被告的手套,并在入室盗窃时使用了它们。在这项研究中,我们对这一说法进行了测试。我们使用了由不同材料(布、皮革、橡胶)制成的手套以及不同的二次转移表面(木头、金属、玻璃),模拟了入室盗窃过程中一些最可能出现的转移场景。在测试的 98 只手套中,我们检测到 92 只手套外部存在 DNA,但在总共 81 次转移实验中,仅观察到一例二次转移情况。这些数据表明,在类似实际情况的条件下,二次转移是非常罕见的事件。