Meng Fanqi, Xu Shuai, Liang Yan, Zhu Zhenqi, Wang Kaifeng, Liu Haiying
Department of Spinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 7;100(18):e25824. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025824.
As the technology of combining with fusion and nonfusion procedure, cervical hybrid surgery (HS) is an efficacious alternative for treatment with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. While studies on cervical alignment between 3-level HS and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) were seldom reported. The effects of cervical imbalance on its related clinical outcomes are yet undetermined as well.Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, who underwent 3-level ACDF or HS, were included to compare cervical alignment parameters after surgery and then explore the relationship between cervical balance and clinical outcomes.Forty-one patients with HS (HS group) and 32 patients who with ACDF (ACDF group) were reviewed from February 2007 to September 2013 with the mean follow-up of 90.3 ± 25.5 (m) and 86.3 ± 28.9 (m), respectively. Cervical alignments parameters including the C2 to C7 cervical lordosis (CL), C2 to C7 sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope. and T1SCL (T1 slope minus CL), and the clinical outcomes like neck disability index (NDI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score were measured and recorded preoperatively (PreOP), intraoperatively, and on the first preoperative day and the last follow-up (FFU). The balance and imbalance groupings were sorted based on the T1SCL: T1SCL≤20°,balance; T1SCL > 20°, imbalance.We found significant improvements (P < .001) in NDI and JOA at intraoperatively and FFU after ACDF and HS, and no difference on cervical alignment and clinical outcomes between the 2 procedures on the basis of intergroup comparisons. By between-subgroups comparisons, however, we found significant differences in CL and T1SCL at PreOP (P < .05). Nonetheless, there was no significant difference on the clinical outcomes between balance and imbalance subgroups at FFU at PreOP (P > .05), indicating that the change of T1SCL was not correlated to NDI and JOA at FFU.Both HS and ACDF groups showed significant clinical improvements after surgery. There was no correlation between cervical balance and clinical symptoms.
作为融合与非融合手术相结合的技术,颈椎杂交手术(HS)是治疗脊髓型颈椎病的一种有效替代方法。然而,关于三节段HS与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)之间颈椎排列的研究报道很少。颈椎失衡对其相关临床结果的影响也尚未确定。
纳入接受三节段ACDF或HS治疗的脊髓型颈椎病患者,比较术后颈椎排列参数,然后探讨颈椎平衡与临床结果之间的关系。
回顾性分析2007年2月至2013年9月期间的41例HS患者(HS组)和32例ACDF患者(ACDF组),平均随访时间分别为90.3±25.5个月和86.3±28.9个月。测量并记录术前(PreOP)、术中、术后第1天和末次随访(FFU)时的颈椎排列参数,包括C2至C7颈椎前凸(CL)、C2至C7矢状垂直轴、T1斜率和T1SCL(T1斜率减去CL),以及临床结果,如颈部残疾指数(NDI)和日本骨科协会(JOA)评分。根据T1SCL进行平衡和失衡分组:T1SCL≤20°为平衡;T1SCL>20°为失衡。
我们发现ACDF和HS术后术中及FFU时NDI和JOA有显著改善(P<0.001),组间比较显示两种手术在颈椎排列和临床结果上无差异。然而,通过亚组间比较,我们发现术前PreOP时CL和T1SCL有显著差异(P<0.05)。尽管如此,术前PreOP时FFU时平衡和失衡亚组的临床结果无显著差异(P>0.05),表明FFU时T1SCL的变化与NDI和JOA无关。
HS组和ACDF组术后均显示出显著的临床改善。颈椎平衡与临床症状之间无相关性。