Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Int J Psychoanal. 2021 Feb;102(1):31-50. doi: 10.1080/00207578.2021.1878005.
Using Winnicott's theory, this article produces an account of the individual's relation to a . Whereas Winnicott's ideas have been almost exclusively discussed in developmental and psychopathological contexts, the present article extends Winnicott's theory and applies it to the problem of . Taking a lead from one of Winnicott's letters to Klein, the article investigates the problem of expressing one's idiosyncratic insights in the confines of a given conceptual framework. The article examines Winnicott's theory of compliance and creativity, discusses the plea that Winnicott makes to Klein, analyses the encounter with a "dead language", and investigates the asymmetrical structure of interpersonal understanding. Cashing out the latter in terms of an "illusion of contact", the article enhances our interpretation of the successes and shortcomings of interpersonal encounters - in everyday life, in clinical settings, and in the historical community of researchers. By focusing on the last mentioned in particular, the article brings forth neglected aspects of Winnicott's thinking and uses these to assess the conditions of an open dialogue within the psychoanalytic community.
本文运用温尼科特的理论，对个体与特定概念框架之间的关系进行了阐述。虽然温尼科特的思想几乎完全是在发展和精神病理学的背景下讨论的，但本文扩展了温尼科特的理论，并将其应用于解决问题。本文借鉴了温尼科特写给克莱因的一封信，探讨了在给定的概念框架内表达个人独特见解的问题。文章考察了温尼科特的顺应与创造力理论，讨论了温尼科特向克莱因提出的请求，分析了与“死语言”的相遇，以及对人际理解的不对称结构的研究。本文以“接触的错觉”来阐述后者，增强了我们对人际相遇的成功和不足的理解——在日常生活中、临床环境中以及研究人员的历史共同体中。本文特别关注最后一点，提出了温尼科特思想中被忽视的方面，并利用这些方面来评估精神分析界内开放对话的条件。
