• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Diagnosing personality disorder in depressed patients. A comparison of patient and informant interviews.

作者信息

Zimmerman M, Pfohl B, Coryell W, Stangl D, Corenthal C

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):733-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320045005.

DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320045005
PMID:3395201
Abstract

Personality disorder (PD) diagnosis were made in 66 depressed patients based on independent interviews of the patient and a close informant. The patients and informants markedly differed in their descriptions of the patients' normal personality. The kappa coefficient of agreement for the diagnosis of any PD was .13, and all kappa values for the individual PD diagnoses were below .35. Informants reported more pathologic conditions than the patients, such that PDs were diagnosed in 57.6% (38/66) of the patients, based on the informant interview, and in 36.4% (24/66), based on the patient interview. We also examined dimensional scores. In general, we found only modest correlations between the patient and informant dimensional scores and that the ratings based on the informant interviews were higher. These results varied by specific PD diagnoses. Consensus ratings, which were based on both sources of information, were sometimes more strongly associated with patient information and sometimes with informant information, and this, too, varied among the different PDs.

摘要

相似文献

1
Diagnosing personality disorder in depressed patients. A comparison of patient and informant interviews.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):733-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320045005.
2
Assessment of DSM-III personality disorders: the importance of interviewing an informant.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版人格障碍的评估:询问知情者的重要性。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1986 May;47(5):261-3.
3
DSM-III-R narcissistic personality disorder evaluated by patients' and informants' self-report questionnaires: relationships with other personality disorders and a sense of entitlement as an indicator of narcissism.通过患者和 informant 的自我报告问卷评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》中的自恋型人格障碍:与其他人格障碍的关系以及作为自恋指标的权利感。 注:这里“informant”不太明确具体准确对应中文的什么词,可根据具体语境调整,比如“提供信息者”等 。
Compr Psychiatry. 1992 Nov-Dec;33(6):397-406. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(92)90062-u.
4
Concordance between patients and informants on the personality disorder examination.
Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Apr;151(4):568-73. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.4.568.
5
The relationship between patient, informant, social worker, and consensus diagnoses of personality disorder in elderly depressed inpatients.老年抑郁症住院患者中患者、提供信息者、社会工作者与人格障碍共识诊断之间的关系。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1998 Spring;6(2):136-44.
6
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
7
Diagnostic Agreement Between Clinicians and Clients: The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the SWAP-200 and MCMI-III Personality Disorder Scales.临床医生与患者之间的诊断一致性:SWAP - 200和MCMI - III人格障碍量表的聚合效度和区分效度
J Pers Disord. 2016 Dec;30(6):796-812. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_231. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
8
Comparison of DSM-III personality disorders in recovered depressed and panic disorder patients.康复的抑郁症患者和惊恐障碍患者中DSM-III人格障碍的比较。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988 May;176(5):300-4. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198805000-00009.
9
Prognostic validity of self-report and interview measures of personality disorder in depressed inpatients.住院抑郁症患者人格障碍自我报告与访谈测量的预后效度
J Clin Psychiatry. 1987 Dec;48(12):468-72.
10
Assessing axis II disorders by informant interview.通过知情者访谈评估轴II障碍。
J Pers Disord. 1997 Summer;11(2):158-67. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1997.11.2.158.

引用本文的文献

1
Borderline features are associated with inaccurate trait self-estimations.边缘特征与不准确的特质自我估计有关。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2014 Apr 10;1:4. doi: 10.1186/2051-6673-1-4. eCollection 2014.
2
The relationship between borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder.边缘型人格障碍与双相情感障碍之间的关系。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2013 Jun;15(2):155-69. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2013.15.2/mzimmerman.
3
Self- and informant-reported perspectives on symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder.
自我报告和知情者报告的自恋型人格障碍症状观点。
Personal Disord. 2012 Apr;3(2):140-54. doi: 10.1037/a0026576. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
4
Depressive experiences in inpatients with borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍住院患者的抑郁体验
Psychiatr Q. 2007 Jun;78(2):129-43. doi: 10.1007/s11126-006-9033-8.
5
Current issues in the assessment of personality disorders.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2003 May;5(1):28-35. doi: 10.1007/s11920-003-0006-4.
6
Reliability and cultural applicability of the Greek version of the International Personality Disorders Examination.《国际人格障碍检查表》希腊语版本的信度与文化适用性
BMC Psychiatry. 2002 May 17;2:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-244x-2-6.