Suppr超能文献

一份用于诊断重度抑郁症的自陈问卷的效度

The validity of a self-report questionnaire for diagnosing major depressive disorder.

作者信息

Zimmerman M, Coryell W

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):738-40. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320050006.

Abstract

Six hundred thirteen first-degree relatives of schizophrenics, depressives, and normal controls were interviewed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) and completed the Inventory to Diagnose Depression (IDD), a self-report scale to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). The current point prevalence of MDD was nearly identical according to the two measures (DIS, 2.8%; IDD, 2.6%). Diagnostic concordance varied according to the Interval between the evaluations. When the two measures were completed within two days of each other the agreement was as high as can be expected between two instruments with less than perfect reliability. We used a family study approach to examine validity and found that both the DIS and IDD cases of depression were two to three times more frequent in the relatives of depressed patients than the relatives of schizophrenics and controls.

摘要

我们使用诊断访谈表(DIS)对613名精神分裂症患者、抑郁症患者的一级亲属以及正常对照组进行了访谈,并让他们完成了用于诊断重度抑郁症(MDD)的自评量表——抑郁症诊断量表(IDD)。根据这两种测量方法,MDD的当前时点患病率几乎相同(DIS为2.8%;IDD为2.6%)。诊断一致性根据两次评估之间的间隔时间而有所不同。当两种测量方法在彼此相隔两天内完成时,一致性达到了两种可靠性欠佳的工具之间所能预期的最高水平。我们采用家族研究方法来检验效度,结果发现,抑郁症患者亲属中,DIS和IDD诊断出的抑郁症病例比精神分裂症患者亲属及对照组亲属中的病例多两到三倍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验