• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测剖宫产术后阴道分娩成功的因素:使用德尔菲调查进行循证共识推荐的方案。

Factors predicting successful vaginal birth after caesarean section: protocol for evidence-based consensus recommendations using a Delphi survey.

机构信息

Department of Obstetric, Maternity and Child Health Care Affiliated Hospital,Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.

Department of Obstetric, Maternity and Child Health Care Affiliated Hospital,Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 May 5;11(5):e047433. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047433.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047433
PMID:33952555
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8103394/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

With the wide adoption of the two-child policy in China since 2016, a large percentage of women with a history of caesarean delivery plan to have a second child. Accordingly, the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) delivery is increasing. Women attempting repeat VBAC may experience multiple morbidities, which is also one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal mortality. However, it remains to be addressed how we evaluate factors for successful VBAC. This study aims to use a novel approach to identify a set of potential predictive factors for successful VBAC, especially for Chinese women, to be included in prediction models which can be most applicable to pregnant women in China. We plan to assess all potential predictive factors collected through a comprehensive literature review. Then the certainty of the evidence for the identified potential predictive factors will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation process. Finally, a two-round international Delphi survey will be conducted to determine the level of consensus.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study will apply a methodology through an evidence-based approach. A long list of potential predictive factors for successful VBAC will be extracted and identified through the following stages: First, an up-to-date systematic review of the published literature will be conducted to extract identified potential predictive factors for successful VBAC. Second, an online Delphi survey will be performed to achieve expert consensus on which factors should be included in future prediction models. The online questionnaires will be developed in the field of patient, maternal and fetal-related factors. A two-round international Delphi survey will be distributed to the expert panel in the field of perinatal medicine using Google Forms. Experts will be asked to score each factor using the 9-point Likert rating scale to establish potential predictive factors for the successful VBAC. The expert panel will determine on whether to include, potentially include or exclude predictive factors, based on a systematic review of clinical evidence and the Delphi method.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Jiaxing Maternity and Children Healthcare Hospital (approval number: 2019-79). The results of this study will be submitted to international peer-reviewed journals or conferences in perinatal medicine or obstetrics.

摘要

引言

自 2016 年中国广泛推行二孩政策以来,很大一部分有剖宫产史的妇女计划生二胎。因此,阴道分娩的比例(VBAC)在增加。尝试重复 VBAC 的女性可能会经历多种并发症,这也是导致产妇和围产儿死亡的主要原因之一。然而,如何评估 VBAC 成功的因素仍有待解决。本研究旨在采用一种新方法,确定一组成功 VBAC 的潜在预测因素,特别是针对中国女性,以便纳入预测模型,这些模型最适用于中国的孕妇。我们计划通过全面的文献综述评估所有潜在的预测因素。然后,使用推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)过程评估确定的潜在预测因素的证据确定性。最后,将进行两轮国际 Delphi 调查以确定共识水平。

方法和分析

本研究将采用循证方法的方法。通过以下阶段提取和确定 VBAC 成功的潜在预测因素的长清单:首先,对已发表文献进行最新的系统评价,以提取 VBAC 成功的潜在预测因素。其次,将进行在线 Delphi 调查,以就哪些因素应纳入未来预测模型达成专家共识。在线问卷将在患者、产妇和胎儿相关因素领域开发。两轮国际 Delphi 调查将使用 Google 表单分发给围产期医学领域的专家小组。专家将使用 9 分 Likert 评分量表对每个因素进行评分,以建立 VBAC 成功的潜在预测因素。专家组将根据对临床证据的系统评价和 Delphi 方法,决定是否纳入、潜在纳入或排除预测因素。

伦理和传播

该研究得到了嘉兴市妇幼保健院机构审查委员会的批准(批准号:2019-79)。本研究的结果将提交给围产期医学或妇产科的国际同行评审期刊或会议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed9/8103394/6ca001b8d519/bmjopen-2020-047433f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed9/8103394/6ca001b8d519/bmjopen-2020-047433f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed9/8103394/6ca001b8d519/bmjopen-2020-047433f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors predicting successful vaginal birth after caesarean section: protocol for evidence-based consensus recommendations using a Delphi survey.预测剖宫产术后阴道分娩成功的因素:使用德尔菲调查进行循证共识推荐的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 5;11(5):e047433. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047433.
2
Antenatal scoring system in predicting the success of planned vaginal birth following one previous caesarean section.预测既往有一次剖宫产史后计划阴道分娩成功率的产前评分系统。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;38(3):339-343. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1355896. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
3
Trends in birth choices after caesarean section in Japan: A national survey examining information and access to vaginal birth after caesarean.日本剖宫产术后分娩选择趋势:一项关于剖宫产术后阴道分娩信息及途径的全国性调查
Midwifery. 2016 Jun;37:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的选择——一项调查瑞士西部女性偏好的在线调查
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
5
Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.既往剖宫产术后计划性分娩方式与近期母婴围生结局的关系:苏格兰基于人群的病历关联队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 24;16(9):e1002913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002913. eCollection 2019 Sep.
6
Mode of birth after caesarean section: individual prediction scores using Scottish population data.剖宫产术后分娩方式:使用苏格兰人群数据的个体预测评分。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2226-6.
7
NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.美国国立卫生研究院关于剖宫产术后阴道分娩的共识发展会议声明草案:新见解
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 Mar 10;27(3):1-42.
8
Preference of birth mode and postnatal health related quality of life after one previous caesarean section in three European countries.在三个欧洲国家,有一次剖宫产史后的分娩方式偏好和产后健康相关生活质量。
Midwifery. 2019 Dec;79:102536. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102536. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
9
Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: a survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand.剖宫产术后阴道分娩:澳大利亚和新西兰的实践调查
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Jun;43(3):226-31. doi: 10.1046/j.0004-8666.2003.00073.x.
10
Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections.两次剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC-2)-VBAC-2 与 VBAC-1 和重复(第三次)剖宫产术的成功率和不良结局的系统评价与荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2010 Jan;117(1):5-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02351.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a consensus-based core outcome set for post-treatment recovery in adults with epilepsy and comorbid depression or anxiety: A Delphi and ICF-guided protocol.制定基于共识的癫痫合并抑郁症或焦虑症成人患者治疗后康复核心结局集:德尔菲法和国际功能、残疾和健康分类指导方案
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 22;20(8):e0330617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330617. eCollection 2025.
2
Established and Novel Risk Factors for 30-Day Readmission Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Modified Delphi and Focus Group Study to Identify Clinically Important Predictors.全膝关节置换术后30天再入院的既定风险因素和新风险因素:一项用于识别临床重要预测因素的改良德尔菲法和焦点小组研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 17;12(3):747. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030747.

本文引用的文献

1
The IDEAL Reporting Guidelines: A Delphi Consensus Statement Stage Specific Recommendations for Reporting the Evaluation of Surgical Innovation.IDEAL 报告指南:报告外科创新评估的德尔菲共识声明阶段特定建议
Ann Surg. 2021 Jan 1;273(1):82-85. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004180.
2
Risk models for VTE and bleeding in medical inpatients: systematic identification and expert assessment.内科住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症和出血风险模型:系统识别与专家评估。
Blood Adv. 2020 Jun 23;4(12):2557-2566. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001937.
3
An International Collaborative Consensus Statement on En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumour Incorporating Two Systematic Reviews, a Two-round Delphi Survey, and a Consensus Meeting.
国际协作共识声明:整块切除膀胱肿瘤,包含两项系统评价、两轮德尔菲调查和一次共识会议。
Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):546-569. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.059. Epub 2020 May 8.
4
Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a multicentre study on prognostic factors and feasibility.剖宫产术后阴道分娩:一项关于预后因素和可行性的多中心研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Feb;301(2):509-515. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05454-0. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
5
Low risk pregnancies after a cesarean section: Determinants of trial of labor and its failure.剖宫产术后低危妊娠:试产及其失败的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):e0226894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226894. eCollection 2020.
6
Clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.影响剖宫产术后阴道分娩率的临床干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2689-5.
7
Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与剖宫产术后阴道分娩成功相关的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2517-y.
8
Risk Factors for Recurrence after anal fistula surgery: A meta-analysis.肛瘘手术后复发的危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Sep;69:153-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
9
Mode of birth after caesarean section: individual prediction scores using Scottish population data.剖宫产术后分娩方式:使用苏格兰人群数据的个体预测评分。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2226-6.
10
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告第 205 号:剖宫产后的阴道分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e110-e127. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078.